Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England Cricket Summer 2020
Comments
-
What a captain Morgan is, above all7
-
Exciting end. I gave England no chance with the posted run chase. Brilliant leadership from Morgan.5
-
Nope. That's test cricketmoutuakilla said:Butler's first stumping?0 -
Just knows how to win white ball matches doesn't he. Our bowling attack is absolutely formiddable, could put out 2 lots of 4x2 seamers and give anyone a game.Leuth said:What a captain Morgan is, above all
Genuinely think the second choice England XI would be around 5th in the world.0 -
32nd. More than twice as many as any other England player.moutuakilla said:Butler's first stumping?2 -
2 -
Even forgot the world cup final winning one! Got into my head when it was frequently mentioned during the recent tests that he hadn't got one in test cricketChizz said:
32nd. More than twice as many as any other England player.moutuakilla said:Butler's first stumping?1 -
as Sir Alex didn't say, "cricket - bloody hell"
0 -
Bonkers.BR3red said:0 -
Sam Curran done really well to be left to bowl have overs at the death, the two wickets with 2 balls sealed it, Archer and Woakes were brilliant and Morgan for me best captain in the world in white ball cricket. Roll on Wednesday.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.3
-
It is a bit of a head scratcher. Woakes scored a crucial 26 and then took the wickets of Finch and Labushagne (their two top scorers) plus another potential match winner in Maxwell and had marginally better bowling figures than Archer.cafcfan1990 said:Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.1 -
all makes for a potentially terrific rubber decider (rubber = series)1
-
Yes, very odd.a lit of pundits saying the sameAddick Addict said:
It is a bit of a head scratcher. Woakes scored a crucial 26 and then took the wickets of Finch and Labushagne (their two top scorers) plus another potential match winner in Maxwell and had marginally better bowling figures than Archer.cafcfan1990 said:Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.0 -
It was a bit of an odd one, but no real standout candidates if you factor in T Curran and Rashid’s runs and bowling. I would have been in favour of Morgan getting it for his captaincy, but can’t ever recall that being done before.PrincessFiona said:
Yes, very odd.a lit of pundits saying the sameAddick Addict said:
It is a bit of a head scratcher. Woakes scored a crucial 26 and then took the wickets of Finch and Labushagne (their two top scorers) plus another potential match winner in Maxwell and had marginally better bowling figures than Archer.cafcfan1990 said:Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.0 -
I thought the same. They were taling on TMS about when a captain got it after being out for a duck and not even bowling!Gary Poole said:
It was a bit of an odd one, but no real standout candidates if you factor in T Curran and Rashid’s runs and bowling. I would have been in favour of Morgan getting it for his captaincy, but can’t ever recall that being done before.PrincessFiona said:
Yes, very odd.a lit of pundits saying the sameAddick Addict said:
It is a bit of a head scratcher. Woakes scored a crucial 26 and then took the wickets of Finch and Labushagne (their two top scorers) plus another potential match winner in Maxwell and had marginally better bowling figures than Archer.cafcfan1990 said:Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.1 -
Interesting did not know that. I think Morgan will be remembered for his captaincy for many years to comePrincessFiona said:
I thought the same. They were taling on TMS about when a captain got it after being out for a duck and not even bowling!Gary Poole said:
It was a bit of an odd one, but no real standout candidates if you factor in T Curran and Rashid’s runs and bowling. I would have been in favour of Morgan getting it for his captaincy, but can’t ever recall that being done before.PrincessFiona said:
Yes, very odd.a lit of pundits saying the sameAddick Addict said:
It is a bit of a head scratcher. Woakes scored a crucial 26 and then took the wickets of Finch and Labushagne (their two top scorers) plus another potential match winner in Maxwell and had marginally better bowling figures than Archer.cafcfan1990 said:Not the end of the world, but how did Archer get MOTM over Woakes? No chance.1 -
When you're out of nick you're out of nick!
0-1
Jason Roy gone first ball of the match0 -
0-2
Root goes 2nd ball of the match
Starc 2-00 -
Make that 0 -2.....0
- Sponsored links:
-
Off to a flier1
-
The biggest shock was that Root didn't review. It was plumb but even so!
Perhaps Bairstow told him that he wanted the two reviews for himself1 -
his was a crazy selection .. he had had virtually no cricket this year .. let's see if Root can actually take root for a few oversAddick Addict said:When you're out of nick you're out of nick!
0-1
Jason Roy gone first ball of the match4 -
Wherefore art thou, Zak.....4
-
I've got my pads on at this rate lol1
-
Fun fact Fanny - wherefore means why. (Well, it's not a very fun fact, but nor is this start to a game)Fanny Fanackapan said:Wherefore art thou, Zak.....0 -
So, Will got that wrong ?PaddyP17 said:
Fun fact Fanny - wherefore means why. (Well, it's not a very fun fact, but nor is this start to a game)Fanny Fanackapan said:Wherefore art thou, Zak.....
"Why are you , Romeo "
Just as well he didn't post on here.....4 -
Trouble is that Bairstow has had 5 single digit scores from 8 innings so is just as likely to go early and Root hasn't exactly been in prime form this summer eitherLincsaddick said:
his was a crazy selection .. he had had virtually no cricket this year .. let's see if Root can actually take root for a few oversAddick Addict said:When you're out of nick you're out of nick!
0-1
Jason Roy gone first ball of the match0 -
Well, he got it right. Juliet opens that monologue lamenting that he is a Montague and not of some other family, because they're in love, but as their families are feuding, any relationship is unacceptable. Hence star-crossed lovers and all that.Fanny Fanackapan said:
So, Will got that wrong ?PaddyP17 said:
Fun fact Fanny - wherefore means why. (Well, it's not a very fun fact, but nor is this start to a game)Fanny Fanackapan said:Wherefore art thou, Zak.....
"Why are you , Romeo "
Just as well he didn't post on here.....1 -
I just MUST keep up .. I am even more convinced that Root is not a proper one day batsman .. he is too 'cultured' for the 1 day gameLincsaddick said:
his was a crazy selection .. he had had virtually no cricket this year .. let's see if Root can actually take root for a few oversAddick Addict said:When you're out of nick you're out of nick!
0-1
Jason Roy gone first ball of the match0
