Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
General things that Annoy you
Comments
-
Gribbo said:@T_C_E , that's the same green choke cord I had for my Humphrey from when he was about a year old. I keep it in my drawer as a momento of him
I use, 4 foot leather/brass custom made leads expensive at £25/30 but last for years.1 -
-
SuedeAdidas said:0
-
Haha....sorry mate - it was an open goal....1
-
T_C_E said:Gribbo said:@T_C_E , that's the same green choke cord I had for my Humphrey from when he was about a year old. I keep it in my drawer as a momento of him
I use, 4 foot leather/brass custom made leads expensive at £25/30 but last for years.
Handy for taking the dogs going out for evening flight on the foreshore. Keeps the dog from bothering the Twitchers
0 -
holyjo said:thickandthin63 said:I have no objection to decent salaries.I suppose I am a bit old fashioned by thinking people work for charities partly out of a love for the cause.(Salvation army ceo 10k a year ,a prime example)Six figure salaries quite honestly annoy me,they say we need the best talent,but who are they fighting off to employ these people.I also bear in mind that a hell of a lot of charity workers in shops,selling badges etc.work for nothing.I was approached once by a charity to do some door stepping ,i agreed until I saw the CEO was on 160k. a year.Many years ago,I drove a team around pubs collecting money,by the time every one had their bit,(We got 30%) only 10% went to charities,the other 60% went on salaries for organisers who basically sat on their arse and counted the money.So there we go,rant over,I will continue to donate to my chosen charities knowing most of my donations are being used for the cause.
Red Cross 173k turnover 261m
Cancer research 240k turnover 621m
Macmillan 170k turnover 190m
Nspcc 162k turnover 106m
National Trust 179k Turnover 494m.
These figures make a charity turnover of 10 m quite small,my opinion 50-60 k would be about right,given that the staff would all be very dedicated people and would do their work without the need for much interference from the top.
The amount of charities paying more than the PM is enormous,even when donations fell during the pandemic,many of the top earners still got rises.I do stress this is only my personal take on this matter and obviously many will think these salaries are justifed.1 -
T_C_E said:North Lower Neil said:T_C_E said:North Lower Neil said:man_at_milletts said:Bournemouth Addick said:Twonks with out of control dogs on retractable leads. Once again out for a run tonight I end up with a yappy dog 15 feet from its owner trying to bring me down like Luke Skywalker and that Imperial walker. Literally had to anchor up while this annoying furball ran around me.
If your dog is going to run off at a tangent without any warning, maybe use a shorter lead if you're in a place with other people about eh? And it's not fecking funny either.Let me guess what the owner said. 'He only wants to be friendly' or 'He won't hurt you'?
And then owners who can't control their dogs come out with what is effectively "he'll probably only jump up at you barking in your face, he doesn't bite people!"
Yeah, cheers for that.All foc of course, this little lady was hysterical on arrival 50 minutes later.) but I understand how difficult it is, this mum and child is a friend of a Charlton fan who put her in touch, I'm sure he reads here!?
Maybe worth a chat to her?
We have to prepare her for going anywhere in advance, effectively, given the need for routine, the anxiety issues etc, so it has to be something she agrees to to even get her in the car!!1 -
thickandthin63 said:holyjo said:thickandthin63 said:I have no objection to decent salaries.I suppose I am a bit old fashioned by thinking people work for charities partly out of a love for the cause.(Salvation army ceo 10k a year ,a prime example)Six figure salaries quite honestly annoy me,they say we need the best talent,but who are they fighting off to employ these people.I also bear in mind that a hell of a lot of charity workers in shops,selling badges etc.work for nothing.I was approached once by a charity to do some door stepping ,i agreed until I saw the CEO was on 160k. a year.Many years ago,I drove a team around pubs collecting money,by the time every one had their bit,(We got 30%) only 10% went to charities,the other 60% went on salaries for organisers who basically sat on their arse and counted the money.So there we go,rant over,I will continue to donate to my chosen charities knowing most of my donations are being used for the cause.
