I have West Ham to go down before a ball was kicked they are a club that seem to think they don’t have to invest to stay in the premiership and just collect the money. I really do think unless there are big changes in the ownership they could really fall big time. Imagine the London stadium welcoming Fleetwood, Burton etc
Apart from Bowen & Paqeuta they are complete dog shit. Ward-Prowse & Soucek have to be the least mobile midfield partnership I can remember seeing in the premier league.
And the bloke they sacked has the best win ratio and points per game of the 13 that have managed West Ham in the Premier League. Only Avram Grant has a worse record than Potter.
I read a stat the new West Ham keeper has faced 11 shots in his first two games and conceded 8 goals. He plays like a subbuteo goalkeeper with no arms.
Looks like Nuno's days at Forest are numbered. Seemingly the tension behind the scenes is because of Edu who rejected a signing that Nuno really wanted and since then they've barely spoken. Edu has also made a couple of signings who are linked to his agent mate Kia Joorabchian.
Most Arsenal fans will tell you that Edu was pretty shit for them so i'm not sure why Forest wanted him, and not sure why he'd be given more of a say than the manager who took them from relegation battlers to Europe. Forest fans all love Nuno and would clearly rather see Edu leave instead.
That said, i think Nuno was probably wrong to publicly air the issues in a press conference. Just go and speak to the owner in private.
Edu will outlast Nuno because he's not employed directly by Forest. As far as I remember, he's head of football for every club the Forest owner has money invested in. No chance he's getting sacked if looking after all those clubs. They'll just get rid of Nuno instead, which is obviously a mistake.
This makes Tottenham bigger/better than Man City apparently. I don't make the rules.
Especially as Tottenham won a trophy and Man City didn't too.
LOL - bit touchy about your Arsenal aren't you? All depends if Spurs beat City 3/4 times in a season and win a trophy. 5 years since your team won one and you've spent £1 billion in that time trying to buy one.
This makes Tottenham bigger/better than Man City apparently. I don't make the rules.
Especially as Tottenham won a trophy and Man City didn't too.
LOL - bit touchy about your Arsenal aren't you? All depends if Spurs beat City 3/4 times in a season and win a trophy. 5 years since your team won one and you've spent £1 billion in that time trying to buy one.
No just showing how dumb your initial comment was about head-to-head mattering in a league format. Tottenham have beaten Man City (including today) 3 out of the last 4 times.
Comments
thats won a competition.
Probably thinking about how to update his CV positively.
Especially as Tottenham won a trophy and Man City didn't too.