Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Randolph not to blame!

The Prince-e-Paul
The Prince-e-Paul Posts: 6,694
edited January 2009 in General Charlton
the defence was poor strkiers non-existant and midfield aweful. randolph had a good game for shipping 4 goals. it could have been much worse. he deserves more from his team mates. he was a lone figure on the pitch. our best player by a mile!

Comments

  • didn't go to the game but looking at the goals on the telly i thought he looked suspect on the goals conceded
  • Maglor
    Maglor Posts: 702
    He also made three fantastic saves. He looks the best of our keepers defending crosses
  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    [cite]Posted By: oohaahmortimer[/cite]didn't go to the game but looking at the goals on the telly i thought he looked suspect on the goals conceded

    there's me thinkling you were a regualr away fan looking at your constant attacks on our away support LOL
  • first one came through a crowd and he was unsighted,second one hudson lost his man third fortune lost his man but he maybe could have done better,he made a fantastic save from jeffers though.
  • From the video the first goal looked sloppy from Randolph but couldn't have done anything about the others.

    Hudson losing Tudgay for the header for the second was terrible, he seems to give goals away every week from what I can see.

    Premiership defender my feckin fat arse.
  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    having watched the goals he was culpable for at least 2

    The one where he flapped at the corner
    and the potter one - agreed it came through the crowd of players BUT he saw it early enough as he got down quickly just messed up the save IMO
  • CAFCBourne
    CAFCBourne Posts: 3,796
    agreed, got a hand to it and should at least been strong enough to push it back out or round the post but he seemed very weak
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,495
    I think the third was not great either he totally misjudged the cross, he was watching jeffers not the ball and so got caught flat footed and fell over as the ball raced between them.
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,519
    I think Elliot is the better keeper and want him back in the side for good.
  • i think weaver is the best keeper and want him back in the side (when recovered from injury)

  • Sponsored links:



  • i think Randolph is the better keeper out of Elliott and himself.He was no way at fault for the goal from the corner,Hudson and only Hudson was responsible.
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,209
    [cite]Posted By: northstandsteve[/cite]i think Randolph is the better keeper out of Elliott and himself.He was no way at fault for the goal from the corner,Hudson and only Hudson was responsible.

    Not to mention Fortune standing totally still throughout the whole move for the third - if he'd shown some interest he'd have been able to get back on the line and make a clearnace.
  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    but if a keepers comes for a corner - and calls for it - I'm sorry keeper cops it. OK the plauyers should be alert but he must have called for it.
  • he didn't call for it hudson lost his man
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,209
    and he didn't come for it either.
  • supaclive
    supaclive Posts: 6,519
    edited January 2009
    I just go back to that awful goal he conceded last year when he dropped the ball in the net off Paddy's head - ended our season that blunder did ....

    Elliot is solid if not spectacular - he gets my vote, Randolph is prone to the odd gaff
  • i rate randolph. don't think you could have expected him to get to that corner - fair enough if it was near the middle of the goal, but he'd have had to get to near the corner of the six yard box.
  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    i'm getting goals mixed up here.

    the jeffers goals I mean he deffo flapped at that one.
  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    suspect for both goals,not to be trusted,elliot please.