I thought Elliott and Randolph were considered virtually on a par with each other, but that Randolph happened to be second choice, do despite Elliott doing well before it seem like a sensible, if tough, decision by Pards to pick him. His mix up with Paddy cost him a dip in his confidence and standing amongst fans - loaning him out seems the correct decision to me.
I just had to check that Hereford were in League One. If anyone would have asked me that question before, I would've guessed they were in the conference. Weird.
or maybe he gave randolph the option of either being no 2 and more than likely playin less than 5 games this season, or going out on loan for the season and get 30+ games under his belt??
makes sense him goin out on loan, with a recall clause and actually playin
[cite]Posted By: LargeAddick[/cite]makes Pards decision to play him over Elliott against Southampton all the more bizarre.
But after the Liverpool game every one was saying he should be our 1st choice keeper, so it made sense that he should play his 2nd game when the opportunity next came up.
[cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]Can I just say that............
Comments
Leaves us with two keepers, and one we can call back in an emergency
it certainly does.
makes sense him goin out on loan, with a recall clause and actually playin
Because he was our No 2 GK? :S
YOU READ ABOUT IT ON THE OS FIRST
But after the Liverpool game every one was saying he should be our 1st choice keeper, so it made sense that he should play his 2nd game when the opportunity next came up.
Nah I read it here first!!!