Red Cross 173k turnover 261m
Cancer research 240k turnover 621m
Macmillan 170k turnover 190m
Nspcc 162k turnover 106m
National Trust 179k Turnover 494m.
These figures make a charity turnover of 10 m quite small,my opinion 50-60 k would be about right,given that the staff would all be very dedicated people and would do their work without the need for much interference from the top.
The amount of charities paying more than the PM is enormous,even when donations fell during the pandemic,many of the top earners still got rises.I do stress this is only my personal take on this matter and obviously many will think these salaries are justifed.
I recognise that the overlap of "business" and "charity" can sit uncomfortably with some, and influence how people contribute.2 -
thickandthin63 said:holyjo said:thickandthin63 said:I have no objection to decent salaries.I suppose I am a bit old fashioned by thinking people work for charities partly out of a love for the cause.(Salvation army ceo 10k a year ,a prime example)Six figure salaries quite honestly annoy me,they say we need the best talent,but who are they fighting off to employ these people.I also bear in mind that a hell of a lot of charity workers in shops,selling badges etc.work for nothing.I was approached once by a charity to do some door stepping ,i agreed until I saw the CEO was on 160k. a year.Many years ago,I drove a team around pubs collecting money,by the time every one had their bit,(We got 30%) only 10% went to charities,the other 60% went on salaries for organisers who basically sat on their arse and counted the money.So there we go,rant over,I will continue to donate to my chosen charities knowing most of my donations are being used for the cause.
Red Cross 173k turnover 261m
Cancer research 240k turnover 621m
Macmillan 170k turnover 190m
Nspcc 162k turnover 106m
National Trust 179k Turnover 494m.
These figures make a charity turnover of 10 m quite small,my opinion 50-60 k would be about right,given that the staff would all be very dedicated people and would do their work without the need for much interference from the top.
The amount of charities paying more than the PM is enormous,even when donations fell during the pandemic,many of the top earners still got rises.I do stress this is only my personal take on this matter and obviously many will think these salaries are justifed.
Especially with the plum that we have in charge now. My nan should be getting paid more than him....and she's been dead since 1978.
2 -
SuedeAdidas said:thickandthin63 said:holyjo said:thickandthin63 said:I have no objection to decent salaries.I suppose I am a bit old fashioned by thinking people work for charities partly out of a love for the cause.(Salvation army ceo 10k a year ,a prime example)Six figure salaries quite honestly annoy me,they say we need the best talent,but who are they fighting off to employ these people.I also bear in mind that a hell of a lot of charity workers in shops,selling badges etc.work for nothing.I was approached once by a charity to do some door stepping ,i agreed until I saw the CEO was on 160k. a year.Many years ago,I drove a team around pubs collecting money,by the time every one had their bit,(We got 30%) only 10% went to charities,the other 60% went on salaries for organisers who basically sat on their arse and counted the money.So there we go,rant over,I will continue to donate to my chosen charities knowing most of my donations are being used for the cause.
Red Cross 173k turnover 261m
Cancer research 240k turnover 621m
Macmillan 170k turnover 190m
Nspcc 162k turnover 106m
National Trust 179k Turnover 494m.
These figures make a charity turnover of 10 m quite small,my opinion 50-60 k would be about right,given that the staff would all be very dedicated people and would do their work without the need for much interference from the top.
The amount of charities paying more than the PM is enormous,even when donations fell during the pandemic,many of the top earners still got rises.I do stress this is only my personal take on this matter and obviously many will think these salaries are justifed.
Especially with the plum that we have in charge now. My nan should be getting paid more than him....and she's been dead since 1978.0 - Sponsored links:
-
North Lower Neil said:T_C_E said:North Lower Neil said:T_C_E said:North Lower Neil said:man_at_milletts said:Bournemouth Addick said:Twonks with out of control dogs on retractable leads. Once again out for a run tonight I end up with a yappy dog 15 feet from its owner trying to bring me down like Luke Skywalker and that Imperial walker. Literally had to anchor up while this annoying furball ran around me.
