Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

naff football clubs

nollynolly
edited January 2009 in General Charlton
my top five
palace
gillingham
watford
bournemouth
wycombe
no point to them.millwall however much i loathe them are a proper club with history.
«1

Comments

  • CHGCHG
    Norwich, they have nothing for nobody.
  • nollynolly
    won a league cup,and decent crowds though.
  • adamtheaddickadamtheaddick
    Fulham for me, probably about 1-2k proper fans rest are made of of tourists and visiting celebs, ground is a joke too.
  • bibblebibble
    I wonder how many fans of other footy clubs would us on their list.

    My 5:-
    Spurs
    Middlesbrough
    Gillingham
    Palace
    Birmingham
  • Czech_AddickCzech_Addick
    Fulham
  • nollynolly
    spurs?? behave.
  • CHGCHG
    [cite]Posted By: nolly[/cite]won a league cup,and decent crowds though.

    Only because they have nothing else to do and are stuck in the middle of nowhere.
  • bibblebibble
    Cant stand the Spuds. Still think they have a right to win everything.
  • Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    Fulham
    Wigan
    Bolton
    Tranmere
    Gillingham
  • C_f_WC_f_W
    I find the whole Newcastle, religion-like, more than football, greatest supported club (in an area with only one club) thing pretty naff TBH
  • Sponsored links:


  • LenGloverLenGlover
    Only one for me: MK Dons.

    The others are legitimate even if one dislikes them.
  • nollynolly
    there not even naff,they dont exist.
  • SIDSID
    Reading for me. MK Dons is a good shout though.
  • C_f_WC_f_W
    I think this thread is fast becoming 'places in Britain who aren't 'proper' football towns' (Newcastle aside, ironically!) which probably sums it up
  • JTJT
    Rochdale.

    Haven't moved leagues in a stupid amount of time.
  • LenGloverLenGlover
    [cite]Posted By: L Block JT[/cite]Rochdale.

    Haven't moved leagues in a stupid amount of time.

    Great fans though when you consider that fact.

    I wonder how many we'd get after 35 years of 4th division football?

    At least they had a trip to Wembley last season even though they lost.
  • JTJT
    35 Years? That long? Christ.....

    Point taken.
  • ElthamEltham
    Gillingham
    Palace
    Port Vale (Why would anyone follow them when Stoke City exist in the same city?)
    Tranmere(Almost as above but Liverpool and Everton)
    MK Dons
  • CAFCBourneCAFCBourne
    Birmingham City
    shite place
    shite fans
    shite board
    shite accent
  • adsads
    liverpool,chelsea,arsenal,manu,spurs,newcastle,hull,sunderland
  • Sponsored links:


  • Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    [cite]Posted By: LenGlover[/cite]Only one for me: MK Dons.
    They are beyond naff! They're a complete disgrace of a club.
  • DA9DA9
    Fulham, completely irrelevant to me.
  • Chris_from_SidcupChris_from_Sidcup
    [cite]Posted By: Eltham[/cite]Gillingham
    Palace
    Port Vale (Why would anyone follow them when Stoke City exist in the same city?)
    Tranmere(Almost as above but Liverpool and Everton)
    MK Dons


    Regarding your Port vale and tranmere thing that could apply to any number of teams. If you live in north london why support Barnet? Or in east london, why Dagenham? Why support Notts County when theres Forest? With west brom and wolves, why support Walsall? With all the clubs in lancashire, why choose Stockport?
    And in Barcelona why would you ever support Espanyol.
  • DA9DA9
    edited January 2009
    I've got a very good friend who is a Port Vale fan, moved down this way 20+ years ago to Erith, attends a lot of Charlton games, and he was one of our free coaches to Vale a few years back with us, 2 of his 3 kids are Charlton fans now.
  • March51March51
    But Port Vale doesn't exist as a place: they should be Burslem Academicals or something.
  • MrLargoMrLargo
    millwall however much i loathe them are a proper club with history.[/quote]

    Have to disagree with you there Nolly. The only history Millwall have is of providing Police 5 and Crimewatch with plenty of material over the years and they don't even do that now. Other than that, they've never won anything and spent most of their "history" in the second tier and below being watched by meagre crowds. Take away their hooligan reputation and they're no more significant than the likes of Swindon, Walsall and Stockport
  • SE10AddickSE10Addick
    edited January 2009
    [cite]Posted By: MrLargo[/cite]

    Have to disagree with you there Nolly. The only history Millwall have is of providing Police 5 and Crimewatch with plenty of material over the years and they don't even do that now. Other than that, they've never won anything and spent most of their "history" in the second tier and below being watched by meagre crowds. Take away their hooligan reputation and they're no more significant than the likes of Swindon, Walsall and Stockport

    And they dont even play in the area where they are from!!!
  • AlgarveaddickAlgarveaddick
    [cite]Posted By: Eltham[/cite]

    Port Vale (Why would anyone follow them when Stoke City exist in the same city?)

    Because their fans are a decent bunch, and Stoke's fans are 'orrible...

    Liverpool are very naff, the biggest following of glory hunters in the UK bar none (not even MUFC).
  • pilchardpilchard
    edited January 2009
    Palace
    Millwall
    Sheffield Wednesday
    Chelsea
    Newcastle United
    Middlesbrough
    Fulham
    Birmingham City
    Spurs
  • ElthamEltham
    edited January 2009
    My mate a work is a Stoke fan, he's a nice fella. Maybe I'm being influenced here? Stoke is a small city, population of well under 1million. I just can't understand why such a small city has two football clubs, seems odd that's all. As for Tranmere, most of their fans tend to be Everton or Liverpool fans who can't afford to go there. There are very few exclusively Tranmere supporters.

    Alot of folk here don't seem to have much time for Spurs. Why?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!