Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Trotter making it in South London

edited March 2010 in General Charlton
Went along to Millwall yesterday for my occasional day job, taking a Milwall fan back to the New Den who'd been unable to go for the last three months due to illness.

Stockport kept Millwall deep with ease for the first fifteen mins of both half, before utterly appalling og's were scored. Difference being Millwall actually had limited players who could be bothered to put themselves about in both phases when they were on top and when they were struggling.

I hadn't see Liam Trotter since Scunny last season, and the boy was utter quality. Big, strong, positionally solid and was able to pass to a team-mate or turn away from trouble it just made me lament the talented but positionally inept and 50-50 dodgers in our midfield - apart from Bailey. Put Bailey and Trotter together and you'd have an excellent champ cm let alone league one cm. Parky has managed to to acquire one player this season who's been positionally effective - Dailly - great shame we weren't sniffing around Trotter.
«1

Comments

  • edited March 2010
    [cite]Posted By: ColinTat[/cite]Went along to Millwall yesterday for my occasional day job, taking a Milwall fan back to the New Den who'd been unable to go for the last three months due to community service.

    And what a fine job he did with painting those railings.....


    Always enjoy your analysis CT, don't really know anything about Trotter
  • Only kind of heard the name, wasn't sure who he was. Checking wikipedia he's only on loan at Millwall (and he's 6 ft 2), considering we got Fry after he was at Gillingham, I'd expect Parky and his scouts to look out for players like Trotter.

    You said we were missing a certain type of player in midfield months ago and more recently I've seen what you meant. What sort of midfielder is he, I mean would he replace Semedo but add a bit more going forward, or would he purely free up Bailey to get forward?

    How did he compare to Keith Keane? Would you still like us to go for him now you've seen Trotter?
  • Trotter looks like Berbatov, ie, he looks like he is strolling around the pitch with his ipod in without a care in the world, rarely breaking out of a trot into a canter.

    The crowd is very much divided on him, as too often he looks very very lazy. But he does get things done. He is a lump (he looks like Tom Huddlestone build etc), and wins almost every centre midfield header and uses his strength to win the ball. He also rarely gives the ball away and can pick out some incisive passes.

    Would still like to see him be a little more mobile but him & Jimmy Abdou are doing a good job.

    Still love the way Charlton fans call our players 'limited' and think we are in joint second purely through hard work & physicallity! The arrogance is very amusing.
  • [cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]Still love the way Charlton fans call our players 'limited' and think we are in joint second purely through hard work & physicallity! The arrogance is very amusing.

    I would say most League 1 players are 'limited' in as much as a majority of them has a weakness. This is harder to spot as you go up the leagues. It's not the same as saying your players are poor, which is quite evidently not true.
  • edited March 2010
    [cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]Still love the way Charlton fans call our players 'limited' and think we are in joint second purely through hard work & physicallity! The arrogance is very amusing.
    I have to agree with you there. Pointed it out before, we might have more "exciting" (but inconsistent) players like Racon or Sam, but your players make up for it not just in hard work, but they're probably far better at winning the ball than our midfield are and that's an ability in itself, as it's being solid and keeping concentration. We don't have powerful, brave midfielders that read the game defensively well (not saying you neccessarily do yourselves, I don't know, but we certainly don't). Pure hard work isn't enough in this league, you simply wouldn't keep the ball or score goals otherwise.

    With our players weaknesses they're limited themselves, though we have some fans that like to blame their performances entirely on Parky and believe we have a top 6 Championship midfield. Not sure that's arrogance, more not realising the gaps not as big between us and a lot the league as they hoped/expected it to be.
  • Scoham - think your last parapraph is probably spot on.

    It's something that affects most teams who come down, think they will walk the league and due to your recent 'success' (premier league etc) a lot of your fans probably feel you don't belong at this level, that you're too good for it and this season would be a walk in the park.

    What fans forget though is the reasons why a team got relegated in the first place and what their weaknesses are and they start to become apparent over the course of a season which is happening now.

    This league is pretty tight, the league above is even tighter, not much to choose between a lot of teams. Norwich, us & yourselves could go up this year and mount a play off challenge next year. Alternatively we could both miss out on promotion, lose a few players, and be looking at relegation to the 4th division next year!

    It's a very fine line, most teams are much of a muchness, a lot comes down to team spirit, determination etc, something that Leeds keep lacking each year!
  • ".....but you're players......"

