Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)
Comments
-
I'd absolutely love that list Sage. But get a suspicion it's going to be a winger (probably on loan), Striker (for a fee) and a cover fullback on loan. I'd love for your list to be exactly what happens because I think you've got the needs exactly right.1
-
Bid rejected for Davison, presumably (hopefully 🤞) just holding out for a bit more money!ShiftJFC and Davison out, replace them Payne and mckirdy4
-
Not sure we need 4 wingers and 4 strikers to be honest. With 3 starting you’re leaving 5 out every week. I’d go with 3 strikers especially with Leaburn and Kanu coming throughSage said:If Forster-Caskey leaves, will be a shame as think he’s a top player for this level. What we would need to bring in is someone who will score goals from the centre of midfield.
Davison leaves we bring in 2 strikers. Leaburn has been good but let him actually develop at a decent level without ruining him.
If it was up to me, personally think we need:
Another full back
Left sided centre back
Centre midfielder (who scores goals)
Winger (who scores goals)
2x striker
4 of those to be on loan, the others permanent with one involving a fee.1 -
Bid rejected for Davison.sammy391 said:Bid rejected for Davison, presumably (hopefully 🤞) just holding out for a bit more money!ShiftJFC and Davison out, replace them Payne and mckirdy
I can only assume it was £4.50
£5 I'd snap your hand off1 -
Is he being put down?charlton_hero said:
It's for the best.MarcusH26 said:https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-reject-bids-for-striker-josh-davison/
Bids rejected for Davison but open to selling. Probably hinges on another striker in the door first6 -
Old charlton player with a connection to the Danes.
Simon Makienok anyone.I am just thinking out loud.1 -
Try not to thinkLewis Coaches said:Old charlton player with a connection to the Danes.
Simon Makienok anyone.I am just thinking out loud.
32 -
I’m now laughing out loud!!!!😂😜Lewis Coaches said:Old charlton player with a connection to the Danes.
Simon Makienok anyone.I am just thinking out loud.0 -
Just noticed the Davison article mentions us wanting to strengthen central midfield. Payne in JFC out I wonder?
The former Milton Keynes and Brighton player has interest and is facing a battle for regular game time, with the Addicks keen to strengthen even further in that department.
3 -
Surely if we have had bids for Davison ponytail we get rid and get a replacement asap which we need anyway. He will leave on a free next year if he stays so stupid to hold out for a bigger fee which I can not imagine being much? £50,000 tops is his value.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
By your post I think you’re expecting two Charltonised strikers.Sage said:If Forster-Caskey leaves, will be a shame as think he’s a top player for this level. What we would need to bring in is someone who will score goals from the centre of midfield.
Davison leaves we bring in 2 strikers. Leaburn has been good but let him actually develop at a decent level without ruining him.
If it was up to me, personally think we need:
Another full back
Left sided centre back
Centre midfielder (who scores goals)
Winger (who scores goals)
2x striker
4 of those to be on loan, the others permanent with one involving a fee.0 -
We also need another on top of Davison ponytail, so Two to come in!
If we do not do this, looks even more stupid not to offer Washington anything! He would of thrived in a front 3.
Of course he could of pissed off to Rotherham anyway!1 -
Washington played in a front 3 under Adkins and it didn't suit him. He's not suited to playing as one of the wide forwards/wingers or as the lone striker.Cafcmunich said:We also need another on top of Davison ponytail, so Two to come in!
If we do not do this, looks even more stupid not to offer Washington anything! He would of thrived in a front 3.
Of course he could of pissed off to Rotherham anyway!2 -
Judging by today he would be playing deeper any way0
-
By thrive do you mean score lots of goals or just run around a lot, miss chances with the odd goal?Cafcmunich said:We also need another on top of Davison ponytail, so Two to come in!
If we do not do this, looks even more stupid not to offer Washington anything! He would of thrived in a front 3.
Of course he could of pissed off to Rotherham anyway!5 -
This. Washington was decent in a 352 as can pull out wide. Not a player for a 433.Scoham said:
Washington played in a front 3 under Adkins and it didn't suit him. He's not suited to playing as one of the wide forwards/wingers or as the lone striker.Cafcmunich said:We also need another on top of Davison ponytail, so Two to come in!
