Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
***Sonny Carey signs a three year deal***
Comments
-
Jones does try to use him as a 10, but that’s clearly not what he is.Scoham said:
NJ uses him as a 10 though, and Knibbs and Berry have similar qualities in that they’re hard workers over traditional playmaking 10s who offer flair and creativity but are weaker defensively.The Red Robin said:
I’d say Carey is more of an 8. A 10 is the creative player we don’t have. I’ve no concerns with Carey. We’ve seen he can do it previously, he’ll do it again. It’s not like the team have been performing around him either. Wouldn’t mind seeing him and JRC together.Scoham said:
He’s an NJ 10 and an upgrade Berry. Both work hard and have a good shot. Decent on the ball but neither are playmakers who add creative passing and flair.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:The issue I have with Carey is, for a centre attacking midfielder he really isn’t very creative. He doesn’t impose himself or is influential in a game for the forwards to thrive as he is to busy always looking to drive and have a shot.
Carey is quicker and more agile, he can drive forward with the ball, something Berry didn’t offer in L1, never mind at this level.
Knibbs is in a similar mould, known for his goalscoring and work rate at Reading.
Hopefully Fullah comes back into the squad, he’s the closest we have to a more technical 10, and on top of that he adds pace to the team. NJs said himself once Fullah goes into the team he probably doesn’t come back out. I get the feeling he doesn’t want to be forced to leave Knibbs or Berry out from the squad for an 18 year old, but sooner than later he’s going to have to.
Only way NJ uses a more typical 10 is if they have that work rate and aggression. There won’t be many players who offer both at this level.0 -
It’s worked hasn’t it? He’s been an improvement on Berry, Gilbert and anyone else who’s played there under Jones.The Red Robin said:
Jones does try to use him as a 10, but that’s clearly not what he is.Scoham said:
NJ uses him as a 10 though, and Knibbs and Berry have similar qualities in that they’re hard workers over traditional playmaking 10s who offer flair and creativity but are weaker defensively.The Red Robin said:
I’d say Carey is more of an 8. A 10 is the creative player we don’t have. I’ve no concerns with Carey. We’ve seen he can do it previously, he’ll do it again. It’s not like the team have been performing around him either. Wouldn’t mind seeing him and JRC together.Scoham said:
He’s an NJ 10 and an upgrade Berry. Both work hard and have a good shot. Decent on the ball but neither are playmakers who add creative passing and flair.000__Jaaaaay__000 said:The issue I have with Carey is, for a centre attacking midfielder he really isn’t very creative. He doesn’t impose himself or is influential in a game for the forwards to thrive as he is to busy always looking to drive and have a shot.
Carey is quicker and more agile, he can drive forward with the ball, something Berry didn’t offer in L1, never mind at this level.
Knibbs is in a similar mould, known for his goalscoring and work rate at Reading.
Hopefully Fullah comes back into the squad, he’s the closest we have to a more technical 10, and on top of that he adds pace to the team. NJs said himself once Fullah goes into the team he probably doesn’t come back out. I get the feeling he doesn’t want to be forced to leave Knibbs or Berry out from the squad for an 18 year old, but sooner than later he’s going to have to.
Only way NJ uses a more typical 10 is if they have that work rate and aggression. There won’t be many players who offer both at this level.3 -
His best performances have been as a 10 and his worst have been as an 8 with Knibbs as a 10. Surely that tells you his best position in this system is at 10?10
-
My wife misses his good performances6
-
So do I, was enjoying my quiet evenings in!!cantersaddick said:My wife misses his good performances5 -
He's had a deserved rest but needs to come back in instead of Berry. Always feel that Berry is more effective as a sub.2




