Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Club For A Quid protest (Aug 2020)
Comments
-
Is it possible he's speaking to various key protestors without your knowledge? That certainly seems to be the case.SE7toSG3 said:Just for absolute clarity for all those that attended yesterday and also those who didn't but are interested.
MATT SOUTHALL HAD NO/ZERO/NADA CONTACT WITH ANY OF THE ORGANISERS OF THE PROTEST OUTSIDE THE WEST STAND BETWEEN 1200 & 1300.
NONE OF US HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM, WOULD HAVE LISTENED TO HIM OR TAKEN ADVICE FROM HIM.
MATT SOUTHALL IS AS CULPABLE FOR THIS MESS AS MUCH AS ANYONE CONNECTED TO ESI.
I remain hopeful that the truth will out and we can see what leeches they all have been during their disastrous tenure in SE7, they have no place at our club or football in general.
Thanks to the 500 plus of you who came along and protested lawfully with passion and dignity, your support is appreciated by myself and my fellow addicks from CAST and Fans4fans.0 -
maybe but I still stand by the above, Southall was in no way connected to the protest outside the West Stand and no lines should be blurred on that.
I and I know the others that spoke alongside me yesterday, so fervently against all of ESI do not wish to be associated with him.
4 -
Why do you say that? Because of what smiffyboy said? Believe me @SE7toSG3 is as close to this as anyone and if he says there was no contact with Southall then that is more than good enough for me.KentishAddick said:
Is it possible he's speaking to various key protestors without your knowledge? That certainly seems to be the case.SE7toSG3 said:Just for absolute clarity for all those that attended yesterday and also those who didn't but are interested.
MATT SOUTHALL HAD NO/ZERO/NADA CONTACT WITH ANY OF THE ORGANISERS OF THE PROTEST OUTSIDE THE WEST STAND BETWEEN 1200 & 1300.
NONE OF US HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM, WOULD HAVE LISTENED TO HIM OR TAKEN ADVICE FROM HIM.
MATT SOUTHALL IS AS CULPABLE FOR THIS MESS AS MUCH AS ANYONE CONNECTED TO ESI.
I remain hopeful that the truth will out and we can see what leeches they all have been during their disastrous tenure in SE7, they have no place at our club or football in general.
Thanks to the 500 plus of you who came along and protested lawfully with passion and dignity, your support is appreciated by myself and my fellow addicks from CAST and Fans4fans.3 -
Think what you want believe what you want0
-
I'm glad to hear that and thank you for clarifying it.SE7toSG3 said:maybe but I still stand by the above, Southall was in no way connected to the protest outside the West Stand and no lines should be blurred on that.
I and I know the others that spoke alongside me yesterday, so fervently against all of ESI do not wish to be associated with him.
I was uncomfortable with him being involved a while back when he visited Farnells offices with NLA, and found it hard to believe that NLAs company was used by him to try and reclaim the range rovers, despite the fact MS still has 2 of them.
I am in total disbelief to learn he was involved in some capacity with the protesters in the boardroom yesterday. MS is one of the biggest charlatans we have ever come across and he has caused immeasurable harm to our club, from which we may never recover. We shouldn't be getting permission from him to do anything. He shouldn't be kept informed of our actions. He is scum and should be treated as such.17 -
Smiffyboy is close with Dodger and NLA and has been spot on with his info regarding their actions in the past. If he says they got permission from MS to consume the alcohol then I'm inclined to believe him.LargeAddick said:
Why do you say that? Because of what smiffyboy said? Believe me @SE7toSG3 is as close to this as anyone and if he says there was no contact with Southall then that is more than good enough for me.KentishAddick said:
Is it possible he's speaking to various key protestors without your knowledge? That certainly seems to be the case.SE7toSG3 said:Just for absolute clarity for all those that attended yesterday and also those who didn't but are interested.
MATT SOUTHALL HAD NO/ZERO/NADA CONTACT WITH ANY OF THE ORGANISERS OF THE PROTEST OUTSIDE THE WEST STAND BETWEEN 1200 & 1300.
