Don't know what he said about Dicko - Or Elliot, who seems to be taking blame for both goals.
But this from Kent Online:
-------------
"Though we lost, I feel a lot better than I did this time last week," said Parkinson.
"We competed, we got stuck in and did all the things we didn't do at Hillsborough a week ago.
"I think we deserved a draw and I was deeply disappointed that we didn't get a penalty in second half stoppage time.
"What I want us to do now is take that level of performance into Tuesday's derby with Crystal Palace.
"Win that and I believe we'll get lift-off."
---------------
I think the interesting thing about that is his comment about taking that ''level of performance'' into Tuesday night's game.
So will he take the same side that battled so well today into the game? Or will it be Saores, Murty and Spring et al as he rings another half a dozen changes?
0
Comments
"Today we responded in the right manner and I though the subs today helped us with Andy [Gray] and Chris [Dickson] looking sharp. So there were plenty of positives to take out of the game.
"It was a good finish from young Chris. He is a lad we signed from non-league and has been patiently waiting for a chance.
"He's come on today and scored a good goalscorers' goal. He almost got the ball before it hit the back of net and ran off to the halfway line, that's how determined he was to score another goal.
"I'm pleased for Chris. He's worked hard in training and waited for a chance. The more performances he puts in like that that better chances he'll have of starting a game.”
The boss added: "I know we are going to create things going forward but we have to be strong and resilient at the back in midfield.
"Robbie [Elliot] said the first one deflected off Yassin's foot and just looped over him. I don't think it's fair to criticise him; he's done well for us.
"The second goal killed us. I said after the game we're giving away too many free-kicks all over the pitch. Our back four have got to stay on their feet and not lunge in and give fouls away on the edge of our own box.
"We've conceded a lot of goals like that from free-kicks.”
1 up front V Palarse and it aint Dickenson
And spot on, SHG. Hadn't noticed that, but Pardky is actually stating quite categorically that he will not start on Tues, isn't he?
It's not agenda analysing - it's there in black and white:
Pardky says of Dicko : "The more performances he puts in like that that better chances he'll have of starting a game.” ie , he is saying categorically that Dickson has to do that a few more times from the bench in order even to have a chance of starting a game!
I missed that when I first read it, but SHG and Goonerhater were spot on to pick up on it, IMO.
It's not agenda analysing - it's there in black and white:
Pardky says of Dicko : "The more performances he puts in like that that better chances he'll have of starting a game.” ie , he is saying categorically that Dickson has to do that a few more times from the bench in order even to have a chance of starting a game!
I missed that when I first read it, but SHG and Goonerhater were spot on to pick up on it, IMO.[/quote]
Unfortunately, GH et al are right - reading those comments, Dickson won't start on Tuesday ......
WHY THE HELL NOT?!?!?!
Who on earth thinks he shouldn't start - barring, Phil, Phil, Super Phil ?...
We are better placed than anyone else to fight this.
Talking us down got us into this
Religation is a global problem
But its not a considered piece though, or should be treated as fact. He's got a microphone thrust under his chin 20 mins after a game. Hardly a time for reflected thought.
Can think of a dozen things Parky has done wrong, but scrutinising his every word in the immediate aftermath of a match is a bit much for me when things can so easily be taken out of context or said without consideration.
Parky please do NOT play 4-5-1 on Tuesday,i will not be a happy bunny if you do
I know he said it. What i'm saying is you are all nit-picking in a very anal way. What you're saying should be said after Tuesday if that's how you feel and Dickson doesn't start.
And if you really want to scrutinise it, then there is nothing actually in what he said to state categorically that he won't be starting on Tuesday. Which is probably because 20 mins after a game, without knowing who has a knock etc, he probably hasn't a clue what team will be put out on Tuesday.
He could have said that but he chose not to. Why? Because he still has no intention of starting Dickson v Palace. Prove us wrong, Mr Pardky, please...
ooooooooo dear ooooooooooooooo dear so im a tad pissed off with ANYTHING the guy says.
So let's hear no more about how he's got an attitude problem or doesn't impress Mon-Fri at Sparrows Lane. Pardky is now on the record saing that isn't true. Or do we think that might also have been said "without consideration"?
If we're winning, you are absolutely right - who cares what he says ? 'I thought we did really well today and deserved the three points' ... fascinating. Not.
When we lose (for the eigth time in the 13 games he's been in charge), we want to know why he thinks we lost and what he can do to put it right.
So with all due respect, Aliw, I'm not quite sure what point you're making when you say don't read his comments. It's only in these circs. that his comments have any real interest or significance, isn't it?
The only advantage to playing "static" strikers up front is if they score regularly and ours don't.