Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

UEFA EURO 2024

1…3536384041…97

Comments

  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,291
    Whoops
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    'Is he in eye-line?' 

    Yeah let's ignore that he's literally blocking the keeper from the ball next to him. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,291
    SELR_addicks said:
    'Is he in eye-line?' 

    Yeah let's ignore that he's literally blocking the keeper from the ball next to him. 
    Yeah thats ridiculous if its given
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    They aren't showing a replay because of how obvious it is or what? 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,291
    SELR_addicks said:
    They aren't showing a replay because of how obvious it is or what? 
    We've already seen a replay of it, they showed it straight away
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,840
    Very harsh offside that.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,593
    edited June 2024
    All the VAR decisions this tournament have been resolved quickly until it’s our turn to manage it.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,273
    Thing is, if he'd dived for the ball, and collided with Dumfries, the Dutch would probably be shouting for a pen.
  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
    Right decision.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,313
    SELR_addicks said:
    'Is he in eye-line?' 

    Yeah let's ignore that he's literally blocking the keeper from the ball next to him. 
    I know you support Arsenal, but why extend to France as well? Fucking ridiculous decision, keeper was never ever getting that 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,840
    VAR hasn't really been too much of a talking point this tournament.

    Enter the English ref team!
  • JoshrewCAFC
    JoshrewCAFC Posts: 916
    Disgraceful decision. If it takes that long to decide, you go with the on field decision.
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,778
    First VAR check to take too long to resolve and of course it’s when the officials are English. 
    Maybe we’re the problem! 😂
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,757
    Could have gone either way.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,994
    How did that take so long to decide? He was a good yard offside in the centre of the goal.
  • Clem_Snide
    Clem_Snide Posts: 11,736
    That's really harsh. The bloke given offside is walking away from the keeper. No way was that being saved whether he was there or not.

    No surprise that the first VAR decision which takes ages involves English officials and equally no shock that it's Stuart Attwell making the call.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,757
    JoshrewCAFC said:
    Disgraceful decision. If it takes that long to decide, you go with the on field decision.
    The on field decision was offside…
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    JoshrewCAFC said:
    Disgraceful decision. If it takes that long to decide, you go with the on field decision.
    To disallow the goal? That's what they decided. 
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,840
    Red_in_SE8 said:
    Right decision.
    Disagree
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,778
    JoshrewCAFC said:
    Disgraceful decision. If it takes that long to decide, you go with the on field decision.
    On field decision before VAR was offside.
    Ref gave the goal but Lino ruled it out. Then they went to VAR. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Off_it said:
    Red_in_SE8 said:
    Right decision.
    Disagree
    Thought you liked them sticking with the refs call?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,840
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    How did that take so long to decide? He was a good yard offside in the centre of the goal.

    He didn't play the ball though. Was he active, and affecting the French keeper, that's the decision to be made.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,840
    edited June 2024
    SELR_addicks said:
    Off_it said:
    Red_in_SE8 said:
    Right decision.
    Disagree
    Thought you liked them sticking with the refs call?
    But they didnt really make a decision did they. They passed the buck. Anyway, not going to get into an argument with one of the disciples about it.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,994
    killerandflash said:
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    How did that take so long to decide? He was a good yard offside in the centre of the goal.

    He didn't play the ball though. Was he active, and affecting the French keeper, that's the decision to be made.
    Of course he's active, he's standing in the the middle of the 6 yard box.

    Pretty clear cut offside for me, but some of the posts on here show what a difficult decision they have some times, as clearly quite a few of us can't agree what was the right call.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,757
    I probably would’ve gone with goal myself but see why it was disallowed, and understand why the VAR didn’t overrule the on field decision
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Off_it said:
    SELR_addicks said:
    Off_it said:
    Red_in_SE8 said:
    Right decision.
    Disagree
    Thought you liked them sticking with the refs call?
    But they didnt really make a decision did they. They passed the buck. Anyway, not going to get into an argument with one of the disciples about it.
    The flag literally went up. 

    If there was no VAR the goal would've still been disallowed. 
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,840
    edited June 2024
    lordromford said:
    JoshrewCAFC said:
    Disgraceful decision. If it takes that long to decide, you go with the on field decision.
    On field decision before VAR was offside.
    Ref gave the goal but Lino ruled it out. Then they went to VAR. 
    Yeah, but the linesman only raised his flag because he was in an offside position knowing full well that it would be checked. The linesman couldn't tell from there if he was interfering or not. It was a cop out.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 35,994
    Would've been better for us if the goal had been given as then France would likely end up group runners up and in the other half of the draw (assuming we win our group of course).
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,291
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Would've been better for us if the goal had been given as then France would likely end up group runners up and in the other half of the draw (assuming we win our group of course).
    Not to mention if France lost to Poland, with Netherlands and Austria drawing, they'd go out of the Tournament.
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,778
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Would've been better for us if the goal had been given as then France would likely end up group runners up and in the other half of the draw (assuming we win our group of course).
    At the moment, I’d say our chances of beating either of these teams is slim at best, so I’m not sure this result matters that much!

Categories

“Marketplace”