Charlton / L1 - January 2019 Transfer Rumours (ed, deadline day starts p98)
Comments
-
14 goals this season.Charltonstu said:Don't rate Grant
Quick and big but not prolific in front of goal
Let's hope his replacement is up to it.10 -
Well he's not particular big and he's been prolific so far this season.Charltonstu said:Don't rate Grant
Quick and big but not prolific in front of goal6 -
Has a good goal scoring record so far this year but you have to wonder how much he relies on his strike partner Pu Edam to create the chances for him.blackpool72 said:
How good is no body I've never heard of him_MrDick said:What’s the betting that we sell Grant and get no body
0 -
Again, from 'Down at the Mac' 15 minutes ago.
"Deal done. Don't know why embargo on announcement".
0 -
Are you talking to yourself in the mirroir Stu?.......... scrap that, your namesake hasn't got an underscoreCharlton_Stu said:
Well he's not particular big and he's been prolific so far this season.Charltonstu said:Don't rate Grant
Quick and big but not prolific in front of goal
1 -
He only scores headers.blackpool72 said:
How good is no body I've never heard of him_MrDick said:What’s the betting that we sell Grant and get no body
8 -
Charlton waiting for a piece of good news to put out first - the proverbial sh*t sandwich. Unfortunately they could be waiting a while, there hasn’t been any good news coming out of SE7 for a long time!Addickted said:Again, from 'Down at the Mac' 15 minutes ago.
"Deal done. Don't know why embargo on announcement".6 -
Well, Cawley generally gets his info from Bowyer so draw your own conclusions if he’s wrong.Redhenry said:I was told one out and a loan replacement in, sounds like Cawley has been fed some duff info
3 -
And agents1
-
Stop arguing with yourself : - )Charlton_Stu said:
Well he's not particular big and he's been prolific so far this season.Charltonstu said:Don't rate Grant
Quick and big but not prolific in front of goal5 - Sponsored links:
-
Scored a few nice goals last season but has been less than impressive lately. Don’t think him and Taylor would work well together in the same side.Redhenry said:
I don't rate him, every other post I've read on here says we should sign him.DOUCHER said:
What do u mean rh? Don’t U rate him or is he already earmarked?Redhenry said:
I wonder why. What is it with Tom Eaves, how many times have you all watched him?MuttleyCAFC said:Nobody seems to be coming in from Eaves, despite him being out of contract next season. Would a cheeky bid of circa £300k get him possibly?
I’d be interested in signing him but only to sit on the bench.1 -
I do agree - we do need to replace him and if we don't that is a massive problem. My point is that in theory, I think we could replace him with better, unlike Taylor, but that is dependent on Bowyer getting a tiny bit of backing from the owner which is the big if. I am not jumping up and down because he is going, but will be if he is not properly replaced.killerandflash said:
I would agree that Grant is replaceable. But...MuttleyCAFC said:Apologies, but some of us are entitled to think that Grant is not all that great a loss providing he is replaced decently. People might disagree, but it is a valid viewpoint.
a) what is the budget
b) who can we get with 3/4 days of the window open
c) can the replacement form the same partnership with Taylor
The one thing that gives me a small amount of optimism is that Gallen seems very clued up. It's highly likely he's been monitoring possible targets, from loans and freebies to those involving a fee, and what type of attacker they are. The quality of our recent signings suggests he knows what he's doing, which is a novelty for us in recent years.
1 -
I still think this is a really weird signing for Huddersfield. Grant is the only winner here.9
-
Financially yes.Laddick01 said:I still think this is a really weird signing for Huddersfield. Grant is the only winner here.
Football wise no4 -
Fair points. The fact he’s gone shows which one of those he cares about.blackpool72 said:
Financially yes.Laddick01 said:I still think this is a really weird signing for Huddersfield. Grant is the only winner here.
Football wise no
4 -
ExactlyLaddick01 said:
Fair points. The fact he’s gone shows which one of those he cares about.blackpool72 said:
Financially yes.Laddick01 said:I still think this is a really weird signing for Huddersfield. Grant is the only winner here.
Football wise no0 -
@MuttleyCAFC the overwhelming likelihood is that the replacement (if any) will be a loanee and probably a cheap fix as that's all RD will allow. This isn't the first or even the fifth or sixth time Roland has pulled this exact same stunt. THAT'S why people are angry, not because it's Grant specifically but because yet again it's "same shit, different season."6
-
Even if/when Huddersfield are relegated, it's a massive leap to assume Karlan will be good enough to be a top 6 Championship striker, which is where Huddersfield would expect to beLaddick01 said:I still think this is a really weird signing for Huddersfield. Grant is the only winner here.
3 - Sponsored links:
-
Lots of waffle on here but anyone got any rumours on who the new striker will be?1
-
Bowyer said he’s interested in Mo EisaBolderhumphreyreid said:Lots of waffle on here but anyone got any rumours on who the new striker will be?
0 -
Ouch. So Bowyer was told he could have two in and RD has changed his mind now the cheque’s cleared for Grant?Airman Brown said:
Well, Cawley generally gets his info from Bowyer so draw your own conclusions if he’s wrong.Redhenry said:I was told one out and a loan replacement in, sounds like Cawley has been fed some duff info
1 -
I think we'll have to wait and see what happens, I imagine Bowyer wouldn't tell Cawley the whole truth anyway!1
-
No one knows sweet fa let’s just wait and see.1
-
Charlie Austin up for grabs,3
-
Wright Phillips back is a possibility1
-
Cawley saying that a perm is in doubt now too.Redhenry said:I was told one out and a loan replacement in, sounds like Cawley has been fed some duff info
Whoever it is on loan will need to be smart enough and quick enough to feed off Taylor.
Grant puts himself in the right places to score and to miss.
It’s what good strikers do.
1:2 ratio is decent at any level. If he goes we are definitely gonna miss him.
Let’s hope Bowyer can work some magic on him and miraculously convince him to stay.
Better the devil ya know
1 -
Redrobo said:
Charlie's Austin Metro up for grabs,
0 -
Hang on, you said a couple of weeks back there wouldn't be any major departures this window. As usual you seemed very confident.DOUCHER said:Not caught up in thread but can confirm grant is going - it’s done - 2 new signings being worked on - should know more tomorrow pm
8