    Watch your spelling etc Scoham; Little Lion will pounce on you for it (GRRRRRR)......when he's not on a Millwall site that is.
  • [cite]Posted By: PL54[/cite]".....but you're players......"

    Watch your spelling etc Scoham; Little Lion will pounce on you for it (GRRRRRR)......when he's not on a Millwall site that is.
    oops, don't normally mix yours and you'res up :-(
  • [quote][cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]Scoham - think your last parapraph is probably spot on.

    It's something that affects most teams who come down, think they will walk the league and due to your recent 'success' (premier league etc) a lot of your fans probably feel you don't belong at this level, that you're too good for it and this season would be a walk in the park.[quote]

    SLL....meet OohaahMortimer.
  • To be fair, from what I have seen, I would also have Lloyd Sam and Jonjo Shelvey definitely.

    No idea about this Racon fella though, didn't notice him in our two games and seems to divide opinion on here a little.

    Bailey is one of the best I have seen in this league.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Agree with what you're saying Prophet in as much as Millwall clearly have good players, but I don't think anyone in this thread has said any differently. The word 'limited' has been used, but that applies to most players in the division in some respect.
  • edited March 2010
    Limited eh? We had limited players in the premiership, some were just limited and SHIIIIIIITE others were able to do a job quite effectively. I suppose I used the wrong phrase 'put themselves about' incorrectly, I don't mean whacking players I mean getting at players, willing to take players on and closing down - that from Abdou and Trotter especially.

    Morrison is incredibly limited, I can't believe people don't just man mark him, with his lumbering brain freeze play if someone goes tight on him. I'm not arguing we have better, but without Harris' movement in the first half Morrison mobilised like the Maginot line. I was very impressed by Harris, whilst being quite impressed by Hackett and Schofield. Having seen Schofield before, I'm well aware how limited he is, but when up against Stockport's loose full back/midfield unit they were willing to go outside and inbetween lines. Something our wingers rarely want to do.

    As soon as Stockport scored an OG you could see it'd be a bagfull. Stockport were to eager to play a bit stretched out and higher up the pitch, as soon as the confidence went Schofield and Hackett were able to push up with single cover on them. Trotter held everything together nicely, whilst Abdou was able to break a little more because of that.

    If it's one thing we've missed for years it's a reliable screen in front of defence, that breaks things down and passes it forwards effectively getting things going again. I wouldn't underestimate how important that is, if Trotter plays like that week in week out. He does move about and look like Huddlestone, but unlike Huddlestone he plays tight on his position/role; whereas Huddlestone has to go loose for space as his only effect is glory-balls, and is always that little bit late getting there to even bother make a strong tackle. I hope Trotter stays with Millwall if they go up, otherwise yes from what I saw he'll be a vast improvement on what we have and on Keith Keane. We need height and someone else other than Bailey who's willing to back himself in a 50-50.

    Yes Millwall were far superior than us, both in footballing and commitment terms. I really don't know what Parky is talking about spending money and getting a side, as their first 11 looks far better than anything we've put out in two seasons.
  • 3 Millwall posts in a row

    Hilarious

    No One Knows Us.....
  • Millwall life.
  • I'd rather not - can you imagine how hard it is to be that hard all the time ?

    You slag
  • edited March 2010
    [cite]Posted By: The Prophet[/cite]Sparrows - who would Sam and Shelvey replace?

    daos - yep, fair enough.
    Shelvey in particular has the ability, going forward he's probably got the best all round game in that he can see a pass and pull it off better than anyone, his movement is good, he's a got a decent shot, he can take set pieces, put in a good cross and on his day is a clever player. He's not in our team because the rest of his game isn't there yet, mainly defensively, he wants space to drift around rather than hold his position in CM and win the ball.

    Sam on his day is one of the best wingers in the league, but he's very inconsistent and lacks a bit of belief/drive, because of that there are probably more effective right wingers in the league who just play to their ability more often.
  • PL54 - do you have anything to add or do you just chip in with boring contributions?

    Although to be fair, your innane contributions are short, whereas I ramble unlimited amounts of boredom inducing drivel.
  • To add to what ?

    A debate about which Charlton players will make it into Millwall's team when they get promoted ? No I don't have anything to add to that.