NONE OF US HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM, WOULD HAVE LISTENED TO HIM OR TAKEN ADVICE FROM HIM.
MATT SOUTHALL IS AS CULPABLE FOR THIS MESS AS MUCH AS ANYONE CONNECTED TO ESI.
I remain hopeful that the truth will out and we can see what leeches they all have been during their disastrous tenure in SE7, they have no place at our club or football in general.
Thanks to the 500 plus of you who came along and protested lawfully with passion and dignity, your support is appreciated by myself and my fellow addicks from CAST and Fans4fans.0 -
There’s the PlayStation being put under the front gate
0 -
I've been told by two separate people involved with the boardroom (one yesterday, one today) that they understood Southall had given permission for them to help themselves to drinks so it's certainly something that was being said.
Obviously Southall isn't in a position to be giving that permission.21 -
Sorry to piss on the fire I don’t tell liesLouisMend said:I've been told by two separate people involved with the boardroom (one yesterday, one today) that they understood Southall had given permission for them to help themselves to drinks so it's certainly something that was being said.
Obviously Southall isn't in a position to be giving that permission.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
I cant speak on behalf of those in the boardroom thats fair enough and NLA has stated on a number of occasions that he has spoken with Southall, myself, Brett from Fans4fans and Sam from the trust have not.
I know that Southall was not involved in the Hale visit by Charlton fans the other Friday and at no stage was involved in the planning for Saturdays event. I was in on all the meetings briefings in the lead up and he was not involved.
I have been told by NLA that an inventory of what was drunk inside the boardroom was taken and monies left behind before they exited.
I was not in there so can't be sure but have no reason to disbelieve him.
4 -
Why is anybody asking Southall permission for anything?8
-
Not having a go at you mate, you and the other organisers did a fantastic job yesterday. Just in disbelief that MS has any involvement in our protests when they're aimed at getting him and his business partners out of the club!SE7toSG3 said:I cant speak on behalf of those in the boardroom thats fair enough and NLA has stated on a number of occasions that he has spoken with Southall, myself, Brett from Fans4fans and Sam from the trust have not.
I know that Southall was not involved in the Hale visit by Charlton fans the other Friday and at no stage was involved in the planning for Saturdays event. I was in on all the meetings briefings in the lead up and he was not involved.
I have been told by NLA that an inventory of what was drunk inside the boardroom was taken and monies left behind before they exited.
I was not in there so can't be sure but have no reason to disbelieve him.1 -
I dont believe he was ever asked for anything Jim, certainly not his permission,JamesSeed said:Why is anybody asking Southall permission for anything?
I have no doubt that in his warped self justifying mind he may have offered it up as the evnt unfolded but I don't believe anyone asks him for it, why would we, we thinknhe is a crook1 -
Am I the only one wondering if the wine was any good?6
-
Not if it’s like the food. Have to pay me to eat/drink it.IdleHans said:Am I the only one wondering if the wine was any good?0 -
In all seriousness, I don’t doubt that Southall gave the nod to help themselves to drink. But if that dodgy c*** told me the sun rises in the east then I’d still get up and check. The thumbs up from him also signals where people were getting their ‘info’ from.3
-
I am told MS definitely ok’d the consumption
“ i did, paid my £1 which probably more than covered the price of it cos it was shite lol... we have told the club we are more than prepared to pay for any of the booze even tho we have a txt message from the owner to help ourselves 🤷🏻♂️“When I asked who the “owner” was I was told “MS”
god knows we’d ask that buffoon anything. He seems to like property that doesn’t belong to him doesn’t he5 -
Good to hear. I noticed in the interviews given to Sky Nimer’s name cropped up in relation to ESI but Southall’s didn’t (I think?)SE7toSG3 said:
I dont believe he was ever asked for anything Jim, certainly not his permission,JamesSeed said:Why is anybody asking Southall permission for anything?
