Charlton poised to sign West Ham's Matt Fry
Thursday, 05 August 2010
By John Stanton
CHARLTON are expected to complete the signing of defender Matt Fry from West Ham United today.
The 19-year-old, who can play at left-back or centre-back, spent a spell on loan at The Valley last season but did not feature in the first team.
He will again join on a temporary basis, signing until January with an option to extend the deal until the end of the season.
0
Comments
Having been training with us last season, at least Parky knows what he is getting, so i view that as a positive.
Think West Ham wanted to have a look at him in training and they rate him very highly. Similar to how Parky is looking at some of ours before he loans them out.
maybe he is maybe he isn't BUT he isn't ours. We are grooming him for West Ham. Some loanees you could argue that there would be a chance to sign them later, as with Reid, but Fry has only just signed an extended contract at West Ham so that isn't going to be the case. I'd rather have kept Basey.
agree with that. Semedo and McCormack are too similar whilst Racon is a luxury.
we have three CB's - two to play and one on the bench and Jackson who can play LB although maybe not his preferred position. Up front we have Pawal and Akpo and, and ...... er no-one even on the bench. A back-up striker is much more important imo, actaully make that a striker to start as Akpo is the back-up's back-up.
Oh, and another keeper would be nice.
good signing i think we need a left back either starting or cover also some cover for Centre back
I'm beginning to wonder if you are Grant Basey's dad.
What does it matter if he's West Hams player? If he improves our squad then he's welcome here.
We do not have a CB on the bench - Llera is suspended after his red card against Swindon. I know Jackson will at left back but I don't see why playing Reid/Wagstaff up front is more worrying than playing er, Solly/Semedo at left back in an emergency.
I think goalkeeper is the priority at the moment.
Exactly.
And it's not as if he's an unknown quantity. The management would have had a good look at him last spring, and must have been impressed with his attitude and ability ..... or they wouldn't be going back for him now.
If West Ham have just signed him on an improved and extended contract, then they must rate him as having the quality to play in the Prem within a couple of seasons.
Could be a very useful signing.
For me, Basey committed too early/got skinned/turned easily/found out-of-position all too often. He was a useful player to have but no more than that and I don't think we'll rue letting him go.
Matt Fry seems to be a better fit for us and will again help with the natural balance of the team.
It would seem that Reid might have to play on the right wing, assuming Fry/Jackson are covering the left flank?
Friday morning?????????
what is a youth loan as opposed to a normal loan ?
How many times have hey actually watched him play?
Friday morning?????????[/quote]
what is a youth loan as opposed to a normal loan ?[/quote]
Can also play for West Hams reserves
Friday morning?????????[/quote]
what is a youth loan as opposed to a normal loan ?[/quote]
It means he can play in reserve games for wham as well as us.
But as a 19 year old at a Prem club, I assume West Ham consider he has the pace and mobility to play in the Prem?
Lack of pace has been one of our concerns in central defence.
If he has quick feet and can turn sharply, then that may help compensate for our 3 senior CBs, who total about 100 years of age between them!
It's obviously a Fry-day today ....according to the OS.
shouldnt talk with your mouth full.
but he is better than Basey nonetheless. LOL.