Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Royal Baby

1…1718202223…29

Comments

  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,601
    ValleyGary said:

    Regular updates please Paulie

    Maybe a new thread for every contraction
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    DaveMehmet said:

    ValleyGary said:

    Regular updates please Paulie

    Maybe a new thread for every contraction
    Joey Barton is the midwife.
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,922
    Karim_myBagheri said:

    the Daily Express have live footage from the hospital (not sure how graphic so possibly NSFW):

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/949849/Kate-Middleton-royal-baby-labour-live-update-hospital-Duchess-of-Cambridge-birth-latest


    I think its safe to say you wont be seeing a royal clunge ripped to shreds (unlees shes done PPV like jordan)... so theres no need for the NSFW bit
  • RedMist
    RedMist Posts: 1,404
    Wasn't it 9 months ago the last one was born?
    William must have been on her the moment she got home from hospital, the dirty goat!
  • RedMist
    RedMist Posts: 1,404
    Just checked, I imagined it.
  • palarsehater
    palarsehater Posts: 12,298
    i always would of had Kate down as a conservative turns out shes in labour.
  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    Does anybody under the age of 80 really give a toss about this?
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    eaststandmike said:

    Does anybody under the age of 80 really give a toss about this?

    Prince William might :wink:
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    It's a boy!
  • Riviera
    Riviera Posts: 8,167
    eaststandmike said:

    Does anybody under the age of 80 really give a toss about this?

    Yes.
  • Sponsored links:



  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    I do love a bit of royalty happy news
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,652
    King Arthur it is then!
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,365
    Switched to SSN to get away from the baby talk and even they are reporting it ffs
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 22,955
    Shame they called his brother George, being a prince born on St George's Day would be cool.

    Even if you aren't a prince it would be good. I'd love my birthday to be called St Neil's Day.
  • Howells
    Howells Posts: 253
    Laddick01 said:

    Switched to SSN to get away from the baby talk and even they are reporting it ffs

    Wonderful.
  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,410
    Jack jumped out of the box.
    The bears came home and caught Goldilocks.

    33-1 with Lads this morning.
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,625
    edited April 2018
    I don’t hate the Royals but I sure do hate everything they stand for.

    Congratulations to the family.
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    What is it that they stand for you hate so much
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    Hope all are doing fine.

    Jezza x
  • palarsehater
    palarsehater Posts: 12,298
    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    I've taken the first train to Windsor to celebrate (luckily they've got racing on today). :smile:
  • TalBHAndreBA
    TalBHAndreBA Posts: 380
    edited April 2018
    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody Queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    TalBHAndreBA said:

    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
    Read it all the time...

    Jezza
  • hawksmoor
    hawksmoor Posts: 2,608
    Not trying to be different or controversial, but I honestly couldn't care less.
  • SE7toSG3
    SE7toSG3 Posts: 3,140
    edited April 2018
    That seems a balanced objective website, must be true!
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,345
    TalBHAndreBA said:

    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody Queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
    This. I am not overly keen on the royals. I think they should earn their keep.

    I do respect the William and Harry generation for having served and wanting to carry on. I was disappointed in the way that Harry wasn't allowed to stay in the army.
  • palarsehater
    palarsehater Posts: 12,298
    TalBHAndreBA said:

    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody Queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
    its not really a nonesene is it take the queen out of buckingham palace and whats the usp this is where the royal family used to live?. yanks love the queen and getting photos and buying all the tat from the souvenir shops.
  • TalBHAndreBA
    TalBHAndreBA Posts: 380
    palarsehater said:

    TalBHAndreBA said:

    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody Queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
    its not really a nonesene is it take the queen out of buckingham palace and whats the usp this is where the royal family used to live?. yanks love the queen and getting photos and buying all the tat from the souvenir shops.
    Palace of Versailles?? No French Royal family for centuries, but still a massively popular tourist destination in France. Winter Palace in St. Petersburg also.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,319
    Love the royals, hate the palarses
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,038
    palarsehater said:

    TalBHAndreBA said:

    palarsehater said:

    they do generate about 500 million a year in tourism ( the royal family ) congrats to them i think that will be it now for kids.

    This is a nonsense. The Royal Family doesn't generate any tourism money. Tourists don't meet the bloody Queen. Its the Royal buildings that attract the tourists, and generate money. You can keep the buildings, and dispense of the vastly expensive Royal Family. Versailles is evidence of this.

    https://www.republic.org.uk/what-we-want/monarchy-myth-buster
    its not really a nonesene is it take the queen out of buckingham palace and whats the usp this is where the royal family used to live?. yanks love the queen and getting photos and buying all the tat from the souvenir shops.
    "Versailles is evidence of this." - he's already given you the answer

Categories

“Marketplace”