Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New Penalty Shoot-Out System

Comments

  • happyvalley
    happyvalley Posts: 8,996
    The winner takes it all.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,998
    The loser has to fall.
  • Covered_End_Lad
    Covered_End_Lad Posts: 5,725
    A few keepers might feel it slipping through their fingers
  • superclive
    superclive Posts: 1,809
    There was something in their that night
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,764
    Good news. Makes a lot more sense than the current system.
  • cafcforever
    cafcforever Posts: 215
    Which super trooper will face their Waterloo by taking the deciding penalty?
  • creepyaddick
    creepyaddick Posts: 6,152
    It's all about the money, money, money.....
  • Halix
    Halix Posts: 2,237
    Well thats the name of the game.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,854
    garbage (that's a band from the 90's)
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    I guess it's slightly fairer but not a big deal IMO. A penalty shoot out brings pressure whatever, England will be no better if/when this in introduced
  • Sponsored links:



  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,348
    seems reasonable .. the winning/losing of the toss of a coin can be too crucial in too many sporting events
  • happyvalley
    happyvalley Posts: 8,996

    I guess it's slightly fairer but not a big deal IMO. A penalty shoot out brings pressure whatever, England will be no better if/when this in introduced

    When did ABBA sing that one?
  • 3blokes
    3blokes Posts: 4,610
    I was going to try to do something hilarious with the song SOS and 5-0-5 but tbh it wasn't really working, and sometimes life is too short eh. Best left. :+1:
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    What's the name of the game?
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,485
    edited August 2017
    Prefer the suggestion someone else made on here (sorry can't remember who it was) of penalties before a match. If the match is drawn then it goes to the winner of that. Less pressure and fans always get to see a shootout.
    Oh and more importantly stops teams playing for pens, so should make extra time more exciting.
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,198
    edited August 2017
    Okay. Fairness. It might help. But most grounds have the away support at one end. Presumably there will still be a toss to decide which end the penalties will be taken or will they do that tennis tie break thing and change ends? As football supporters don't do that nice polite silence thing that tennis fans do.

    So, there's a spare referee (the fourth official) and two assistants. So how about taking two penalties at once in front of your own supporters? One at each end, simultaneously. Quicker. No toss needed. More chance of catching your trains or whatever. No whinging about what's fair. Split screen coverage on Sky. And if a goalkeeper wants to take a penalty a random outfield player has to take his place at the other end.

    Edited to add: no retakes either. For example, if an official deems the keeper has moved before the ball is kicked or is off his line, the penalty is automatically awarded.
  • The_Organiser
    The_Organiser Posts: 3,999
    Talal said:

    Prefer the suggestion someone else made on here (sorry can't remember who it was) of penalties before a match. If the match is drawn then it goes to the winner of that. Less pressure and fans always get to see a shootout.
    Oh and more importantly stops teams playing for pens, so should make extra time more exciting.


    Will it? I'd have thought if you won the pens pre-game, you'd be more than content with playing for pens in extra time?!
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,285
    What the actual statistics of the team going first wins?