Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Everton Deducted 10 Points - reduced to 6 on appeal (p3)
Addick Addict
Posts: 39,756
For breaching PSR
0
Comments
-
-
Puts them joint bottom with Burnley0
-
haha0
-
Mentioned in the premier league thread last week, if ever there was a year to get a points deduction this would be it.
Everton will probably still escape relegation, there’s so much dross in the league at the very bottom15 -
Wow. I can't remember any previous Premier League points deductions for financial reasons.1
-
I can't believe for a single second that Man City are clean, yet they get away with it21
-
They'll still scrape over the line0
-
Not sure it’s funny for a fanbase who had nothing to do with it.
I’m not familiar with the specific details but why weren’t Man City deducted points for their breaches of financial rules?2 -
Portsmouth?killerandflash said:Wow. I can't remember any previous Premier League points deductions for financial reasons.2 -
Have City been found guilty yet? That seems to be dragging on forever2
- Sponsored links:
-
City and Chelsea next please7
-
They won't go down. Even with the deduction they're not bottom and will only be 2 points from safety.
0 -
Each time the premier league representative comes to the Etihad they drown him/her in a big vat of oilkillerandflash said:Have City been found guilty yet? That seems to be dragging on forever7 -
How the hell can City and Chelsea get away with it now?! Surely not.9
-
Looking on the City forum - they think they are now royally fucked.1
-
Fairly outrageous to be honest. I don't know if it will make it past an appeal as it's a pretty unprecedented deduction. It also sets a very dangerous precedent for the league; in reality the thing that did for Everton is the fact that they suddenly couldn't inject any capital to offset the losses because Moshiri was being funded by Usmanov and world events meant his money was no good anymore. Everton are now on the verge of a takeover by a new set of dodgy owners who are currently in an ongoing sanction battle about not being able to pay their staff. With the state of the world a fair few Premier League teams might be hoping their famously chilled governments don't do anything bonkers in the next few years that would result in more scrutiny on how they fund things. I think there's a lot of Premier League teams financing themselves in dodgy ways; a massive deduction isn't going to work as a deterrent but it can work to completely destroy clubs while their owners then wander off to pretend to care about something else when it stops being fun.
0 -
*Checks to see if Palace are anywhere near relegation. They aren’t.*This is fine.13
-
I saw that, if it were last season they woukd be guaranteed relegation, this season Dyche had the playing reasonably well.Chris_from_Sidcup said:They won't go down. Even with the deduction they're not bottom and will only be 2 points from safety.0 -
Apparently the case against City will take 2/4 years to complete. That announcement I believe came out in February.0
-
Everton had 1 charge, Man City have over 100 against them. Not surprising it’s taking longer.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Whilst I follow this argument shouldn’t the capital be invested before they spend it?Garrymanilow said:Fairly outrageous to be honest. I don't know if it will make it past an appeal as it's a pretty unprecedented deduction. It also sets a very dangerous precedent for the league; in reality the thing that did for Everton is the fact that they suddenly couldn't inject any capital to offset the losses because Moshiri was being funded by Usmanov and world events meant his money was no good anymore. Everton are now on the verge of a takeover by a new set of dodgy owners who are currently in an ongoing sanction battle about not being able to pay their staff. With the state of the world a fair few Premier League teams might be hoping their famously chilled governments don't do anything bonkers in the next few years that would result in more scrutiny on how they fund things. I think there's a lot of Premier League teams financing themselves in dodgy ways; a massive deduction isn't going to work as a deterrent but it can work to completely destroy clubs while their owners then wander off to pretend to care about something else when it stops being fun.4 -
Just long enough for today’s announcement to be forgotten and a fine issued to City and Chelsea, no doubt.stackitsteve said:Everton had 1 charge, Man City have over 100 against them. Not surprising it’s taking longer.0 -
The case against City is going to be a long and brutal fight to the death, the idea you wrap it up in 3 months is just not possible3
-
Next season, the twenty Premier League clubs will agree to spunk as much moolah as they want, thereby risking each of them getting a ten point deduction, so they can all carry on as normal.5
-
So, like for like comparison should see Man City playing Cray Valley PM in a couple of years time...🤔stackitsteve said:Everton had 1 charge, Man City have over 100 against them. Not surprising it’s taking longer.
5 -
Look forward to Man City being deducted 1500 points.
6 -
The thing about City is, was their behaviour so egregious, that the Premier League strip them of titles as well as points0
-
Don't many clubs exceed their limit?0
-
As others have mentioned City have 115 charges against them. They have denied everything and have the world's best lawyers tying the Premier League up in knots and stringing the case out as long as possible.
Everton had 1 charge against them, that they had breached the profit and sustainability rules. You're allowed to lose a certain amount in a 3 year period (105m) and they were over it. So it doesn't seem like much of a case.
Also Everton were charged in March and it's taken until now, so you can imagine how long City's 115 charges are going to take.3 -
The nightmare scenario is every other club in the league being deducted 40 points, with Palace becoming champions by default!Uboat said:*Checks to see if Palace are anywhere near relegation. They aren’t.*This is fine.9
