Four deals were completed yesterday for fees alone that were larger than the yearly budget for our entire football club.
In two of the cases, it was for three times the budget.
Next season, if there is no promotion, our budget is likely to be nearly halved again, meaning the fee alone for Robinho would be nearly six times the budget of an average Championship club.
The distortion between just two leagues is obscene, and is the single biggest issue destroying the pyramid of football in this country.
There is little anyone can do to stop huge wealth coming into the high profile big clubs, but it is critical that some form of division of wealth is arranged so that a complete closed shop is avoided before it is too late.
0
Comments
also could redistribute more money to the championship, but the whole idea of the Premiership was to move away from this.
IMO its the CL and the huge amounts of money on offer there which then means you can buy "big" players therefore more or less guaranteeing a top 4 spot and another slice of the CL pie. Its like a huge snowball. One that all the other clubs spend money they cant afford in trying to chase. In turn meaning this spending needs to filter down to the likes of Hull, Stoke etc just so they can compete and get points from midtable sides.
But yes agree. A pool would be a good idea.
That more or less happened to Leeds, champions league semis to league one in 4-5 years but it hasn't stopped any one else spending.
Not much chance of it changing unless people stop going to games, stop buying merchandise and get rid of their sky and setanta. As long as people keep buying the product, the clubs will continue to spend our money.
But yes agree that whilst the consumer demand is still there, then they'll keep supplying what we (allegedly) want.
this is the nature of free markets they tend to allow speculation and can be unstable/ boom bust if not kept under control, so I guess we can expect it to go bang at some point. Perhaps the 'credit crunch' will eventually kill of SKY subscriptions, doesn't seem to be a the moment though.
What will 9 million Sky subscribers/3 million Setanta sunscribers watch instead?
We could hit the depths of a recession in this country & football will still be, by far & away, the number one obsession & the comfort/security blanket for your average Joe. I think in harsh times, the Sky subscription would be the last thing to go.
I know you could look back at the 80's and the dire state football was in with the recession then - however now you have a much more accessible product thanks to Sky TV, a whole new generation of predominantly "Big 4" fans and an ingeniously, incessantly marketed product.
After the initial thrill is over for a City (or other) fan, what does it mean to them watching a player earning enough money to pay off your mortgage in one or two weeks in a game that is so result driven that deriving entertainment from the sport is now replaced by bragging rights?
I think it could just add up to bitterness from all directions in the end and all this money will just bring out the worst in people. This includes the reasons for why people will choose a club to support.
Although the de-humanising of the game saddens me, I know that I am not a surgeon with enough talent or power to help pull football's head out of it's own @rse so I busy my mind with other things. Runaway trains generally run out of track.
I first thought that you meant Charlton Life .........(!)