I think it was put out as that to give the impression of stability if things started to turn better, and to give a clear indication to the players who was the boss. But i am sure there are plenty of cavaats in the nitty gritty.
3 years my arse. Dowie only got 3 months and Reed has been no better so why hasn't he gone. if Dowie's result's were the reason he was sacked why is Reed still here. the board said Dowie went because they didn't believe he could turn it around. well who actually thinks Reed is going to. i know he has took on a crap team in a crap position, so i guess if the manager that bought most of these no-hopers couldn't get them going how is Les going to do it?
Comments
I'm pretty sure that anything less than 4 points from the next two games, and he'll be out.
Humbug!
I am just praying that he accidentally stands on his glasses and has to put tape around the corner just for that added lunatic look.
anyone think it was a good idea giving him a 3 year deal?
I think it was put out as that to give the impression of stability if things started to turn better, and to give a clear indication to the players who was the boss. But i am sure there are plenty of cavaats in the nitty gritty.
Our mole is a good un...
Don't give up the day job AFKA ;-)
think they were hoping / informed the decision would of happened earlier.