I noticed on the Thatcher/ Holland post that NLA thinks we should sell Weaver. I'd be really disappointed if he went. He hardly did a thing wrong all season bar a silly sending off, and certainly won me round as I was not keen at all when we signed him. I could imagine a Prem club coming in for him, but if we have any ambition to do better next season, we have to hang on to him. Elliott may be OK as a number two, but still has a lot to learn, and I've never been convinced by Randolph.
Thoughts?
0
Comments
i think Weaver has done fine for us i am just looking at players that have a return value unfortunatly Weaver has that i would say and i think it might be worth cashing in on him,
its going to be the curbs adage of improving the whole squad instead of improving in areas of the squad like we did in years 4,5 of the prem
Weaver is competent and as things stand we need his experience. I put my hand up to thinking Pards should have saved money and gone with Randolph and Elliott back in the summer after Randolph's fine game at Liverpool. The Southampton game demonstrated how premature that was! If we seriously want promotion next season then we need a confident, competent number 1 and Weaver fits that bill. Elliott and Randolph (Southampton cock up aside!) are both improving and will push him harder. I have no worries about either of them deputising for one off games but I'm not sure either is ready to be first choice for 46 games.
I understand your cash in point but if it is accepted neither Elliott or Randolph are yet ready to be first choice surely we would have to spend to replace him?
People moaned when we "cashed in" on Reid and given his dodgy fitness record there was more justification then.
If next season we are to get promoted or at least challenge then we need a far more solid defence and Weaver can play an important part in that.