Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Feminism is the new masculinity...

Big_Bad_World
Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
edited March 2018 in Not Sports Related
...if you follow the same ideological thought process as the trans-activists that have ensured a feminist rally at Millwall Football Club has been cancelled due to concerns of violence from trans-activists against feminists.

Apparently a lot of feminists are kicking back against proposed legislation that will make it legal for a man to self identify as a woman.

I know this will see some people lose complete control of their rectal faculties but is it a dangerous slope to be sliding down or do people believe that it's genuinely okay to self identify, expect everyone else to tow the very vague and contentious issue surrounding it all and to then expect to be treated as a female and even compete in the same sporting arena (which had recently happened in the States where a trans man has competed, and won, a wrestling title in the female category)?
«134

Comments

  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,350
    BBW, one of our resident blowhards will be along in a minute to assist you.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Ding ding! Round One. BBW has opened up with the 'controversial stance but really it's common sense' gambit. Leuth has swung back with an article:

    https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/04/16/what-is-a-terf-and-why-should-you-be-worried/
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    edited March 2018
    Leuth said:

    Ding ding! Round One. BBW has opened up with the 'controversial stance but really it's common sense' gambit. Leuth has swung back with an article:

    https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/04/16/what-is-a-terf-and-why-should-you-be-worried/

    Ding ding. Second half of round one, where reality comes to the fore to show that BBW hasn't actually opened with 'a stance' and Leuth does what everyone comes to expect of him and attempts, and fails dramatically, to claim the moral high ground.

    That there is the first rectal prolapse of the thread, and with a familiar face claiming top spot.

    Fancy just throwing an 'ism' or 'ist' argument in instead of actually debating the point. Proper shit form, but expected.
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    Sensible people: "Let's debate this"

    Leuth: "You're transphobic for wanting to do so"

    Sensible people: "Okay, you keep your offence meter on full tilt whilst normal people talk about the subject and the merits of the content without throwing in an article from an echo chamber-esque website"
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    This could get tasty.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    You're even more disingenuous than I thought if you're claiming not to be expressing a stance in that opening post.

    I was responding with a perspective. Adding to the debate, if you will! Nobody's crapped their pants yet, although 'proper shit form' in response to a valid thread contribution is worrying
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    Talal said:

    This could get tasty.

    Leave the vegan/vegetarian debate out of this. It's complicated enough.
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,206
    If the trans is more comfortable then let it be. I can not see why it should bother anybody else.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    I mean you literally titled the thread 'feminism is the new masculinity' in order to expose the daft! couldn't make it up! wtf! logic of these confused shemales who are just men in dresses really and should have grown out of dolls by now
  • Sponsored links:



  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Oh look, I've bitten! BBW wins again!
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    Solidgone said:

    If the trans is more comfortable then let it be. I can not see why it should bother anybody else.

    Would you support anyone self identifying as a woman to be able to compete against women?

    Genuine question.
  • Solidgone
    Solidgone Posts: 10,206
    That’s a different motivation.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314

    Leuth said:

    Oh look, I've bitten! BBW wins again!

    FFS - Charlton can’t even beat Millwall in an online debate.
    image
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    edited March 2018
    Leuth said:

    I mean you literally titled the thread 'feminism is the new masculinity' in order to expose the daft! couldn't make it up! wtf! logic of these confused shemales who are just men in dresses really and should have grown out of dolls by now

    You're a proper strange fella, no mistake.

    'In order to' - thought police at it's best. What's worse is that this has given you a platform to air all of those dirty thoughts you harbour about what you believe others think.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,219
    World's most pointless and tedious forum thread.

    Two trolls trying to out troll each other and one is a fecking Millwall troll.

    Bye
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Coming from the guy who's been trolling Charlton into letting him store his own antiques collection on the premises ;)
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859

    World's most pointless and tedious forum thread.

    Two trolls trying to out troll each other and one is a fecking Millwall troll.

    Bye

    I'm sorry you feel that way, @Henry Irving , but I can assure you that I am not trolling and that these events, and the cancellation, happened.

    I appreciate that it's a very difficult subject for some to debate and that for others they only have the option of either shutting the debate down or throwing accusations and/or insults at people (not yourself).
  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859

    World's most pointless and tedious forum thread.

    Two trolls trying to out troll each other and one is a fecking Millwall troll.

    Bye

    As for most tedious thread, I think the Millwall Relegation Watch has got to be up there along with the Brexit one.
  • Sponsored links:



  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,594

    ...if you follow the same ideological thought process as the trans-activists that have ensured a feminist rally at Millwall Football Club has been cancelled due to concerns of violence from trans-activists against feminists.

    Apparently a lot of feminists are kicking back against proposed legislation that will make it legal for a man to self identify as a woman.

    I know this will see some people lose complete control of their rectal faculties but is it a dangerous slope to be sliding down or do people believe that it's genuinely okay to self identify, expect everyone else to tow the very vague and contentious issue surrounding it all and to then expect to be treated as a female and even compete in the same sporting arena (which had recently happened in the States where a trans man has competed, and won, a wrestling title in the female category)?