I have no doubt that in his in his warped self justifying mind he may have offered it up as the evnt unfolded but I don't believe anyone asks him for it, why would we, we thinknhe is a crookI’m find it it all really confusing. I hate to think of any of these individuals benefitting from their involvement in our club.But tbh, the main thing is getting these idiots out, and Sandgaard (or someone equally sensible) in.The tension is ridiculous.2 -
In all my interviews and talks to those outside the West Stand Southall was singled out for criticism along with the other crooks that make up ESI.
I think he is a crook,
The others that spoke alongside me think he is a crook
Repeat to fade.....12 -
Sponsored links:
-
Are they also dusting down the guys cock who pissed in the sink?_MrDick said:
The Feds are all over this. Dusting it for prints as we speak. Someone’s going down for this 😲smiffyboy said:There’s the PlayStation being put under the front gate
PWR
Is it true someone urinated in the sink? If so what a complete dickhead and another indication of the moronic behaviour of some people! Perhaps he also should be identified and banned!1 -
Yea, though I ride into the Valley of Death, I will fear no evilAirman Brown said:stonemuse said:
Hadn’t realised quite how camera shy ... do a google search for images and there are scarcely any ... quite strange for the ‘COO’ of a public facing company.Alwaysneil said:Where did you get that photo of our Tone he’s notoriously camera shy.
For I am the biggest coot in the Valley
Disclaimer: "Coot" may be a typo
1 -
👍 Didn’t hear yours unfortunately, but that’s good to hear.SE7toSG3 said:In all my interviews and talks to those outside the West Stand Southall was singled out for criticism along with the other crooks that make up ESI.
I think he is a crook,
The others that spoke alongside me think he is a crook
Repeat to fade.....I think what makes it worse is the way Southall conned so many people. Double whammy.2 -
Having praised him he’s still blocked me on twitter for some unknown reason. LolBedsaddick said:That's the first time i've seen Dodger being interviewed. Got to say i'm impressed . Especially what he said about the EFL.0 -
"Lads I used to to work for sainsburys, go an help your self tomorrow, tell them I said it was OK. If they kick off offer to pay for what you say you took."
On the face of it, it sounds bloody stupid doesn't it.
How does it look legally?
The defence is: A person we believe to own 35% of the business and be a director of the holding company gave us permission to consume what ever we wanted, we aren't free loaders or in his pocket, so we offered to pay.
The "victim": but he doesn't own 35%.....
The law: Prove it....
Text book.
1 -
You poor old thing.Bedsaddick said:
Having praised him he’s still blocked me on twitter for some unknown reason. LolBedsaddick said:That's the first time i've seen Dodger being interviewed. Got to say i'm impressed . Especially what he said about the EFL.0 -
🦘JamesSeed said:
You poor old thing.Bedsaddick said:
Having praised him he’s still blocked me on twitter for some unknown reason. LolBedsaddick said:That's the first time i've seen Dodger being interviewed. Got to say i'm impressed . Especially what he said about the EFL.5 -
Who did Southall text?0
-
Totally agree its not something anyone should be comfortable with, hes worse than any of them blatantly lied to Lee Bowyer and the fans on numerous occasions.KentishAddick said:Mouthall is far too close and involved with certain people in our fanbase. Not comfortable with it at all.1 -
Not strictly true as Darren actually went to his house and was invited in to speak to him or is that not true?SE7toSG3 said:Just for absolute clarity for all those that attended yesterday and also those who didn't but are interested.
MATT SOUTHALL HAD NO/ZERO/NADA CONTACT WITH ANY OF THE ORGANISERS OF THE PROTEST OUTSIDE THE WEST STAND BETWEEN 1200 & 1300.
NONE OF US HAVE SPOKEN TO HIM, WOULD HAVE LISTENED TO HIM OR TAKEN ADVICE FROM HIM.
MATT SOUTHALL IS AS CULPABLE FOR THIS MESS AS MUCH AS ANYONE CONNECTED TO ESI.
I remain hopeful that the truth will out and we can see what leeches they all have been during their disastrous tenure in SE7, they have no place at our club or football in general.
Thanks to the 500 plus of you who came along and protested lawfully with passion and dignity, your support is appreciated by myself and my fellow addicks from CAST and Fans4fans.1
