Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

After the Millwall game - club response to CAST p34

13233343537

Comments

  • BalladMan said:
    Done. Do you know the email address we should be using to contact the police ? The club mentioned a form that was 'here' on their announcement responding to card yesterday but i can't see it - if you or anybody else knows where that is or what other method i can use to ensure my email ends up at the right police person that would be appreciated. I don't do twitter or anything else like that.
  • aliwibble said:
    DOUCHER said:
    aliwibble said:
    DOUCHER said:
    when you don't ask the right questions, you allow bland generic bollox like that to be the answer - 'take it up with the police, we're not telling you the reason why we rolled over and allowed our home fans to be fucked over again at the expense of millwall fans and you never asked us that anyway so why would we offer that information up' - cast, your useless. 
    Why do you keep giving CAST grief for the fuckups of the Police and the club? The obvious answer to why the club "rolled over" and didn't keep the Millwall fans in is that they needed the Police agreement to do that. Or were you expecting the stewards to keep 3000 pissed off Millwall fans in the Jimmy Seed without any police support? Would we even have had a safety certificate for the match if we didn't agree the policing arrangements for the game with the Met? And the club has no control over how the Police decide to deal with fans once they've left the ground.
    Given that a similar stupid strategy appears to have been used at Palace v Millwall that seems to indicate that the driving force behind the decision was the Met and not the club. The club has handled (and continues to handle) the communications very poorly, could possibly have done better with stewarding by the gate that got broken through, but the bigger villain of the piece is whichever idiot in the Met decided that this was a good plan. 
    because nowhere in any of your questions have u asked why they, the police, thought that would be the right solution when iot doesn't happen at any other ground? the club must know the answer to that surely? this wouldn't happen in a rangers celtic, villa birmingham or man utd liverpool match so how the hell has it been allowed to happen here - again ? useless   
    My questions? I'm only a random supporter not a member of the CAST board, and they have asked the Police why the decision was taken not to hold the visiting supporters back when that's what is usually done. I'm just puzzled by you continually directing your frustration at fellow fans that are trying to get answers on our behalf, rather than the people who made the decisions in the first place. 
    My mistake re you and cast. But surely its obvious - CAST have a platform, a voice that should be heard and represent us hence my exasperation with them missing the main point- i have sent an email to the club, and am looking for the contact details for the police. I'll also fill out the survey.  
  • I used my recent direct contact with Tom Rubashow to let him know that that tin-eared response has landed very badly on Charlton Life, I highlighted the specific lines that most people find most inadequate, and specifically regarding follow up with the police, I wrote 

     "It is not enough to just ask fans to use a contact form for the Metropolitan police. There needs to be a frank dialogue with the specific officers who imposed this process on the club, and need to be held accountable for the results. "

    I hope that this passes the @DOUCHER test!😉
    1) Where is the frigging form ?
    2) If you want anything done properly, you have to do it yourself is probably the truest saying in existence
  • I responded to one question by ticking the "Season ticket holder" box only to be asked, on the next question, whether or not I intend to attend any more home games.

    Does anyone review correspondence before it's sent out?
    A poorly thought out communication reflects so badly on the sender.


    Perhaps they think some fans might be so disgusted that they'll cut up their season ticket.
  • Sponsored links:


  • image
    image

    Your opinion can help shape the future of The Valley experience!

     

    Thank you for joining us at The Valley last weekend when we faced off against local rivals Millwall — we hope you enjoyed the occasion and felt the incredible atmosphere of a Charlton matchday!

    We’re always looking for ways to make the matchday experience even better, and your thoughts are very important to us.

    It only takes a couple of minutes to share your feedback, and it will help us make sure your next visit is even more memorable.

    Click here or the 'POST MATCH SURVEY' button below to complete our short survey about your matchday experience.

     

    Click here or the 'F&B SURVEY' button to share your feedback on our matchday Food and Beverage offerings.

     

    We appreciate your time and hope to see you back at The Valley soon!

    Up the Addicks,
    Charlton Athletic Football Club

    POST MATCH SURVEY
    F&B SURVEY

    THIS IS THE SURVEY CLUB HAVE SENT OUT ON EMAIL THIS MORNING ! 
    SORT OF UNBELEIVABLE BUT BELIEVABLE ? 
  • edited 11:40AM
    Who is in charge of comms this is an insult ? 
    hopefully the club will get it in neck on this survey for Saturdays debacle....
  • Who is in charge of comms this is an insult ? 
    hopefully the club will get it in neck on this survey for Saturdays debacle....
    Tom Rubashow is head of comms. 

