Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK: Charlton 0-1 Bristol City
lancashire lad
Posts: 15,692
many thanks to the 65 Lifers who gave marks, here are the stats:
















2
Comments
-
Well done LL but that is depressing reading1
-
-
thanks Ross, it was depressing watching it and even worse inputting it, that's me done watching them until Preston.ross1 said:Well done LL but that is depressing reading
0 -
We rarely win when we have more possession.0
-
They clearly saw our biggest problems being in midfield rather than defence! Fox being better than Cousins is certainly surprising though.madadd said:how the football league professional pundits saw it

Also interesting that they gave Reza a 6, i.e. joint best with Solly. I certainly don't think he was anywhere near the second worst player in the team on Saturday4 -
LL I know the ave mark is based on fans opinions therefore purely subjective
and you have indicated before performance score is gleaned from Whoscored.com am I correct ?
Out of interest where do the pass accuracy and defence actions figures come from?0 -
They are published on a web site called squawka.com who get them from an organisation called OPTA. Personally I don't like the Squawka site as they do not include Lookman when he plays and I have emailed them but to no avail, trouble is I can't find the same stats anywhere else as OPTA charge for them.madadd said:LL I know the ave mark is based on fans opinions therefore purely subjective
and you have indicated before performance score is gleaned from Whoscored.com am I correct ?
Out of interest where do the pass accuracy and defence actions figures come from?0



