Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK: CHARLTON 0-3 WIGAN

lancashire lad
Posts: 15,626
many thanks to the 58 Lifers who gave marks, not bad for a Tuesday night









4
Comments
-
Thanks, I hadn't noticed how poorly Bury have been playing, as much was expected with their signings in the summer
Holmes and JFC are in a race to see who can get suspended first...2 -
Thought Forster-Caskey's booking last night was harshkillerandflash said:Thanks, I hadn't noticed how poorly Bury have been playing, as much was expected with their signings in the summer
Holmes and JFC are in a race to see who can get suspended first...0 -
Must be the first time Kashi has been in the bottom half let alone bottom.1
-
Thanks, Lancs.
Fascinating to see two centre halves and goalie making up top three when we lose 3-0!5 -
Interesting comparison to last season.
Shots on target more or less the same, but more goals scored.
Definitely more undisciplined as fouls, yellow and red cards increase - not that this worries me apart from Holmes and Forster-Caskey getting nearer to suspension.
Possession the same but shows that, ultimately, possession means little as we have 6 points more than last season.1 -
This.Weegie Addick said:Thanks, Lancs.
Fascinating to see two centre halves and goalie making up top three when we lose 3-0!0 -
I think if you're the referee you have to give that. He went sliding in out of control with two feet. I was actually a little worried he'd see straight red, which would have been very harsh. I don't think he meant it, I think he completely lost his footing and just kind of bundled his way into Morsy (I think it was).Addick in SW16 said:
Thought Forster-Caskey's booking last night was harshkillerandflash said:Thanks, I hadn't noticed how poorly Bury have been playing, as much was expected with their signings in the summer
Holmes and JFC are in a race to see who can get suspended first...0 -
thanks to Seriously Red I can conform an error in the comparison table
shots on/off should have read: 39/600 -
And to think, we pay you for this type of shoddy performancelancashire lad said:thanks to Seriously Red I can conform an error in the comparison table
shots on/off should have read: 39/60
Thanks LL, always appreciated.2 -
Thanks, Lancs. Appreciated as ever!
Kashi didn't play 97 mins.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Yeah, he came off at 70 with Fosu-Henry, right?Addickted2TheReds said:Thanks, Lancs. Appreciated as ever!
Kashi didn't play 97 mins.0 -
yes 70mins , I'll alter my copy. One week sometime in the future I might, just might not make a mistake, ah well gives you all something to look for, and thanks for doing so, just worried AFKA will reduce my emoluments.Addickted2TheReds said:Thanks, Lancs. Appreciated as ever!
Kashi didn't play 97 mins.2 -
Always feel bad about mentioning any slight mistakes considering the amazing effort you put in, but gather that you would rather know than not!1
-
Holmes discipline is shocking...1
-
Magennis 6.22, that's got to improve!0