Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

If we could change one rule...

How about reducing matches to 60 mins? We might have a chance of a win, then....
«1

Comments

  • Or whoever concedes the most wins we'd be Top !
  • After 25 games the table gets turned upside down.
  • 3 points for a defeat
  • Points are awarded at end of season for worst away support. 24 points for worst, 23 22 21 etc - should see us move swiftly up the table.
  • More than 5 loan players allowed!!!! ;-)
  • [cite]Posted By: ads[/cite]3 points for a defeat

    That's the one we need, Ads. Quality!

    ;o)
  • managers couldn't leave with 1 year left on their contract.
  • Each team is allowed one wildcard substitution - poaching a player from the opponents subs bench.
  • To even things up against thuggish full-backs, each team may nominate one nippy winger who is allowed to wear running spikes.
  • Seriously, I think the points system should be changed to encourage attacking football. 1 point for a no-score draw, 2 points for a score draw and 3 points for a win
  • Sponsored links:


  • No relegation from The Championship this year.
  • [cite]Posted By: stubs1310[/cite]Seriously, I think the points system should be changed to encourage attacking football. 1 point for a no-score draw, 2 points for a score draw and 3 points for a win

    I remember someone (a manager or pundit, maybe a chairman, can't remember) suggested 4 points for an away win, 3 for a home win, 2 for an away draw, 1 for a home draw.

    It would be interesting to see if the league tables are much different either way.
  • I would like to add one mandatory substitution at half time.

    Or failing that I would retrospectively deduct points for diving. One point if you get an opponent booked, 2 for a red card or penalty.
  • [cite]Posted By: kigelia[/cite]I would like to add one mandatory substitution at half time.

    Which the fans get to vote for? I'm sure that would mean we'd have Dickson or Shelvey on at half time every game.
  • Millwall would start every match 4-0 down.
  • MAKE referees do an interview after the match to explain there actions
  • [cite]Posted By: FriskyFisky[/cite]MAKE referees do an interview after the match to explain there actions

    Good one.

    I'd introduce a barbilliards style mushroom (but bigger - mansized) that if you knocked it over with the ball reset the opposition's score to zero. You could be 5-0 down with a minute to go and win one nil. It'd work against us obviously.
  • Get Players on performance rated contracts!
  • [cite]Posted By: kodfish[/cite]Get Players on performance rated contracts!

    and managers...grrrr
  • "Get Players on performance rated contracts!"

    "and managers...grrrr "

    Cracking idea although on that basis Parky and most of our first team squad would be potless and living on the streets by now. And Weaver would have been forced to moonlight in the occupation we used to associate with him.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited January 2009
    Referees do not have to explain their decisions although I agree in certain circumstances they don't help themselves when they say nothing (esp the awful Rob Styles). Football is the only sport where refs just aren't trusted and are continually dissented against by players, managers and the media. In cricket the umpire's decision is final as it is in rugby and any dissent is quickly and harshly dealt with on the pitch and after the match. I do agree that football refs do need the use of technology which is making lives easier for 21st century cricket umpires and rugby referees, it's about time football came up to date!!!

    If I could change one rule I would say no teams in red and white can be relegated apart from Forest, Doncaster and Southampton lol...
  • [cite]Posted By: Spankie[/cite] In cricket the umpire's decision is final

    I'll raise you. one Mike Gatting ;-)
  • Well 99.99% of decisions are...lol
  • No team with a sword in their badge can never get relegated
  • No team whose name begins and ends with the same letter can get relegated!
  • If a ref makes a mistake that costs one team a victory and this is established on video then said official should be placed in stocks and fans of the wronged side can hurl piss soaked sponges at him. The fans have to make a charitable donation of ten pounds, so it would be doing a lot of good.
  • Bookings and sendings off should result in points deductions not suspensions.

    For example what good is it to Charlton when a bloke picking his fifth yellow of the season playing against us is then suspended for his club's next game against Doncaster. Our relegation rivals have the advantage of playing a weakened team because of an offence commited against Charlton.
  • Allow beer to be drunk in the stands
  • [cite]Posted By: DaveMehmet[/cite]Allow beer to be drunk in the stands

    Very european. I went to see FC Copenhagen and not only can you drink beer in the stands they sell you them in natty cardboard carry handles which means you can transport 8 at once without spillage fear.
  • Ref only sees said situation once at normal speed. Sky slow things down and use 10 different angles so there's no doubt top flight refs still make goofs. As said before with the right use of video technology it can only help with the right decision in the end. I do not believe with the 'refs on trial' vein that most footy fans persue. Referees are going to make decisions that will upset one side or the other and just because that decision may go against CAFC don't thnk that ref is bias in any way, shape or form. I go to games now supporting Charlton 100% but seeing the game from the refs point of view. Quite bizarre!!!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!