    At this rate no one’s ever going to do the ironing.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    Not a subject that I’ve given much thought to if I’m honest. But that won’t stop me commenting of course.

    Generally, with the exception of intersex conditions, there are two genders that most people can agree on - male and female. A man wearing a dress doesn’t make them a woman in the biological sense - even with surgery. Not aware that uterus and ovarian transplants accompany surgical realignment. So perhaps I can understand women (feminist or not) taking exception to being told what to do as women by someone who was a man last week!

    That’s biological - but there is the socio/environmenta/psychological constructs also in play. A man may wish to live their life and consider themselves female if they so wish but they are still biologically male. And vice versa of course. I have no problem with that at all.

  • Big_Bad_World
    Big_Bad_World Posts: 5,859
    bobmunro said:

    Not a subject that I’ve given much thought to if I’m honest. But that won’t stop me commenting of course.

    Generally, with the exception of intersex conditions, there are two genders that most people can agree on - male and female. A man wearing a dress doesn’t make them a woman in the biological sense - even with surgery. Not aware that uterus and ovarian transplants accompany surgical realignment. So perhaps I can understand women (feminist or not) taking exception to being told what to do as women by someone who was a man last week!

    That’s biological - but there is the socio/environmenta/psychological constructs also in play. A man may wish to live their life and consider themselves female if they so wish but they are still biologically male. And vice versa of course. I have no problem with that at all.

    You're not doing yourself any favours in shaking off this potential stalker :wink:

    Your, sir, are also a TERF, according to Leuth.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Leuth said:

    Coming from the guy who's been trolling Charlton into letting him store his own antiques collection on the premises ;)

    This was - and I stress - a joke, btw
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842

    bobmunro said:

    Not a subject that I’ve given much thought to if I’m honest. But that won’t stop me commenting of course.

    Generally, with the exception of intersex conditions, there are two genders that most people can agree on - male and female. A man wearing a dress doesn’t make them a woman in the biological sense - even with surgery. Not aware that uterus and ovarian transplants accompany surgical realignment. So perhaps I can understand women (feminist or not) taking exception to being told what to do as women by someone who was a man last week!

    That’s biological - but there is the socio/environmenta/psychological constructs also in play. A man may wish to live their life and consider themselves female if they so wish but they are still biologically male. And vice versa of course. I have no problem with that at all.

    You're not doing yourself any favours in shaking off this potential stalker :wink:

    Your, sir, are also a TERF, according to Leuth.
    Is a TERF a good or bad thing to be called?

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    bobmunro said:

    bobmunro said:

    Not a subject that I’ve given much thought to if I’m honest. But that won’t stop me commenting of course.

    Generally, with the exception of intersex conditions, there are two genders that most people can agree on - male and female. A man wearing a dress doesn’t make them a woman in the biological sense - even with surgery. Not aware that uterus and ovarian transplants accompany surgical realignment. So perhaps I can understand women (feminist or not) taking exception to being told what to do as women by someone who was a man last week!

    That’s biological - but there is the socio/environmenta/psychological constructs also in play. A man may wish to live their life and consider themselves female if they so wish but they are still biologically male. And vice versa of course. I have no problem with that at all.

    You're not doing yourself any favours in shaking off this potential stalker :wink:

    Your, sir, are also a TERF, according to Leuth.
    Is a TERF a good or bad thing to be called?

    It has 'Radical Feminist' in it, so make your own mind up
  • limeygent
    limeygent Posts: 3,217
    Leuth said:

    Leuth said:

    Coming from the guy who's been trolling Charlton into letting him store his own antiques collection on the premises ;)

    This was - and I stress - a joke, btw
    Hilarious.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    edited March 2018
    Leuth said:

    bobmunro said:

    bobmunro said:

    Not a subject that I’ve given much thought to if I’m honest. But that won’t stop me commenting of course.

    Generally, with the exception of intersex conditions, there are two genders that most people can agree on - male and female. A man wearing a dress doesn’t make them a woman in the biological sense - even with surgery. Not aware that uterus and ovarian transplants accompany surgical realignment. So perhaps I can understand women (feminist or not) taking exception to being told what to do as women by someone who was a man last week!

    That’s biological - but there is the socio/environmenta/psychological constructs also in play. A man may wish to live their life and consider themselves female if they so wish but they are still biologically male. And vice versa of course. I have no problem with that at all.

    You're not doing yourself any favours in shaking off this potential stalker :wink:

    Your, sir, are also a TERF, according to Leuth.
    Is a TERF a good or bad thing to be called?

    It has 'Radical Feminist' in it, so make your own mind up
    I certainly don’t believe I self identify as one of them. Is it good or bad - if good I might reassess my position!

  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,737
    I just thought I’d add my tuppeny worth.

    I couldn’t give a flying fuck either way.
  • alan dugdale
    alan dugdale Posts: 3,076
    And I’ll chip in, if I may. Thank feck for the Match Threads and Takeover articles to cheer us all up.