If we do not do this, looks even more stupid not to offer Washington anything! He would of thrived in a front 3.
Of course he could of pissed off to Rotherham anyway!1 -
I know Aneke gets injured a lot but there aren't going to be many if any teams who sign 4 first team strikers to compete for one spot. If Davison goes I don't think we'll be getting 2 in
3 -
Fancy Payne to us Davison to Swindon.23
-
So, we've given up on Jack and are now after his sister Fancy...SoundAsa£ said:Fancy Payne to us Davison to Swindon. 15 -
No it was Jack and his cousin Danny.
We want Jack & Danny.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Opinions mate. Just can’t help but disagree.cafcfan1990 said:
Not sure we need 4 wingers and 4 strikers to be honest. With 3 starting you’re leaving 5 out every week. I’d go with 3 strikers especially with Leaburn and Kanu coming throughSage said:If Forster-Caskey leaves, will be a shame as think he’s a top player for this level. What we would need to bring in is someone who will score goals from the centre of midfield.
Davison leaves we bring in 2 strikers. Leaburn has been good but let him actually develop at a decent level without ruining him.
If it was up to me, personally think we need:
Another full back
Left sided centre back
Centre midfielder (who scores goals)
Winger (who scores goals)
2x striker
4 of those to be on loan, the others permanent with one involving a fee.
Aneke is unlikely to start too many games, but can also be played as a 10. Stockley is likely to be our 9 an injury to him means we are in trouble. We haven’t replaced Washington and we need another different type of striker to be available.
Out wide you have Blackett-Taylor who is our best winger but all hopes cannot be pinned onto us. DJ hopefully will have a better year but hasn’t really shown to be anything like a top 6 player, and Kirk could still leave and has yet to show really anything. An injury to any of them means we have 2 players to play 2 positions. We need another.2 -
Definitely agree on the wingers. Like you said initially, they need to be capable of scoring goals too.Sage said:
Opinions mate. Just can’t help but disagree.cafcfan1990 said:
Not sure we need 4 wingers and 4 strikers to be honest. With 3 starting you’re leaving 5 out every week. I’d go with 3 strikers especially with Leaburn and Kanu coming throughSage said:If Forster-Caskey leaves, will be a shame as think he’s a top player for this level. What we would need to bring in is someone who will score goals from the centre of midfield.
Davison leaves we bring in 2 strikers. Leaburn has been good but let him actually develop at a decent level without ruining him.
If it was up to me, personally think we need:
Another full back
Left sided centre back
Centre midfielder (who scores goals)
Winger (who scores goals)
2x striker
4 of those to be on loan, the others permanent with one involving a fee.
Aneke is unlikely to start too many games, but can also be played as a 10. Stockley is likely to be our 9 an injury to him means we are in trouble. We haven’t replaced Washington and we need another different type of striker to be available.
Out wide you have Blackett-Taylor who is our best winger but all hopes cannot be pinned onto us. DJ hopefully will have a better year but hasn’t really shown to be anything like a top 6 player, and Kirk could still leave and has yet to show really anything. An injury to any of them means we have 2 players to play 2 positions. We need another.
I get your point about a different type of striker. Problem is that if you're starting Stockley you've got 3 on the bench. In a 433 where does that striker fit in? We do need a very capable understudy to Stockley.
1 -
.0
-
Payne isn’t a Swindon player-he’s a free agentSoundAsa£ said:Fancy Payne to us Davison to Swindon.4 -
Even so I'd still give them Davison 😁Red_Chester said:
Payne isn’t a Swindon player-he’s a free agentSoundAsa£ said:Fancy Payne to us Davison to Swindon.25 -
Clickbait. It’s just a guess from Agbonlahor who in my experience is always wrong.MuttleyCAFC said:3 -
Sadly all speculation from now retired Gabby Agbonlahor of all peopleMuttleyCAFC said:0 -
with Joe's recent history of injuries perhaps signing a 5 year contract is his was of ensuring financial stability for him and his his family, and that might be more important to him than his immediate football playing future.6
-
a name someone mentioned to me today.
WIOTOS8
