Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK - Burnley 3-0 Charlton

lancashire lad
Posts: 15,626
Many thanks to the 12 Lifers who gave marks, here are the stats:
here:https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/36/13bd1b830b65b577b137396b6a6a5d.pdf
here:https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/36/13bd1b830b65b577b137396b6a6a5d.pdf
0
Comments
-
Interesting stats LL and I would say pretty much how I saw the game .. they highlight where our REAL problems lie .. midfield0
-
LL - if Kerm came on for Stewart I think one of their minutes must be wrong unless we played with 10 men a while.
As for the stats I wonder why Pritch's form has tailed off?
Also shows how much we miss Yann!0 -
would be interesting to correlate the cumulative mark of players with the total time played, inserting a corrective factor . ( like: the mark*played time/ 60), otherwise a player with only 1 game and high mark could be rated as the "best player of the season" .0
-
@premierleague
there are qualifying levels of appearance to be in the running of player of the season. See the end of season Statbank if you've not already seen
http://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/55411/the-bumper-2012-13-charlton-life-statbank-your-complete-guide-to-charlton-stats0 -
thanks Redman, Stewart should have been 87 minutes, can't read my own writtingredman said:LL - if Kerm came on for Stewart I think one of their minutes must be wrong unless we played with 10 men a while.
As for the stats I wonder why Pritch's form has tailed off?
Also shows how much we miss Yann!0