Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

POST-MATCH THREAD: Charlton Athletic v Millwall: Saturday 13th September 2025: KO 12:30pm

17810121316

Comments

  • edited September 13
    Ramsay, Nathan Jones and Leaburn threw that away for us. 

    Easily the best Charlton performance against Millwall in a very, very long time. Well on top for most of the game, especially the first half, should have made it count more at 1-0 up.

    Cannot argue either of Ramsay’s yellows, especially the second, no idea what he was thinking. Just let the play go. 

    Nathan Jones panicked. Should have left Campbell or Apter on, absolutely no outlet, it was inevitable they’d score at that point. They couldn’t handle Campbell at all, he was brilliant, suicidal to substitute him. 

    Leaburn either isn’t interested, is lazy, or injured. Absolutely zero effort to close the initial attack down which led to their goal. I would be he’s off in January and that a deal is already done. 
    This.

    I said earlier that the subs were all wrong. No pace left on the pitch & Leaburn still looks like his father, but without the heading ability.
    So what were the right subs, and what was the guarantee that they were going to work? - Don't just say you'd replace Ramsay for Burke either, because Jones was on a booking as well, and was sensible enough not to get sent off
    I would have brought Oalafe on for Kelman and not taken Raptor off. 

    I like to be brave when going down to 10 men. Not bring on defenders & sit back & defend the 1-0. At least have some pace up top so if the ball gets cleared then we have half a change of a counter attack, or set the very least relieve the pressure instead of the ball just coming straight back. Which it did.

    But in the end we didn't win because we didnt score the 2nd once we went ahead. That is going to be our downfall this season & a great possibility that we will get relegated.

    We had a lot of possession but, as usual, our crossing was atrocious. Cross after cross headed away by their first man. I dont think any of them found a red shirt. I was surprised we scored from a corner as they are now reverting to type after the opening few games of the season. 

    5 points after 5 games, 3 at home. Not good enough.
    Where is the guarantee that would have worked then? - Sorry, we cant sit back and say with confidence that the subs were wrong, when we have no idea that the way we suggest would have been at all successful... Or worse


  • The question I have got is why have we signed Kelman? This isn’t a slight on Kelman, we just don’t play a style of play which suits him. He could have played for three hours and not scored today. I just don’t know what the plan with Kelman is, we looked so much more dangerous when Leaburn came on and he now deserves to start.



    I’ve been too nervous to say this - I’ve been thinking that maybe I’m missing something. If he receives the ball on the ground around the box, he’s dangerous.  I feel sorry for him playing in our team receiving high balls. Today we did play it on the ground in the final third more often but we need to do it as a matter of course to see the real Kelman.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Gutted but win or lose on the booze 
    So pissed you've got double vision ;)
  • BalladMan said:
    Wonder whats going in with Knibbs. Reading have fallen apart without him but he barely gets a look in. Lack of pre-season surely no longer an excuse. Feel he would make a difference to the creativity in midfield. 
    Would you leave out Carey then for Knibbs
  • Gutted but win or lose on the booze 
    What about when we draw?
  • I've seen in some quarters, people I thought somewhat in the know, tipping the great unwashed as a good bet for promotion.

    On todays evidence...not a f******g chance!!

  • I like to be brave when going down to 10 men. 

    I had heard that about you
    😂😂😂
  • Sponsored links:


  • TC, Carey and Kelman all very good.
    Cov, Doc, Jones and Bell all good. 
    Ramsay brain fade but he has loads of brownie points.

    if Millwall are the standard for a decent upper mid table championship side, then we will be an upper mid table championship side. We were better than them in all departments for 80 minutes. Harsh lessons learned today but we’ll be fine this year 

  • Thought that we actually played some decent football at times in the first half.
    Lots of our attacks seemed to breakdown when Apter got the ball, as he was off the pace today.
    Edwards also gave the ball away lots of times with long balls that went to their goalkeeper.
    Reckon that they’d have scored even if we hadn’t of gone down to ten men, as we were just sitting back far too much in the second half.
    Goalkeeper worries me, as he hardly ever decides to venture off of his line.
    Campbell, Carey & Doc were our standouts.
  • 2121 sa
    id:
    Set-pieces are awful and the number one thing I want us to work on. 
    Couldnt understand our tactic of crossing or long ball with the three smallest players on the pitch up front 

    Their defence won everything in the air. 
  • sam3110 said:
    BalladMan said:
    Wonder whats going in with Knibbs. Reading have fallen apart without him but he barely gets a look in. Lack of pre-season surely no longer an excuse. Feel he would make a difference to the creativity in midfield. 
    The man he replaces has been possibly our best player this season so far in Carey. If you drop Docherty for him, the midfield get vastly overran 
    But switch at 70 when Carey is blowing and give him some time to show what he can do.  Maybe it will come.  
  • Very easy to say in retrospect, but I wish we pushed for that second goal to kill the game off while we were 1-0 up with 11 men on the pitch because I think we would have got it
  • Croydon said:
    TC, Carey and Kelman all very good.
    Cov, Doc, Jones and Bell all good. 
    Ramsay brain fade but he has loads of brownie points.

    if Millwall are the standard for a decent upper mid table championship side, then we will be an upper mid table championship side. We were better than them in all departments for 80 minutes. Harsh lessons learned today but we’ll be fine this year 

    Not really a fair representation of them with so many injuries.
     
    I admire your confidence, but there's no way we are an upper mid table championship side. Not based on today, or our previous games. 
    Agreed.  But we need to come 20th to achieve our aim this season and currently on track.  
  • BalladMan said:
    Croydon said:
    TC, Carey and Kelman all very good.
    Cov, Doc, Jones and Bell all good. 
    Ramsay brain fade but he has loads of brownie points.

    if Millwall are the standard for a decent upper mid table championship side, then we will be an upper mid table championship side. We were better than them in all departments for 80 minutes. Harsh lessons learned today but we’ll be fine this year 

    Not really a fair representation of them with so many injuries.
     
    I admire your confidence, but there's no way we are an upper mid table championship side. Not based on today, or our previous games. 
    Agreed.  But we need to come 20th to achieve our aim this season and currently on track.  
    2 points in the last 4 games though. 

    Started the season strong but now struggling to get results from games that are very winnable. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!