Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Britain's Second City?
CharltonMadrid
Posts: 5,091
Been following a discussion about this and thought I'd get the opinion of the good folk of Charlton Life. What do you regard as Britain/the UK 's second city and why? Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Edinburgh or any other? Be interested to see the views and what the majority opinion is.
0
Comments
-
Never thought it was even up for discussion. Always been told as a lad by the media it is Birmingham.8
-
Definitely Birmingham for population but there seems to be an argument for others for commercial and cultural impact.0
-
Me too, always been Brumbolloxbolder said:Never thought it was even up for discussion. Always been told as a lad by the media it is Birmingham.0 -
Only Greater London, and Greater Manchester, Brum is only an urban sprawl linked by dual carriage ways and submerged under a motorway interchange0
-
Birmingham if you’re talking population. Edinburgh if you’re talking history, Manchester if you’re talking culture and Glasgow if you’re talking football.Of course across all of those metrics they pale in comparison to London!2
-
Glasgow - second city of empire!
England - for me it is now Manchester, irrespective of population figures (which are now pretty close with Birmingham).3 -
Manchester these days. Very much capital of the North, far enough away from London to have its own importance.
Before independence, Dublin might have been considered the second city of the UK3 -
I would say Manchester as well. Birmingham just doesn't really have much beyond its population.5
-
Always thought is was Brum. Was very surprised to find that it's not official.0
-
Obviously Birmingham is commonly known as the second city. But if you ask me personally, as someone who grew up in the 90s, it’s Manchester.For three reasons, Oasis, Alex Ferguson’s Manchester United and that I believe Manchester would be the second city on the tip of the tongue for the rest of the world.5
-
Sponsored links:
-
No prizes for coming second
4 -
But there is a certain satisfaction in lasting that longvalleynick66 said:No prizes for coming second
10 -
Manchester for me.0
-
Never Liverpool. It’s smaller than Bristol0
-
WelshAddick said:Never Liverpool. It’s smaller than BristolYes it is too small - but very good in parts.Manchester is a truly great city full of so many different faces. It's only 30 minutes from me as well!London is still the king and always will be.2
-
Not even part of England according to scousers.WelshAddick said:Never Liverpool. It’s smaller than Bristol2 -
2nd =1st loser0
-
And no one remembers them. Clearly.valleynick66 said:No prizes for coming second0 -
I know it's meant to be Birmingham, but Manchester is definitely England's second city these days.If it's the UK's second city... Edinburgh might run it close.4
-
Definitely Manchester. I reckon they say Brum given it’s proximity to the greatest city in the world. But Manchester is the second city.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
London, Glasgow, Manchester.0
-
It would have been the second city, but the locals keep nicking bits of it.AllHailTheHen said:
Not even part of England according to scousers.WelshAddick said:Never Liverpool. It’s smaller than Bristol1 -
B’ham was the second city due to the amount of industry in the past, it was the metal bashing centre of the country. Things have changed and Manchester is probably now the second city.1
-
Glasgow has it as a hand me down, as Dublin (thankfully) had grown out of it and no longer needed it.bobmunro said:Glasgow - second city of empire!1 -
Always thought it was Birmingham0
-
Manchester. It has the cultural weight. I bet more of us can name the Mayor of Manchester over the Mayor of the West Midlands. And more players for United or City than Villa or Brum. And more Manc bands than Brum.
I know Birmingham is officially bigger than Manchester but add in Greater Manchester and I'm pretty sure it's on a par with the West Midlands.
Just checking the populations and found this https://citymonitor.ai/environment/where-are-largest-cities-britain-1404
which argues that in terms of urban area - continuous urban development with no countryside in between, Manchester is 2nd to London (2.7M people to London's 11.12 which would include places like Watford and Dartford). It then uses other definitions to put Brum back into 2nd.0 -
Used to be Brum, now Manchester in my eyes.1
-
Manchester is a great place3
-
Edinburgh - classy, beautiful Auld Reekie high on the banks of the Forth Estuary. Birmingham and Manchester are shabby sprawling urban messes. Glasgow too tired around the egdes.0
-
I’d say Manchester0

