    You can have all of them.
  • edited March 2010
    [cite]Posted By: Groucho78MFC[/cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane LionScoham - think your last parapraph is probably spot on.

    It's something that affects most teams who come down, think they will walk the league and due to your recent 'success' (premier league etc) a lot of your fans probably feel you don't belong at this level, that you're too good for it and this season would be a walk in the park.

    SLL....meet OohaahMortimer.

    i stand by the fact we don't belong at this poor level, (one season in the previous 34 at this level and 81 seasons of english league football average finishing position of 30th as opposed to millwalls 45th proof that this isn't where we usually dine) but i also acknowledge that we are tosh hence we are at this level and i have to converse with millwall fans about football...

    i think you'll find i never expected us to go back up or walk this league and know that our prestigious history wont win us promotion , just like leeds' wont ... but i'm not gonna deny our heritage and pretend it never happened , i'm just thankful we had the glory years !
  • So your "natural" level is pretty much midtable of the league above and ours is on the cusp of promotion from this divison/relegation from the one above.

    Pretty much what I thought. I assume Palace rank just a few places above you though? & will start to slip lower....
  • Sponsored links:


  • "one season in the previous 34 at this level and 81 seasons of english league football average finishing position of 30th as opposed to millwalls 45th proof that this isn't where we usually dine"

    That old chestnut. I notice you never roll out the head-to-head stat. Why? I suppose because it's as irrelevant as that stated above.

    PL54 doesn't really get going until he's bought up something about a smashed toilet. He's done well to resist thus far.

    As for the football.................Jackett out!
  • ok 26 years of top flight football i would consider glorious years for us ... FA CUP winners and 14 consecutive years in the top flight including finishing 3rd 4th 3rd in the top flight....
    spending 7 consecutive years in the top flight with a host of internationals playing for us including England Internationals who made their debut whilst wearing the colours of our club , these are glory years in my eyes.....
    and yes you are are our bogey team FACT
  • Oh jesus. Get over yourselves who've turned this into a bore verbal match.

    My football team brings all my worth to the yard, and I'm like we're better than yours and we're like... oh I'll just have a fooking milkshake.
  • [cite]Posted By: ColinTat[/cite]Oh jesus. Get over yourselves who've turned this into a bore verbal match.

    My football team brings all my worth to the yard, and I'm like we're better than yours and we're like... oh I'll just have a fooking milkshake.


    That actually made me laugh out loud. I'd say 'lol', but men who write 'lol' really need a bit of a chat with themselves.
  • [cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]So your "natural" level is pretty much midtable of the league above and ours is on the cusp of promotion from this divison/relegation from the one above.

    Pretty much what I thought. I assume Palace rank just a few places above you though? & will start to slip lower....

    palaces average finishing position in the 81 seasons since we joined is 40th .....
  • [cite]Posted By: oohaahmortimer[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: Sparrows Lane Lion[/cite]So your "natural" level is pretty much midtable of the league above and ours is on the cusp of promotion from this divison/relegation from the one above.

    Pretty much what I thought. I assume Palace rank just a few places above you though? & will start to slip lower....

    palaces average finishing position in the 81 seasons since we joined is 40th .....


    Yet in the 'holy trinity' of Millwall v Charlton v Palace games, we have the dominant record.

    Still, irrelevant.
  • ANYWAY....

    Liam Trotter looked a bit shaky at first, but has gradually steadied the shaky midfield that we had earlier in the season. His presence also appears to have brought out the best in Jimmy Abdou, and he's looking like the player he was last season. Another good signing by Jackett in my opinion.
  • i' d definitely rather have won the FA cup than slipped in and out of europe unnoticed thru the back door ......
    81 seasons of league football we have finished above millwall 56 times

    ok 7th in the top flight in todays modern era is miraculous 12 seasons of top flight football very nice ....
  • Didn't think Palace had a record as bad as that. For some reason I've always thought of them as the bigger of the 3 clubs with Millwall & Charlton on a par (except of course for the past 15 years!).

    Probably to do with my earliest football memories being in the late 80's & early 90's when Palace had Wright & Bright, FA Cup Final etc whilst us two were on an equal footing.

    Not sure whether Charlton in 35th, Palace in 40th and us in 45th means we have overachieved or that you two have severely underachieved when you take into account the size of the clubs, history etc, you'd expect to be more than 10 places above us I'm sure.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!