Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New European Super League

«134

Comments

  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Good. Let them do it. Their fans will love the away days.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,442
    Surely Leicester deserve to be in it more than Liverpool at the moment?
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    I stopped reading the URL when I saw it was from The Sun.

    Given how much money is to be made in the Premier League, why on earth would you want to break away? Even if (and it's a big if) there is as much/more to be made in the new super league, you wouldn't be eligible for the champions league and thus would have one league as an income source. Not to mention you'd be strengthening your rivals. Total nonsense. Slow news day.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,030
    I think there are talks with UEFA due soon over the financial split of the new Champions League TV package for the 2018/19 season onwards - every time that happens the big clubs start the nonsense about a European super league.
  • Simonsen
    Simonsen Posts: 5,497

    Who cares anymore. Let them do it. Football is irretrievably dead and will never be the same enjoyable sport it was in the past.
    Money has completely destroyed football.

    Agree. Let them do it. With Liverpool out of the picture, we might get terracing back.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    What I like is all the sources they've used for that article.
  • EastTerrace
    EastTerrace Posts: 3,961
    seth plum said:

    Good. Let them do it. Their fans will love the away days.

    most of the fans don't even go to the home games so no worries there!

  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,559
    Can eventually see it happening as a midweek league taking over from the Champions League, adjacent to domestic competition, league cup only for non participating clubs and the F A Cup down to no replays. The clubs that choose to participate with their 70 players squads complaining about fixture congestion and pushing through a reduced Premier League to 18 clubs and only two relegation places. Winter break introduced to allow top clubs to rest their players in friendly tournaments in the Far East and Dubai
  • Jints
    Jints Posts: 3,487
    SDAddick said:

    I stopped reading the URL when I saw it was from The Sun.

    Given how much money is to be made in the Premier League, why on earth would you want to break away? Even if (and it's a big if) there is as much/more to be made in the new super league, you wouldn't be eligible for the champions league and thus would have one league as an income source. Not to mention you'd be strengthening your rivals. Total nonsense. Slow news day.

    You should have carried on reading. It's not about ditching the Premier League but the Champions League.
  • Sponsored links:



  • "Man U, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City chiefs in talks to LEAVE Champions League"


    That's nice. Seeing as one of that lot has hardly been it recently anyway and 3 of them likely won't be in it next year.
  • "Man U, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City chiefs in talks to LEAVE Champions League"

    LOL! I'm sure the fact that Moan Utd, for the second time in 3 years, and Chelsea face not qualifying for the Champions League next year has nothing at all to do with this decision!

    Quite obviously, these 5 clubs don't fancy being frozen out of their money-grabbing League by upstarts like Leicester and Tottenham. How much better to have a competition where they automatically qualify and one that doesn't admit upstarts.

    Let them get on with it for all I care.
  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,140
    Best thing that could happen. Then a new TV deal for everyone else split equally between all 92 clubs.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    This has been inevitable ever since the introduction of the Champions League. In a cup half full kind of way, this could benefit English football, with more teams having a chance of winning something.
    Depending on which outfits make the final 'Euro Cut', we could have Leicester, Spurs, West Ham, Everton, Charlton, Accrington Stanley and Uncle Tom 'n all vying for honours, and more and more British players being given a chance as the 'cream' of the world's 'stars' will be even more evenly spread across Europe.
    In a glass half empty way though, many 'glamour' fixtures would be lost.
    Personally I think that the sooner the Euro bubble bursts the better. When it happens, then professional football at the higher level will retract from the Hollywood style lalaland it has inhabited for the past few years
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,408
    All of the English 5 have come out this morning and said they did not attend such a meeting and they do not want to leave the Champions League.
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486

    This has been inevitable ever since the introduction of the Champions League.

    Inevitable for 24 years? I think if teams had wanted it by now it would have been done already.

  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,345
    Ross said:

    All of the English 5 have come out this morning and said they did not attend such a meeting and they do not want to leave the Champions League.

    to semi-quote Randy Mice-Davies .. they would say that wouldn't they ((:>)
  • Assuming plans did go ahead for this and there was a european super league set up with say 16/18/20 teams, how exactly is it decided who gets to go in?

    Is it decided on current income? Fan base? Past history?

    Too many factors that are questionable for this to go ahead any time soon. For example if they're going off past history and including Liverpool then they'd probably have to invite the likes of AC and Inter. But then the likes of Spurs, Napoli, Roma etc could all argue they're currently better sides and it will all kick off.
  • Let them go on the proviso that they can never come back...
  • colthe3rd
    colthe3rd Posts: 8,486
    A lot of people assuming that this is true. Do this many people believe what the sun publishes?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Assuming plans did go ahead for this and there was a european super league set up with say 16/18/20 teams, how exactly is it decided who gets to go in?

    Is it decided on current income? Fan base? Past history?

    Too many factors that are questionable for this to go ahead any time soon. For example if they're going off past history and including Liverpool then they'd probably have to invite the likes of AC and Inter. But then the likes of Spurs, Napoli, Roma etc could all argue they're currently better sides and it will all kick off.

    It will be decided on purely who brings most money to the project in terms of potential revenue for everyone.

    Manchester City will be involved despite being relatively new to the trough. Why ? Because they have fat wads of cash. History, Fan base etc will mean zip compared to the bank statement.

    Let em go and good riddance.



  • palarsehater
    palarsehater Posts: 12,296
    Slowly but surely football is dying, completely against modern football it's a fucking joke, far too much money involved these business people can do what they want with clubs as long as there making money, look at what wankchops has done to us.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    KM is in trouble if Rolo finds out she wasn't there!

  • Simonsen
    Simonsen Posts: 5,497

    Slowly but surely football is dying, completely against modern football it's a fucking joke, far too much money involved these business people can do what they want with clubs as long as there making money, look at what wankchops has done to us.

    Us fans have eaten ourselves because we couldn't help but subscribe to SKY.

    Plus Bosman fucked it up too.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    Simonsen said:

    Slowly but surely football is dying, completely against modern football it's a fucking joke, far too much money involved these business people can do what they want with clubs as long as there making money, look at what wankchops has done to us.

    Us fans have eaten ourselves because we couldn't help but subscribe to SKY.

    Plus Bosman fucked it up too.
    You sucked yourself off when you got sky?
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,991

    Who cares anymore. Let them do it. Football is irretrievably dead and will never be the same enjoyable sport it was in the past.
    Money has completely destroyed football.

    Exactly this
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,194

    Simonsen said:

    Slowly but surely football is dying, completely against modern football it's a fucking joke, far too much money involved these business people can do what they want with clubs as long as there making money, look at what wankchops has done to us.

    Us fans have eaten ourselves because we couldn't help but subscribe to SKY.

    Plus Bosman fucked it up too.
    You sucked yourself off when you got sky?
    Everyone has their own little celebration rituals. Don't judge.

  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    Haha, genuinely spat beer out my nose at that!

    Brilliant
  • MountsfieldPark
    MountsfieldPark Posts: 2,074
    edited March 2016
    Could be a tactical ploy by the big clubs to pressure UEFA for guaranteed wild cards into the CL and/or a change to qualifying rules to exclude smaller countries and give more places to the big countries.

    (England is at serious risk of losing one of its CL places.)
  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    This is only an issue in England because of the potential volatility at the top. In all the other top European leagues (bar Italy possibly) you know who will qualify every year. Barca, Real, PSG, Bayern it's not really an issue to have guaranteed places as they wil always qualify.