JT for me. I think Ambrose does not contribute enough and Lloyds end product is not there. I feel whenever JT gets the ball something productive is gonna happen!
Wingers/ wide creative players are by nature inconsistent and go missing for long spells (unless they are called Christiano Ronaldo). Ambrose has been the most effective of the three by quite a long way, Sam tries his best and JT is little more than a show pony.
Ambrose because what he does well outweighs the weak side of his game. If he didn't have the weak side he would be a regular prem player IMHO. Sam is making too many wrong decisions and Thomas threatens without delivering.
Oh dear, I must still be getting over Friday as looked at the title of this thread and thought "who is Jerome Lloyd..." Ambrose most effective, but I really like what a confident Lloyd can do.
[cite]Posted By: aliwibble[/cite]At the moment, at their best or on average?
At the moment Ambrose, at their best Thomas, on average? I really couldn't say.
Comments
(i chose Ambrose)
the other two were 'carried' by ZZ and Holland Friday night and in my view have got off a bit lightly after being so bad..
At least Ambrose has scored and set up more than the other two combined!
Wingers/ wide creative players are by nature inconsistent and go missing for long spells (unless they are called Christiano Ronaldo). Ambrose has been the most effective of the three by quite a long way, Sam tries his best and JT is little more than a show pony.
Thomas could be good and Sam just can't seem to get the final ball right. Ambrose although inconsistent can change a game on his own.
Ambrose 12
Sam 4
Thomas 4
At the moment Ambrose, at their best Thomas, on average? I really couldn't say.
pass!
MCS, remove the fence post from your arse and make a choice....:-)