Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Spring on Parky (and the upcoming derby)

WSSWSS
edited July 2010 in General Charlton
Spring told Guardian Series Sport:

“The Charlton boss didn’t give me the chance to prove myself. I trained every day, I was not injured, so there was no problem there. I just did not play. The manager had his favourites and played them week in, week out, no matter what."

http://www.guardian-series.co.uk/sport/leytonorient/leytonorient/8257587.ORIENT__New_O_s_signing_has_an_eye_on_Charlton_derby/

Comments

  • Nothing to do with the "favorites" all being vastly superior players eh?
  • Spring off!
  • He was back up for Semedo, one of our best players all season. Probably talking about Racon, but I can understand why we didn't play Semedo and Spring together.
  • He was down the pecking order and on the occasions he was given his chance didn't show enough. No point him bitching about it now. He wasn't good enough, end of.
  • Steady enough player I suppose, but wasn't particularly creative, skillful or athletic, didn't really get goals and didn't make lots of tackles - basically he didn't play because we had 4 better centre midfielders.
  • Fair comments I'd say. Leeds away 0-0 comes to mind. He had a blinder that day.

    Nice footballer, maybe not half as strong as Semedo but far better range of passing and shooting.
  • Word for word what another player said at the sponsors dinner evening about Parky having his favourites and sticking with them, though he may not have his favourite blue eyed boy Theirry Racinson next season.
  • Total bollocks.

    All managers have "favourites" - that's usually because they are reliable players who are the best players in the squad and therefore make the first XI.

    Spring is a centre-midfielder and was competing with far better players in Semedo, Bailey, Shelvey and Racon for a place - that's why he didn't play.
  • [cite]Posted By: Ormiston Addick[/cite]Total bollocks.

    All managers have "favourites" - that's usually because they are reliable players who are the best players in the squad and therefore make the first XI.

    Spring is a centre-midfielder and was competing with far better players in Semedo, Bailey, Shelvey and Racon for a place - that's why he didn't play.
    100% agree
  • edited July 2010
    He is so good he has signed for Orient.

    In fairness was decent. And will proberly score against us and run over to the bench and nut parky.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hmm
    Interesting to contrast the comments here with the ones when Deano criticised Curbs when he left.
    curbs was obviously a b~@y~{@ but now Sping is a B@>{?_"£
  • A manager will pick what he himself considers his best team.
    Of course.

    And having settled on that, will want to play his best team every game.
    Settled teams tend to play together better and more consistantly.

    Isn't that the reasoning behind the old adage of 'never change a winning side' ......?


    Hard luck, Springy. You never let us down when you played, but what you're spouting is just sour grapes.
    If you were good enough, you would have played.

    And the manager wouldn't have wanted to release you.
  • Wasn't the best bit of business done though, was it by Parky?...
  • Personally, I thought Spring was good and worth more games than he got, particularly with what I saw on the pitch at times from Bailey and Racon throughout last season!

    Why shouldn't he have sour grapes about not playing regularly? At Elland Road (0-0) Spring was superb as he was against Swindon (2-2) and in another game too (can't remember which)!
  • [cite]Posted By: supaclive[/cite]Wasn't the best bit of business done though, was it by Parky?...

    With hindsight ....... and the way events unfolded, no doubt.
    But it's easy to be wise afterwards.


    So why was Spring signed in the first place? You have to look at the context at the time.

    Bottom of the league and relegation bound, and without the proverbial pot to piss in ......... Ambrose expected to be sold, Toddy couldn't play more that 20 minutes; and we'd had Racon and Zheng Zhi out injured virtually all the season so far. Then Semedo gets crocked long term.

    So we're desperate

    It's the January window ...... who with Championship experience can we find who is prepared to sign for a doomed club and on the wages we no doubt offered?

    So Spring, on loan at Sheff Utd and not playing regularly was happy to come. He plugged a hole for a while, then with the eventual return of Racon and ZZ, and the emergence of Jonjo he was benched.

    He was hardly going to be picked ahead of those players. And so it proved.
  • He also scored a winner v Palace. For that alone he deserves to be fondly remembered. Bit of a Brian Hughes; neat and tidy without really imposing himself enough on games.
  • edited July 2010
    I thought the guy had some quality that could have been better utilised when players like Racon were producing very little.
    He could shoot from long distance, his pass for Llerra's equaliser against Swindon was superb and he had a great game at Leeds.
    When considered how little he played, I think he did well and can consider himself unlucky not to have featured more.
  • He can consider himself unmlucky, but I was always under the impression that he was here to provide depth, and to be steady and unspectacular. He offered that, but as other have said, if others are offering more, in the opinion of those who see them train and play every day, he wouldn't feature as regularly as he'd have liked.

    Anyone who has played any sport at any level at all can relate to being left out unjustly (in their own view). Seems a bit silly spout off about it once in pastures new, but all the same it must have been frustrating. Nothing to read into this, IMO.
  • [cite] wasn't particularly creative, skillful or athletic, didn't really get goals and didn't make lots of tackles.

    correctomundo
    [cite] Bit of a Brian Hughes; neat and tidy without really imposing himself enough on games.

    a polite way of saying the above - basically a nothing player who one winner against Palace excepted contributed nothing here - not one of Parky's better freebie signings
  • [cite]Posted By: kinveachyaddick[/cite]
    [cite]wasn't particularly creative, skillful or athletic, didn't really get goals and didn't make lots of tackles.[/cite]
    [cite]

    correctomundo
    [cite]Bit of a Brian Hughes; neat and tidy without really imposing himself enough on games.[/cite]
    [cite]

    a polite way of saying the above - basically a nothing player who one winner against Palace excepted contributed nothing here - not one of Parky's better freebie signings[/cite][/cite]

    not even one of Parky's freebie signings - we actually paid a fee for Spring.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Undisclosed .......but nevertheless probably pretty minimal.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!