Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Against League 3 - Club Owner Survey - ROLAND NAMED WORST OWNER IN ENGLISH FOOTBALL (pg 2)
Scoham
Posts: 37,462
Comments
-
Done0
-
Done.
Can't believe how angry you can get typing in a comments box !!1 -
All filled out.0
-
Done0
-
Done0
-
Done0
-
Done0
-
Done. Easy multiple choice score format. But then gets a bit tricky at the end. Have to use submit button at the bottom, but can also 'post comment' which is confusing. Anyway submission was acknowledged so seems to have gone through.1
-
Done.0
-
Done.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Never heard of 'against league 3' before - survey completed with some flattering comments for our SMT0
-
Done0
-
5
-
Is there an award in the offing for this? Need to keep it going. Probably competing with Leeds with their bigger fan base.0
-
Done0
-
Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.0
-
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?0 -
The SMT are voting tooBriston_Addick said:
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?3 -
1.04 and trending downwards, as far as my contribution is concerned.1
-
Done!0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Done0
-
This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?Briston_Addick said:
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?0 -
Done.0
-
That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.Fumbluff said:
This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?Briston_Addick said:
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
2 -
Done.0
-
OuchPragueAddick said:
That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.Fumbluff said:
This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?Briston_Addick said:
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?0 -
I did the same.PragueAddick said:
That would be me. For the finance question. I mean, we are not going to go into administration whatever else happens. Everyone should read this about our visitors on Saturday.Fumbluff said:
This means someone has inadvertently given them a 2/10 on one of the criteria. Tsk. Tsk. Couldn't see the current scores after I'd submitted though, has it changed?Briston_Addick said:
I'm surprised.stonemuse said:Done, we seem to have the worst rating so far ...no surprise.
How the hell have they scored as high as 1.04?
Gave them a 5 I think, because financially we're not in trouble - but the way the money has been spent and the debt we're incurring to Roland is still concerning.0 -
5 ffs! The debt is concerning, ffs? You apologist, you!2
-
Done with great pleasure.0
-
Mea culpa. I gave them a 1 for everything except a 2 for finances as I don't think RD will ever see his investment returned.1

















