Having an argument at the moment with a few West Ham fans re: Curbs.
The injury crisis is massive, with half the fans blaming Curbs and the other half saying 'it's just one of those things'.
Was curbishley's squad often filled with copious amounts of injured players towards the end of his reign.
Just really need to settle this argument as it's been dragging on for weeks now!
Thanks for all responses in advance.
0
Comments
But I do think we seemed to end up with a lot of 'training ground' injuries eg somewhat self inflicted.
We did lose some great players to injury and illness but I dont think you can blame Curbs for that.
I do seem to remember us having a lot of stupid injuries at one time to the point where you actually wondered if the physio staff were all the ticket.
Boring mid-table Prem football anyone???
NO THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!
THAT IS NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
I'm old enough to remember 1984, the Selhurst years, even the first few years back at the Valley - all not great. This is nothing in comparison. Sure you should always try to look forward rather than back, but sometimes a bit of perspective is needed.
The bank manager for one!
;o)
The reason for the long injury list at West Ham may have something to do with the fact they actively signed a series of players with poor injury records.
It is my understanding that our former head physio is now also at the Hamsters which may or may not be a coincidence given the long term injuries they have had.
he does love to get his excuses in first does old Curbs
agree with the comments that he bought a long list of players with poor injury records - Upson, Dyer, Bellamy is three to start it and Parker - having never been injured with us - spent a lot of time on the sidelines at Newcastle and Chelsea