Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1187188190192193219

Comments

  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,839
    Just the minuscule target of 435 to chase
  • We couldn’t, could we?
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,459
    Fair play to England. Now just win it 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    Boland c&b Archer.

    Only need 435 to win. 


  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    We could be chasing 150 and I’d still back the Aussies. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    Small victory to take the 20 wickets in the Test and not letting them get to 500 ahead and declare 5 or 6 down.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    Betfair Exchange

    Australia 1.18 (85%)
    England 7.2 (14%)
    Draw 48 (2%)
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    Betfair Exchange

    Australia 1.18 (85%)
    England 7.2 (14%)
    Draw 48 (2%)
    That's 101%. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    Only need ten 44 run partnerships.

    10/2 at lunch anyone.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    First over of Starc seen off

    0-0

  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    Betfair Exchange

    Australia 1.18 (85%)
    England 7.2 (14%)
    Draw 48 (2%)
    That's 101%. 
    Do you want the decimal points Mr. Pedant?
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    Duckett gone second ball

    Nothing shot to slip

    4-1
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,839
    Appalling from Duckett
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,459
    Yup well in Ben
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    Ben Duckett has been nothing short of an embarrassment this series. 

    Pathetic batting. What was that?
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,839
    At least we have a chance of the entertainment of seeing Pope try to make a start twice
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    No need to play at that. But it's ok because Duckett doesn't leave balls to go through to the keeper. He plays at everything. 
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    edited December 2025
    If Pope survives to lunch he’d have exceeded expectations. 
  • Poor shot that. Yet another England wicket, where the batsman hasn't taken account of the extra bounce here 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    That's it. 

    Now do some gardening. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    5-1 at lunch.

    Aus need 9 wickets

    Eng need 430 runs
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    Pathetic. 

    Cant even last 2 overs without losing a wicket. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 13,839
    Duckett is an odd one because realistically he can't play any other way. If England do decide to switch to a more traditional style of play he won't keep getting selected for long
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    5-1 at lunch.

    Aus need 9 wickets

    Eng need 430 runs
    Crawley - 125
    Pope - 7
    Root - 140
    Brook - 37 (off of only 15 balls)
    Stokes - 100
    Smith - 58 

    Looks easy when you think about realistic scores for each of our batsmen. Just need some consistency. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,568
    First thing we need to do is to take the game into the 5th day. There is supposedly some rain due tomorrow. Probably not much but who knows. The protective covers might rip & the wicket gets water on it. Or a couple of Aussie players get taken ill with the trots.
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    Pope has achieved his projected 7 runs so I’d argue we’re well on track.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    31-2

    It was coming. Very good catch from Labuschagne at second slip and Pope is gone for 17.
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,904
    Last of Pope hopefully.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    44-2 at the first bowling change after 12 overs
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,810
    49-2, 14 ovs at the drinks break

    Crawley 9 (37)
    Root 9 (18)