If your dog is going to run off at a tangent without any warning, maybe use a shorter lead if you're in a place with other people about eh? And it's not fecking funny either.Let me guess what the owner said. 'He only wants to be friendly' or 'He won't hurt you'?
And then owners who can't control their dogs come out with what is effectively "he'll probably only jump up at you barking in your face, he doesn't bite people!"
Yeah, cheers for that.All foc of course, this little lady was hysterical on arrival 50 minutes later.) but I understand how difficult it is, this mum and child is a friend of a Charlton fan who put her in touch, I'm sure he reads here!?
Maybe worth a chat to her?
We have to prepare her for going anywhere in advance, effectively, given the need for routine, the anxiety issues etc, so it has to be something she agrees to to even get her in the car!!1 -
holyjo said:thickandthin63 said:I have no objection to decent salaries.I suppose I am a bit old fashioned by thinking people work for charities partly out of a love for the cause.(Salvation army ceo 10k a year ,a prime example)Six figure salaries quite honestly annoy me,they say we need the best talent,but who are they fighting off to employ these people.I also bear in mind that a hell of a lot of charity workers in shops,selling badges etc.work for nothing.I was approached once by a charity to do some door stepping ,i agreed until I saw the CEO was on 160k. a year.Many years ago,I drove a team around pubs collecting money,by the time every one had their bit,(We got 30%) only 10% went to charities,the other 60% went on salaries for organisers who basically sat on their arse and counted the money.So there we go,rant over,I will continue to donate to my chosen charities knowing most of my donations are being used for the cause.0
-
Ffs 13th October and Christmas tv ad on.2
-
William Shatner’s space trip.Anybody would think he has landed on the space station, done a space walk and repaired the thrust motor whilst outside.
His entire trip/publicity stunt lasted 11 minutes from take off to landing whilst sitting in a comfy seat.2 -
I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.0
-
You don’t need an excuse to not give to charity.0
-
iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.3
-
iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.0
-
rather than reviewing the individual salary of the CEO might be better to view the percentage of donations that is used in cause as opposed to being used for admin4
- Sponsored links:
-
thickandthin63 said:iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.2
-
I sometimes donate cans of food at the supermarket to the Bexley food bank.
I always imagined it was run by a group of local volunteers, but because of this thread I delved a little deeper and found it was part of the Trussell Trust that supports 1200 food banks. The CEO Emma Revie is on about 80K, that's ok with me, I shall continue to donate my tin cans, I can't see the management nicking them.
BTW Always worth checking before you donate to find out what's needed.
https://bexley.foodbank.org.uk/give-help/donate-food/
0 -
Charities need to bring in the best people to make money, their income generation departments specifically tend to have well paid SMT members as a result. They make the charity far more than they cost.1
-
Stig said:thickandthin63 said:iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.0
-
people having a loud sound tone for their text messages.2
-
thickandthin63 said:Stig said:thickandthin63 said:iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.1
-
Having an argument with Alexa over the volume.........
"Alexa............volume up"
"Alexa........... volume up to 10"
"Feckin ell, is hearing going? Alexa volume up"
"Feckin 'ell Alexa what's going on, I cant hear it"
"ah bollox Alexa, my wife turned the volume down on the amp"
1 -
Stig said:thickandthin63 said:Stig said:thickandthin63 said:iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.iainment said:I love the excuses for not giving to charity.If the CEO and SMT can justify their salaries by generating money I can’t understand the problem. I could run a charity for a low wage. But it would go bust because I don’t have the skill or knowledge needed to generate the income needed.0
-
Adele's new album being considered newsworthy by the bbc11
-
My wife shutting the car door nigh takes all the windows out, when you mention it she spends the next three weeks making three or four attempts to close it properly. FFS3
This discussion has been closed.