Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: Sunderland 2-1 Charlton Athletic

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,650
in General Charlton
Many thanks to the 75 Lifers who gave marks and also thank you for not criticising each other and for keeping to my list of names. I have given Karlen an assist as his play led to the penalty.
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,011
    Unusual for our top players to be attackers, and our bottom players to be defenders/keeper
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,386
    killerandflash said:

    Unusual for our top players to be attackers, and our bottom players to be defenders/keeper

    reflects the result .. defeat
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,650
    also the lowest 5 marks followed the shirt numbers from 1-7
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,889
    Good to see Solly rated so high... Surprised he got higher marks than Marshall though
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,011
    Lincsaddick said:

    killerandflash said:

    Unusual for our top players to be attackers, and our bottom players to be defenders/keeper

    reflects the result .. defeat
    But unless we lose 4-3, the attacking players would normally be just as culpable as the defenders surely? Or praiseworthy
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,386
    killerandflash said:

    Lincsaddick said:

    killerandflash said:

    Unusual for our top players to be attackers, and our bottom players to be defenders/keeper

    reflects the result .. defeat
    But unless we lose 4-3, the attacking players would normally be just as culpable as the defenders surely? Or praiseworthy
    could be but in this case, the defenders and (I better whisper this) the keeper were largely to blame for the defeat
  • thai malaysia addick
    thai malaysia addick Posts: 18,400
    Lincsaddick said:

    killerandflash said:

    Lincsaddick said:

    killerandflash said:

    Unusual for our top players to be attackers, and our bottom players to be defenders/keeper

    reflects the result .. defeat
    But unless we lose 4-3, the attacking players would normally be just as culpable as the defenders surely? Or praiseworthy
    could be but in this case, the defenders and (I better whisper this) the keeper were largely to blame for the defeat
    Depends whether they are the Official Scapegoat or not.
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,052
    Watched the game on Sky and did not realise at the time how little possession we had, especially after a good first half
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,962

    Only 37% possession.

    It would have been 63% possession if Karl Robinson was still manager.
    Would have still lost.

  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,481
    Oggy Red said:


    Only 37% possession.

    It would have been 63% possession if Karl Robinson was still manager.
    Would have still lost.

    I don't necessarily think the result would be different under Robinson, but that lack of possession, especially in the second half, both wares you out and makes it harder to control a game.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,475
    SDAddick said:

    Oggy Red said:


    Only 37% possession.

    It would have been 63% possession if Karl Robinson was still manager.
    Would have still lost.

    I don't necessarily think the result would be different under Robinson, but that lack of possession, especially in the second half, both wares you out and makes it harder to control a game.
    His style also made it hard for us to get in behind teams, like we did for the penalty.

Categories

“Marketplace”