This game is seen as much as a duty to the minor counties as it a chance to give experience to youngsters but, of those, I would be extremely surprised if Flintoff plays in the actual competition.
The two interesting selections are Compton because he wasn't picked for this fixture last season and that suggests the he will, unlike last year, be playing in the Metro which is probably one of the sticking points in his new contract. The other is the appearance of Mikey Cohen for the first time in an official first team match in the two seasons he's been with us.
And possibly Joe Denly too. A surprise is that Stewart is named given his injury in the game that only finished a few days ago prevented him from finishing the match. Perhaps that is why Finch has retained the captaincy after taking over from him in that game.
Sam Northeast is in talks with Glamorgan about extending his contract there. The only thing, reading this, that might influence him coming back to us is that he has just had a baby and whether that might have any bearing on him leaving.
Sam Northeast is in talks with Glamorgan about extending his contract there. The only thing, reading this, that might influence him coming back to us is that he has just had a baby and whether that might have any bearing on him leaving.
Finch and Stewart have been named joint captains for the Metro and Hollioake will continue to be Head Coach for the duration of the comp despite what might be going on elsewhere.
Interesting that DBD isn't the captain. Does that suggest he'll be out injured for a while, or that he might still get a 100 call up?
Probably both - that he might not be ready for the first game or two but then get a call up. It's not a bad thing to have a settled captain albeit we are doing it on a "job share" anyway.
Norfolk in reply 31-5 with Cohen taking 3-17 and Garrett 2-14. If only Cohen had been fit but at least he has the Metro to prove whether it is worth giving him another year.
A very interesting interview with Simon Cook before the one day cup. It sounds like we'll be trying to win it, rather than using it as a testing ground for players and tactics.
A very interesting interview with Simon Cook before the one day cup. It sounds like we'll be trying to win it, rather than using it as a testing ground for players and tactics.
A worthy aim from Cook but the fact is that we have no overseas when most teams have at least one and we are missing (the ones in bold would be in our first XI in my opinion) with only Finch, Klaassen, Parkinson and Evison making it from the above 13:
DBD Joe Denly Crawley Muyeye Billings Quinn O'Riordan Gilchrist Jas Singh Garrett Stewart
I very much see this as a competition to blood the youngsters, see where they sit in the pro game and give them that experience with anything beyond that an absolute bonus. The only one of those four youngsters I have particular reservations about ultimately making it is Flintoff (and will be thrilled to be proven wring) though I see Jaydn and Ekansh ahead of Dawkins albeit that they are a year older anyway.
Looks like perfect weather down here for tomorrow , Arundel is probably the prettiest out ground too
Sussex will probably be a mix and match side with a fair few young players , were comfortably beaten at Durham yesterday .
I notice Sussex are playing Middlesex at Lord's on Sunday. I hope the MCC can produce a better pitch than the insipid one for the Hundred last night.
I thought that was the idea of the Hundred? As few a number of deliveries with the associated as few a number of runs - 161 in total. Terrific value. For England's Test players anyway that are already centrally contracted and being lured to play in the Hundred for £25,000 a match when the Test fee is £15,000. Then, when it comes to them playing for their counties, the argument will be they they've played too much cricket!
Looks like perfect weather down here for tomorrow , Arundel is probably the prettiest out ground too
Sussex will probably be a mix and match side with a fair few young players , were comfortably beaten at Durham yesterday .
I notice Sussex are playing Middlesex at Lord's on Sunday. I hope the MCC can produce a better pitch than the insipid one for the Hundred last night.
I thought that was the idea of the Hundred? As few a number of deliveries with the associated as few a number of runs - 161 in total. Terrific value. For England's Test players anyway that are already centrally contracted and being lured to play in the Hundred for £25,000 a match when the Test fee is £15,000. Then, when it comes to them playing for their counties, the argument will be they they've played too much cricket!
I’m intrigued to see how many “Ashes” players play both in the Hundred and in the end of summer one day stuff . I suspect all and almost none respectively .
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
As mentioned by Killer, TW can't be used as its facilities and ground aren't up to scratch and neither the council and certainly not KCCC are willing to stump up the money to achieve that.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
why?
Better wicket (Beckenham) , more accessible to more Kent fans - that’s my conjecture - it may well not be true .
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
why?
Because an awful lot of supporters live nearer to Beckenham than Canterbury. I believe attendances would be higher. I'd probably buy an ST.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
why?
Better wicket (Beckenham) , more accessible to more Kent fans - that’s my conjecture - it may well not be true .
Both are true, Canterbury is a nightmare to get to and park but, then, Beckenham lacks the character in my opinion as it seems a bit lacking in soul. That said, for the Metro, it's probably the right call.
Leaving aside the competition itself, the pitch last night (I watched a bit of it) was terribly slow, making it almost impossible to play big shots, which is the whole point of white ball cricket in particular.
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Kent should play most of their games at Beckenham, in my view , with a couple each at Canterbury and TW.
As mentioned by Killer, TW can't be used as its facilities and ground aren't up to scratch and neither the council and certainly not KCCC are willing to stump up the money to achieve that.
I still think there's also a lack of will on Kent's part.
Why not play one of the Sunday 50 over games there as a test event? The facilities might be less nice for the players, but I imagine there would be a great crowd. And if the pitch wasn't good, it's not as if the ECB would take any action for what is clearly a competition of little importance to them
Comments
The two interesting selections are Compton because he wasn't picked for this fixture last season and that suggests the he will, unlike last year, be playing in the Metro which is probably one of the sticking points in his new contract. The other is the appearance of Mikey Cohen for the first time in an official first team match in the two seasons he's been with us.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/cwy5ew51qp8o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXb41GtDNjY...
For pure boundaries and wickets, it's best to use the Play Cricket site and click on "videos"
https://www.play-cricket.com/website/results/7108378
But looking further, saw he'd scored ELEVEN 6s plus 4 x 4s !
A very interesting interview with Simon Cook before the one day cup. It sounds like we'll be trying to win it, rather than using it as a testing ground for players and tactics.
DBD
Joe Denly
Crawley
Muyeye
Billings
Quinn
O'Riordan
Gilchrist
Jas Singh
Garrett
Stewart
I very much see this as a competition to blood the youngsters, see where they sit in the pro game and give them that experience with anything beyond that an absolute bonus. The only one of those four youngsters I have particular reservations about ultimately making it is Flintoff (and will be thrilled to be proven wring) though I see Jaydn and Ekansh ahead of Dawkins albeit that they are a year older anyway.
Sussex will probably be a mix and match side with a fair few young players , were comfortably beaten at Durham yesterday .
There's been a trend towards concentrating cricket in the major grounds, but pitches are getting overused and tired, and lack bounce as a result, not helped by modern drainage.
Kent won't go back to Tunbridge Wells because of concerns about the quality of the pitch and facilities, but the Canterbury pitches aren't that great anyway. So often they're really slow.
Why not play one of the Sunday 50 over games there as a test event? The facilities might be less nice for the players, but I imagine there would be a great crowd. And if the pitch wasn't good, it's not as if the ECB would take any action for what is clearly a competition of little importance to them