Fraser
Taylor Blackett

Ness - Hector - Lloyd
Brewer
I like your jigsaw analogy but I am still hopeful that Holden will find a way to get the best out of Charlie even if it is a plan B.soapboxsam said:I arrived at the valley early and no family or buddy there to get on my soap box so I thought I would study the team warming up.
Charlie Kirk went down after minimal contact from Pearce in the one touch practice. The impression then and during games was that Charlie was lightweight. Came with a reputation for being decent when having a wing back or attacking full back(Pickering)outside him where he could either feed or use as a decoy.
Kirk is like the jigsaw piece that despite trying, you just can't fit in.
Shame but it happens at every club and unfortunately its the player that received the longest contract 🤷🏻♂️
I'm also a fan of him as an attacking player. He's clever in how he uses the ball and he rarely loses possession. He doesn't take on his man, but he doesn't have to gamble like in order to create something, he only needs half a yard to create an opening while other wingers need to beat their man and look up. But it's his token defensive effort that really lets him down. He's just uninterested in that side of the game and at a club like ours, that's never going to go down well.CafcWest said:Against the masses of Kirk haters... I actually think he has something to offer - played in the right position. Last season he was mainly played out wide and it didn't work. On one home game (can't remember which) he was moved more inside and was much more effective. He has a good footballing brain and a good touch and was responsible for quite a few assists before being loaned out. Unless we can sign "better" then I think he still has a role to play. Cue the LOLs.
So we can put you down as "undecided" then Sage?Sage said:Kirk the pretender.
Runs around trying to look busy or calls for the ball but he actually doesn’t want it and is doing nothing. Can’t beat a player, is lightweight, doesn’t have a left foot, isn’t willing to track back and do the dirty work, nor is he good enough for it. He isn’t quick, he’s previously been a bad influence with a poor attitude, and we can’t have a player needing another type of player in the team just to make him potentially look half decent.
He didn’t do very well or feature too much for Burton on loan, is that because he didn’t have an attacking left back playing with him too? Yet they did, having played a 3-4-3 themselves.
Why do players always seem to be better when they’re back and not playing? He’s not good enough, absolutely not for a team hoping to grt promoted, and I am certain Holden knows it. Get rid, hope to somehow get a couple of hundred thousand for him, and let’s all move on.
Spot on - wearing pink boots against Welling and nothing to show for it (yes I know he 'scored' in the friendly).Sage said:Kirk the pretender.
Runs around trying to look busy or calls for the ball but he actually doesn’t want it and is doing nothing. Can’t beat a player, is lightweight, doesn’t have a left foot, isn’t willing to track back and do the dirty work, nor is he good enough for it. He isn’t quick, he’s previously been a bad influence with a poor attitude, and we can’t have a player needing another type of player in the team just to make him potentially look half decent.
He didn’t do very well or feature too much for Burton on loan, is that because he didn’t have an attacking left back playing with him too? Yet they did, having played a 3-4-3 themselves.
Why do players always seem to be better when they’re back and not playing? He’s not good enough, absolutely not for a team hoping to grt promoted, and I am certain Holden knows it. Get rid, hope to somehow get a couple of hundred thousand for him, and let’s all move on.
That team would get very overrun in midfield.Leuth said:Like, here's what I'd say might be our best CURRENT team (with May):
May Leaburn/Kanu
Kirk
CBT Fraser Dobbo Egbo
Ness Hector Lloyd
Isted-Brewer
Exactly this - McGrandles for example seems worth another go, he didn't get a run here due to injury etc and then did well on loan.Manic_mania said:He didn't exactly set the world on fire at Burton during his loan either (8 games came off bench out of 14 apps, 2 goals no assists) Blackpool decided to pass after a loan spell because they didn't end up thinking he was worth what they did prior to him going there. Its not just us where he has struggled.
McGrandles for Kanu, Kirk supporting May, Fraser more advanced?North Lower Neil said:That team would get very overrun in midfield.Leuth said:Like, here's what I'd say might be our best CURRENT team (with May):
May Leaburn/Kanu
Kirk
CBT Fraser Dobbo Egbo
Ness Hector Lloyd
Isted-Brewer
Leuth said:McGrandles for Kanu, Kirk supporting May, Fraser more advanced?North Lower Neil said:That team would get very overrun in midfield.Leuth said:Like, here's what I'd say might be our best CURRENT team (with May):
May Leaburn/Kanu
Kirk
CBT Fraser Dobbo Egbo
Ness Hector Lloyd
Isted-Brewer
I dunno, it's got 13 players in it for a startNorth Lower Neil said:That team would get very overrun in midfield.Leuth said:Like, here's what I'd say might be our best CURRENT team (with May):
May Leaburn/Kanu
Kirk
CBT Fraser Dobbo Egbo
Ness Hector Lloyd
Isted-Brewer
Unless the player is a L1 "cheat code" you can't carry players who need tactics built around them. He's not good enough for thatsam3110 said:He only works wide left with an aggressive wing back to support him. He'll only work well in a 10 with one striker dropping deep and the other making a run behind to offer options, with willing runners from deeper midfield also helping out.
He's the very definition of a luxury player, and used well will be effective. But I don't fancy the thought of us building the way we play all around Charlie Kirk