Charlie Kelmans fee won't look too excessive if his goals keep us up.
People are too concerned about money being spent that isn't theirs on players that improve us.
I can understand being frustrated at not spending fees, as going football and watching shit (most of the last 15 years or so) is very repetitive, but being concerned about us spending millions on players to help our cause doesn't make much sense. It's a positive.
If Kelman gets 10 goals next season then that will have been a major success.
I think that would depend on how many minutes he played, and his overall contribution. After all Bonne in 19/20 got 11 in the Championship.
And he was a major success. Bought for £200k from a non-league side, wasn’t expected to play as much as he did and nearly contributed enough to keep us up despite his lack of experience, and then was sold for 10x what we signed him for. If we hadn’t re-signed him it would have been a brilliant bit of work
Only played because of injuries didn't he ? (at least at first) Superb goal against Derby in the 3-0 stuffing
Charlie Kelmans fee won't look too excessive if his goals keep us up.
People are too concerned about money being spent that isn't theirs on players that improve us.
I can understand being frustrated at not spending fees, as going football and watching shit (most of the last 15 years or so) is very repetitive, but being concerned about us spending millions on players to help our cause doesn't make much sense. It's a positive.
I thought Burrell looked really good second half of the season for Burton - young too. I saw him as a better version of TC - similar attributes but he had more end product. Very interested to see how he gets on at QPR.
Charlie Kelmans fee won't look too excessive if his goals keep us up.
People are too concerned about money being spent that isn't theirs on players that improve us.
I can understand being frustrated at not spending fees, as going football and watching shit (most of the last 15 years or so) is very repetitive, but being concerned about us spending millions on players to help our cause doesn't make much sense. It's a positive.
Keep us up? Don't you mean get us up?
Whatever turns you on, I suppose...
Though we are clearly destined to dominate this season, or something.
Charlie Kelmans fee won't look too excessive if his goals keep us up.
People are too concerned about money being spent that isn't theirs on players that improve us.
I can understand being frustrated at not spending fees, as going football and watching shit (most of the last 15 years or so) is very repetitive, but being concerned about us spending millions on players to help our cause doesn't make much sense. It's a positive.
Lyle Taylor's goals would have kept us up if he had not gone on strike. He had never played in the Champ before either.
Comments
I think Kelman is a good player but that’s a steep price.
https://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/financial-fair-play-explained.php
I expect we're also cover it and grow our budget by selling a player or two for a big fee every so often.
But then again we clearly had the budget for him if we wanted to go there that much
People are too concerned about money being spent that isn't theirs on players that improve us.
I can understand being frustrated at not spending fees, as going football and watching shit (most of the last 15 years or so) is very repetitive, but being concerned about us spending millions on players to help our cause doesn't make much sense. It's a positive.
Signing a young striker to replace kelman... he looks about 45 🤣 how is he 28 lol
Though we are clearly destined to dominate this season, or something.