Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Deadline Day from Pg.641 - Summer 2025 Charlton Athletic Transfer Rumours
Comments
-
Other cheeses are availableNabySarr said:
We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit.golfaddick said:
Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.NabySarr said:
He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this monthmendonca said:I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
Havent we learnt from the past. This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward1 -
1 -
Prove itCaptainRobbo said:
Other cheeses are availableNabySarr said:
We don’t desperately need this signing to go straight into the team, so I’d rather the better player than the player that’s fit.golfaddick said:
Which is why I'd prefer Ward who, according to reports, has played 3 league games this season.NabySarr said:
He picked up an injury in pre-season, should be back fit this monthmendonca said:I don’t think Bree has featured for Southampton at all this season. He wasn't named on the bench for the League Cup games either by the looks of it.
Havent we learnt from the past. This season it's been Knibbs, Kelman & Burke who haven't been match fit. Last season Godden didn't start the season as he wasnt fit. And we can go back to Ben Reeves too.Bree is miles better than Ward, I’d much rather have 7 months of Bree this season, than 8 months of Ward0 -
Tantosonfire_se7 said:Fofana going to Preston instead makes sense seeing we have so many strikers, they can guarantee more minutes
Especially it's nearer to the National Railway Museum.3 -
We need to Cram Berry into the team now to compliment Bree.19
-
Has anyone seen Bree-Willy?0
-
.ShootersHillGuru said:We need to Cram Berry into the team now to compliment Bree.
Perhaps Paul Bacon as player coach to complete the midfield?1 -
Oh no. Not cheesy willy puns.SEaddick92 said:Has anyone seen Bree-Willy?0 -
300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷♂️0
-
Shocking if we only get the one in6
-
Sponsored links:
-
Hearing that Ramsay could end up becoming Guehi's replacement... 500keastterrace6168 said:300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷♂️11 -
Is Guehi a type of cheese?9
-
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I dosouthamptonaddick said:
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.Lincsaddick said:
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1Crispywood said:
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the netLincsaddick said:
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is neededfenaddick said:
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?Lincsaddick said:
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceiveStarinnaddick said:I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
5 -
ForeverAddickted said:
Hearing that Ramsay could end up becoming Guehi's replacement... 500keastterrace6168 said:300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷♂️
3 -
Well you'll be pleased to know that we've already signed nineMrBurns said:Shocking if we only get the one in
12 -
Except it won't. I'm certain at no point, we will see a league game this season where Gillesphey, Z Mitchell, and Hobden all start together in defence. It's completely different scenario if say only Gillesphey has to come in to the starting 11.Lincsaddick said:
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be itsouthamptonaddick said:
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.Lincsaddick said:
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1Crispywood said:
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the netLincsaddick said:
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is neededfenaddick said:
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?Lincsaddick said:
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceiveStarinnaddick said:I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.2 -
Why they been saying that’s all was coming in for a few weeks …MrBurns said:Shocking if we only get the one in2 -
We’d have to be very unlucky for Hobden, Laqeretabua, Mitchell and Fullah to be part of our back five in the same league game. Especially if Bree joins today too.Lincsaddick said:
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I dosouthamptonaddick said:
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.Lincsaddick said:
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1Crispywood said:
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the netLincsaddick said:
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is neededfenaddick said:
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?Lincsaddick said:
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceiveStarinnaddick said:I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.4 -
Yep the guy from Walsall you have been promising the last week or so.RonnieMoore said:
Why they been saying that’s all was coming in for a few weeks …MrBurns said:Shocking if we only get the one in0 -
Oh I "get it" now.Lincsaddick said:
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I dosouthamptonaddick said:
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.Lincsaddick said:
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1Crispywood said:
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the netLincsaddick said:
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is neededfenaddick said:
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?Lincsaddick said:
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceiveStarinnaddick said:I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
All of our back five get injured in one game.
You're right that would be a concern 🙄3 -
Sponsored links:
-
3 hours to go. Come on Charlton let's get a couple in.
0 -
You're obviously a wise person. Your 'Holy shit' comment got more LOLs than my 'grater good' joke.Uboat said:
Holy shit. That was the pun! No joke, that was 100% the shit joke I decided not to post.thai malaysia addick said:
It was probably for the grater good.Uboat said:Just typed out a 6/10 cheese pun, but decided to delete instead of posting. Quite proud of myself.0 -
Can we all be mature and allow this story to breeze past us.0
-
I think you've managed to precis it well.eastterrace6168 said:300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷♂️0 -
ForeverAddickted said:
Hearing that Ramsay could end up becoming Guehi's replacement... 500keastterrace6168 said:300+ posts, nothin' sorted yet, and all we are ending up with is some cheesy guy called Bree...or have I missed something...🤷♂️
0 -
If you're suggesting Ronnie that Ramsay to Palace for 500k is a load of rubbish... Well... I take offence at that!!1
-
Pot and kettle springs to mind 😉ForeverAddickted said:If you're suggesting Ronnie that Ramsay to Palace for 500k is a load of rubbish... Well... I take offence at that!!2 -
Now to improve our attack xG please.1
-
sarcastic dickhead lol .. you can surely do better than that, or can't you ?southamptonaddick said:
Oh I "get it" now.Lincsaddick said:
BUT 'the defence for that game' will be the fall back or if/when the first choices are injured, suspended or sold .. if that fills you with confidence then so be it .. you might not 'get it' but I dosouthamptonaddick said:
Don't get why people include the Cambridge match as the defence for that game will never appear in a Championship fixture.Lincsaddick said:
get yer abacus out lol .. were you watching on Saturday ? ..3 conceded as well as the 'back ups' conceding 3 at high flying Cambridge .. total in 3 games =7, defo NOT 1Crispywood said:
Started to concede it’s been 1 game the only problem we have at the moment is putting the ball in the back of the netLincsaddick said:
according to R-C and his profile he is a 'play anywhere' all rounder .. AND I didn't say as a striker .. read carefully, I used the term 'compromise' to provide much needed support/cover for Edwards and as support for the striker(s), services which i m o Campbell fails to provide .. we are not scoring goals and have started to concede, change is neededfenaddick said:
You want to play someone who plays as CM or RWB as a striker?Lincsaddick said:
agreed .. Nathan's signed 2 quite expensive (for us) strikers yet is selecting last season's duo .. also, i m o playing both Campbell and Apter out wide is a luxury .. Nathan seems to be stuck with a defensive mindset yet plays with 2 'wingers' .. Rankin-Costello, who has shown little so far with limited chances, should be brought in on the left as a 'compromise', i.e. cover for Edwards and to replace Campbell, who as ever, flatters to deceiveStarinnaddick said:I have a feeling NJ doesn't know the best combination to play up front yet.
All of our back five get injured in one game.
You're right that would be a concern 🙄2 -
Bree ? .. yet another refugee from Nathan's Saints/Luton days .. are there no other defenders available ?3
