Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England v Sri Lanka & Pakistan

1404143454652

Comments

  • Haha. Chicken pork ham hock and mustard. F**king Lush.

    Is that a sausage roll?!
  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,502
    edited August 2016
    Yep! In pasty with crackling on top.
  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,502
    They were M&S sausage rolls.
  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,652

    dickplumb said:

    England have a big problem in deciding what to do with Hales, Ballance and Vince. Do they persevere or drop one or two? or all three.

    Would expect , with the emergence of Woakes, that they will likely persevere with Hales, but give Ballance and Vince a break, and then promote Bairstow to 4, bring back Buttler to keep and bat 6 and Stokes will bat at 5, so, a first choice team of...

    Cook
    Hales
    Root
    Bairstow
    Stokes
    Buttler
    Ali
    Woakes
    Broad
    Wood/Finn
    Jimmy.

    Might also start to see the emergence of Sam Curran next year too, though maybe they might leave him til after an Ashes series.
    I suppose Ballance might be given a second third chance as his record against the Indians is very good. Hales will keep his place until someone with a better technique/temperament comes along. Vince won't tour and will need to score big in the county championship to be considered again.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,334
    Heard an interesting story about Vince while I was still the Oval on Friday. I won't go into any detail, but it's clear that he's a very, very talented cricketer, but he has one, major technical issue he needs to overcome before he'll make the leap from county batsman to Test-class cricketer: his asronishing lack of self-belief.

    For his sake, I wouldn't take him on tour yet; let him spend a year or two making millions of runs at first class level; and bring him back when he's ready and when he knows he's ready.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    He's certainly got 'it' when you look at his technique. Lets hope he comes back (having got rid of *that* shot that keeps getting him out. Don't think he needs the likes of stupid Boycott saying publicly that he shouldn't ever play tests again.

    Also getting a bit bored with Warne , has probably the best insight into the game, but getting a bit fed-up with his stupid sayings, 'salmon trout', talking about hair gel, 'getting a few on-board', - Arlott he is not. Just stick to talking about cricket.
  • Ben18
    Ben18 Posts: 1,638
    Unless something major happens, I imagine our first choice test side for the winter will be:

    Cook *
    Hales
    Root
    Ballance
    Ali
    Stokes
    Bairstow +
    Woakes
    Rashid
    Broad
    Anderson
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    I think the selectors have been too loyal to Hales, Vince and Ballance this series. It's the classic situation where a winning team masks the failures of certain players, whereas if we had lost at Edgbaston changes would probably have been made.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    I think that they will keep Ballance but drop Hales and Vince. I also believe that Bell will be recalled and that they will add two young up and coming batsmen to the squad - one of which maybe Duckett and the othe will be Ansari who could double up as the third spinner to Ali and Rashid.

    Something like this:

    Cook
    Duckett
    Root
    Bell
    Ballance
    Ansari
    Ali
    Rashid
    Bairstow
    Buttler
    Stokes
    Woakes
    Broad
    Anderson
    Wood
    Finn
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Yeah, good call re Duckett, but believe he will be given his chance in limited-overs first.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Bell-drummond perhaps? Or borthwick?
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    One of the things that this series shows is how Englnad struggle when there is little lateral movement - shows that both this years (SL aside) and last seasons touring both won both games in London, where we probably have the flattest wickets going.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846

    One of the things that this series shows is how Englnad struggle when there is little lateral movement - shows that both this years (SL aside) and last seasons touring both won both games in London, where we probably have the flattest wickets going.

    Scoreboard pressure does play a part though. If England had got 450-500 in the first innings, then Pakistan would have been under more pressure batting first time.

    As if happened, the pitch was very flat on days 2 and 3, so a perfect time for Pakistan to get a big score then whittle out a few knackered and frazzled England batsmen...

    2-2 is a fair reflection of the series. England lost to Pakistan in the UAE, so it was never going to be an easy series
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,915
    image

    I think that they will keep Ballance but drop Hales and Vince. I also believe that Bell will be recalled and that they will add two young up and coming batsmen to the squad - one of which maybe Duckett and the othe will be Ansari who could double up as the third spinner to Ali and Rashid.

    Something like this:

    Cook
    Duckett
    Root
    Bell
    Ballance
    Ansari
    Ali
    Rashid
    Bairstow
    Buttler
    Stokes
    Woakes
    Broad
    Anderson
    Wood
    Finn

    Not likely to be ansari. Suffering from various injuries this year. Just as he looks like he has regained form or confidence he gets struck by another one. Has underperformed with the bat too. Think that player will be Borthwick. Can bat in the top order and bowl.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
    Indicative of how hard it is now to win away from home - Sri Lanka get stuffed 3-0 by England but then beat Australia by the same score!

    Herath took 7 wickets against England but no less than 28 against the Aussies.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    looking at the Oz innings, they seem to have bigger problems than us in middle order, with Voges,Henriques,Marsh and Nevill batting at 4,5,6,7 respectively, that's not a middle order to give bowling attacks nightmares.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    edited August 2016
    Day/nighter at Aegeas Bowl about to start.

    Pakistan won the toss & bat first.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846
    England: Alex Hales, Jason Roy, Joe Root, Eoin Morgan (capt), Ben Stokes, Jos Buttler, Moeen Ali, Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid, Liam Plunkett, Mark Wood

    Pakistan: Azhar Ali (capt), Sharjeel Khan, Mohammad Hafeez, Babar Azam, Shoaib Malik, Sarfraz Ahmed, Mohammad Nawaz, Imad Wasim, Wahab Riaz, Mohammad Amir, Umar Gul

    Stokes plays as a batsman, though to me that leave's the bowling slightly short. Presumably Root will be the 6th bowler, if required
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    edited August 2016
    25-1

    Sharjeel c Buttler b Wood 16
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    Azhar dropped by Hales off Woakes in the gully.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    Azhar dropped by Buttler off Plunkett (a difficult one).
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    Hafeez got away with one there. Plunkett appealed for an lbw, turned down on review, as umpires call, but clearly hitting leg stump.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    52-2

    Hafeez c Hales b Root 11
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,846

    England: Alex Hales, Jason Roy, Joe Root, Eoin Morgan (capt), Ben Stokes, Jos Buttler, Moeen Ali, Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid, Liam Plunkett, Mark Wood

    Pakistan: Azhar Ali (capt), Sharjeel Khan, Mohammad Hafeez, Babar Azam, Shoaib Malik, Sarfraz Ahmed, Mohammad Nawaz, Imad Wasim, Wahab Riaz, Mohammad Amir, Umar Gul

    Stokes plays as a batsman, though to me that leave's the bowling slightly short. Presumably Root will be the 6th bowler, if required

    Ignore the first half of this line!
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    84-2 off 18
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001
    Azam lbw Rashid 40

    113-3

    Definite lbw apart from the inside edge and possibly hitting him outside the line.
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    124-3 off 26
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    124-3 off 26

    Azam lbw Rashid 40

    113-3

    Definite lbw apart from the inside edge and possibly hitting him outside the line.

    No reviews ?
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    They wasted their only review on the first wicket, apparently the clearest edge you'll ever see and hear, yet the batsman reviewed it
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,001

    124-3 off 26

    Azam lbw Rashid 40

    113-3

    Definite lbw apart from the inside edge and possibly hitting him outside the line.

    No reviews ?
    As above, only 1 review permitted & Sharjeel used it up appealing his wicket. Holding said he'd drop him for that selfish action. (He may have said he'd never play him again, but in this heat I'm not certain).