  • Who is in charge of comms this is an insult ? 
    hopefully the club will get it in neck on this survey for Saturdays debacle....
    https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/75662/welcome-tom-rubashow-new-cafc-head-of-comms/p10
  • Right - i've emailed the club, done the survey and filled out a police complaints form - lets see what happens now 
  • Unless I am missing something the police in their response to Richard Cawley said they had ‘worked alongside CAFC’.
    So the decisions were joint ones, and who exactly is the person at the club they ‘worked alongside’?
    I am assuming that the word ‘worked’ means that someone put time and effort and resources into reaching any decision.
    Must have taken all of 10 seconds ‘work’ to reach the bad decisions.
  • DOUCHER said:
    aliwibble said:
    DOUCHER said:
    aliwibble said:
    DOUCHER said:
    when you don't ask the right questions, you allow bland generic bollox like that to be the answer - 'take it up with the police, we're not telling you the reason why we rolled over and allowed our home fans to be fucked over again at the expense of millwall fans and you never asked us that anyway so why would we offer that information up' - cast, your useless. 
    Why do you keep giving CAST grief for the fuckups of the Police and the club? The obvious answer to why the club "rolled over" and didn't keep the Millwall fans in is that they needed the Police agreement to do that. Or were you expecting the stewards to keep 3000 pissed off Millwall fans in the Jimmy Seed without any police support? Would we even have had a safety certificate for the match if we didn't agree the policing arrangements for the game with the Met? And the club has no control over how the Police decide to deal with fans once they've left the ground.
    Given that a similar stupid strategy appears to have been used at Palace v Millwall that seems to indicate that the driving force behind the decision was the Met and not the club. The club has handled (and continues to handle) the communications very poorly, could possibly have done better with stewarding by the gate that got broken through, but the bigger villain of the piece is whichever idiot in the Met decided that this was a good plan. 
    because nowhere in any of your questions have u asked why they, the police, thought that would be the right solution when iot doesn't happen at any other ground? the club must know the answer to that surely? this wouldn't happen in a rangers celtic, villa birmingham or man utd liverpool match so how the hell has it been allowed to happen here - again ? useless   
    My questions? I'm only a random supporter not a member of the CAST board, and they have asked the Police why the decision was taken not to hold the visiting supporters back when that's what is usually done. I'm just puzzled by you continually directing your frustration at fellow fans that are trying to get answers on our behalf, rather than the people who made the decisions in the first place. 
    My mistake re you and cast. But surely its obvious - CAST have a platform, a voice that should be heard and represent us hence my exasperation with them missing the main point- i have sent an email to the club, and am looking for the contact details for the police. I'll also fill out the survey.  

    I realise that I'm probably wasting my time, but hey ho - did you not see the email sent to the police from CAST? What main point was missing from that email? Genuine question.
  • edited 12:25PM

    This survey is a joke...its as if Millwall was a normal match day experience?
    asks you will you come to next match, Of course i will......nothing specific about what happened apart from 2 comments boxes to allow fans to have their say
    ....in essence what was bad and what can be improved! 
  • https://x.com/CAFCFanAdviser/status/1968630425703579867?t=P31e7ASFhm7L_jhZDErUJg&s=19

    The Fans Advisors have finally put something on X. Unlike the Trust and Jon they have ignored the post I @ to them on Monday.

    Why be involved in fan engagement and then not engage?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Let’s be honest, if we were in the mental US of A the fan assaulted on the steps between the East and the JS would have already started his litigation against the club and the 5-oh for their negligence and utter bellendedness of the highest order….
    Maybe we should start a gofundme for him?
    Anyone know a good lawyer?


  • Christ, who wrote that ‘survey’? That wouldn’t pass as an assignment in any Uni on a research methods course. It looks like a ‘first go’ but if it’s a survey on people’s experience of Saturday there’s no way it should be signed off to go out. 
  • Christ, who wrote that ‘survey’? That wouldn’t pass as an assignment in any Uni on a research methods course. It looks like a ‘first go’ but if it’s a survey on people’s experience of Saturday there’s no way it should be signed off to go out. 
    Looks like a generic chat gpt load of bullshit 
  • I'd just skip all the questions and use the box at the end to share your feelings about the game. That survey is actually such a slap in the face and clearly has no intentions of learning anything about what actually happened, it's an insult. 
  • The survey is a joke rushed out by a student I would suggest, once again off the pitch is going backwards.
  • That is a very poor response. Note that it does not say that the police made the decision not to keep the Millwall fans behind. That needs to be interrogated.
    One of the coppers outside the club shop told me that it was the club's decision to get the Millwall fans out first and was agreeing with us that it was wrong to inconvenience 20,000 home fans.
  • It shouldn't actually be hard to find out who's decision it was for each significant feature of the 'crowd management', though so far it seems to be. We were possibly closer to a tragic incident than some people realise. We have reports of a police horse charging around among fans, cars in crowded areas, slow moving congested pedestrian areas, car stuck on level crossing, and other scenarios, all owing to this set of decisions. In any event surely after Hillsborough etc there's a log of decisions so that accountability cannot be evaded.
  • Is the survey actually specific / uniquely relevant to the Millwall fixture or just a ‘post event’ type thing they may do in this day and age  from time to time?

    My point being whether created due to issues or just a thing they were planning anyway? 
  • Is the survey actually specific / uniquely relevant to the Millwall fixture or just a ‘post event’ type thing they may do in this day and age  from time to time?

    My point being whether created due to issues or just a thing they were planning anyway? 
    Almost certainly generic and only sent to a % of fans.  
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!