Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Up the duff.

2»

Comments

  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    From her profile pic she looks like my arsehole after that dodgy curry I had saturday
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    edited September 2017
    Thought you'd be on this thread quicker sooner Chizz...
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Thought you'd be on this thread quicker Chizz...

    "Sooner"

  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    Chizz said:

    Thought you'd be on this thread quicker Chizz...

    "Sooner"

    Edited
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,345
    edited September 2017
    Chizz said:
    Why post inflammatory tweets here that'll just piss us off?

    If you choose to have a third child, you choose to support it under new laws. You know that as you take the seed...
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339
    edited September 2017

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts handouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    Was the Royals responsible for introducing this rule then?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    Was the Royals responsible for introducing this rule then?
    As you know, all Acts require Royal Assent. But that's not the point of the tweet. Obviously.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,601
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,983
    Dazzler21 said:

    Chizz said:
    Why post inflammatory tweets here that'll just piss us off?

    If you choose to have a third child, you choose to support it under new laws. You know that as you take the seed...
    Cos the mans an absolute bell
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
    So what are you saying now, that your predictive text confused 'hangouts' with 'benefits' and not 'handouts'?


  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339
    edited September 2017
    Dazzler21 said:

    Chizz said:
    Why post inflammatory tweets here that'll just piss us off?

    If you choose to have a third child, you choose to support it under new laws. You know that as you take the seed...
    You thought this one was inflammatory and likely to piss people off and the first one on the thread wasn't?

    I think the Rape Clause is an abhorrent and disgraceful piece of lawmaking. The fact that William and Kate are now having their third child would seem an appropriate time to air the subject. And obviously the person who posted that tweet thinks so too.

    I thought it was a funny, fairly clever, slightly shocking way to bring attention to a horrible, discriminatory and intrusive process. I'm sorry if it offended you.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
    So what are you saying now, that your predictive text confused 'hangouts' with 'benefits' and not 'handouts'?


    Oops! Yes, actually!
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
    So what are you saying now, that your predictive text confused 'hangouts' with 'benefits' and not 'handouts'?


    Oops! Yes, actually!
    It's very derogatory to use the term handouts when referencing people's much-needed tax credits and income support you know Chizz.

    Try and drag yourself out the dark ages eh
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,339

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
    So what are you saying now, that your predictive text confused 'hangouts' with 'benefits' and not 'handouts'?


    Oops! Yes, actually!
    It's very derogatory to use the term handouts when referencing people's much-needed tax credits and income support you know Chizz.

    Try and drag yourself out the dark ages eh
    What do *you* call the payments made to the royal family then?
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:

    Chizz said:
    Jeaus wept,

    That just aint classy at all.
    It's horrible that people are asked to do this though, isn't it?
    Yes, very hard hitting Chizz and it really made me think long and hard about government policy, but whats it got to do with the Royal Family?
    It's an interesting tweet, using satire to draw a parallel between women having to comply with provisions in the Rape Clause to continue receiving government hangouts and this particular woman who probably doesn't have to.
    "Handouts"
    "Benefits"
    So what are you saying now, that your predictive text confused 'hangouts' with 'benefits' and not 'handouts'?


    Oops! Yes, actually!
    It's very derogatory to use the term handouts when referencing people's much-needed tax credits and income support you know Chizz.

    Try and drag yourself out the dark ages eh
    What do *you* call the payments made to the royal family then?
    Wages - and very well earned an all
  • Sponsored links:



  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    Cheers for the little stars round *you*
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,826
    what an all round awful thread. embarrassed by it.

    Congratulations to the expectant couple.
This discussion has been closed.