just typed a long post then lost it because I didn't select a category. Anyway, it's thrust was bring back Moo2. What has he done wrong ? I'd rather see him at RB anyday than the likes of those that Pards has preferred over him. And now it's Cranie. Is he any better than Moo2 ? Not on that performance yesterday. At fault for one of the goals he should now be dropped as that is how Pards treats Moo2. Bring back Moo2. At the same time bring back Basey at LB. Youga was all over the place yesterday, as he was at Watford ,and he has been pretty poor over all this season.
0
Comments
He bought a new dimension to the team and his link up play with Sam was superb.
He did enough in that match to merit an extended run in the side. To drop him one game later was madness. His confidence and experience will only grow by playing games. Pards is doing his best to shatter his confidence.
He's a young kid, he's going to make the odd defensive error, if he sets up a couple of goals with his great crossing and working the line with Sam, does it really matter?
Hudson, Fortune, Cranie and Semedo, Basey, Primus thats how far down the pecking order i see moots and youga as defenders moots could step up into the midfield
Then we'll be back at the same place as we started.
;-)
Are you Pards in disguise? ;-)
however i can not understand how the feeling against cranie is there as to me no he never had an outstanding game but he didnt do much wrong for someone in his first game and who was away with the u21's and only had a week or so with the team.
moots was not good enough last year or so far this youga has gone down hill since getting his contract and forts made one mistake in the 1st half like he always does that normally costs us a goal but got lucky he didnt really do that much wrong after the break.
we were so worried about ebanks blake that the mgmt team completely forgot about keogh our defensive frailties lie with our tactics not just the players
Pards obviously doesn't rate him. Which is a shame. Sam seems to play better with him. And two of our best performances in 2008 Blackpool (H) and Reading have come when he has been bombing down the right wing.
He was in the West Stand on Saturday - me and Kigelia saw him*
*or someone who looked just like him more probably!
Mouts was dropped for a sliced clearance... A mis-kick! And as someone else said, why bother developing someone elses player when we have our own?
I'm interested to see whether he drops Cranie for something he would have definitely dropped Mouts for!
Don't get me wrong, I quite like both of them (for effort and attacking ability) but why one rule for Kelly, and another for Yassin?
Pards said at the Q&A that OUR players don't like loan signings, and that it unsettled us last year. Then he goes and signs a bloke with no experience and drops a player he actually paid money for and who hasn't had a real run in the team!
If I was Moo2 I'd be looking for a new club now...
Would you drop Hudson or Fortune?
Neither of them. I think by and large they have been a good combination.
In my opinion Crainie needs to earn a place on merit rather than just because he is a loanee from a premiership club.
To be fair however, none of the full backs have so far earned the right to stake a claim, nevertheless it would be cool if in Moo2s case he'd actually had a reall opportunity to do so.