Players Marks: Watford v Charlton
Comments
- 
            Etheridge-5 thought he kept the score down, the defence in front of him was shocking.
 Solly-5 put in a shift but hard going.
 Wiggins-4.5 done for pace 1st half, better 2nd.
 Bikey-4 looking slower every game.
 Ben Haim-4.5 over run.
 Wilson-2.5 made one tackle. what happened to the steady eddie of last season ?
 Buyens-3 his worse game in a cafc shirt
 Cousins-3 maybe his worse game for us.
 Gudmundsson-3 nothing came off for him today
 Harriott-3 struggled most of game.
 Vetokele-4 started off lively then fell away.
 Watt-5 game was all ready lost when he came on. tried hard.
 0
- 
            Etheridge-4
 Solly-5
 Wiggins-4
 Bikey-3.5
 Ben Haim-4
 Wilson-1has hit rock bottom. Now he's started digging.
 Buyens-3 I am not a fan
 Cousins-2
 Gudmundsson-3
 Harriott-.0.5
 Vetokele-4.5
 Watt-4 had no chance. Must be glad to be here.
 0
- 
            Etheridge - 4. Saved some certain goals, but also conceded some preventable ones.
 Solly - 5.
 Wiggins - 5
 Bikey - 3. Deeney had him in his back pocket all day.
 Ben Haim - 4. See above, though quicker and better.
 Wilson - 4. meh
 Buyens - 3. meh
 Cousins - 3. Like him as a player, but not on form today (not alone there).
 Gudmundsson - 5. Had certain moments but many simple mistakes.
 Harriott - 2. Very selfish at times, and offered very little
 Vetokele - 5. Tried hard (again).
 Watt - 5. Looked lively.
 Team effort/performance - 1. Looked like a group of individuals today. No communication or team effort.0
- 
            lancashire lad said:For those of you who watched the match, your marks please: 
 Etheridge 6.5
 Solly 6
 Wiggins 5.5
 Bikey 4.5
 Ben Haim 4.5
 Wilson 5
 Buyens4.5
 Cousins 5
 Gudmundsson 4.5
 Harriott 4.5
 Vetokele 5
 Watt 5.5
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a0
- 
            
 Etheridge 4
 Solly 4
 Wiggins 5
 Bikey 3
 Ben Haim 4
 Wilson 2
 Buyens 3
 Cousins 2
 Gudmundsson 3
 Harriott 2
 Vetokele 4
 Watt 5
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a
 0
- 
            Etheridge - 8 Some great saves in the early bombardment.
 Solly - 5 Not his fault he was given the captaincy but not a captain in a million years. Looked ordinary.
 Wiggins - 5 Coming back from injury and it showed.
 Bikey - 3 Refuses to get up for headers. That sets the tone. Drop him.
 Ben Haim - 5 Crap but has had to play with a non-partner in the last few games. That's taken it's toll.
 Wilson - 3 Couldn't be bothered. One on one with their full-back...so played it back. Liked his effort last season but last three games has been a disgrace. Transfer him.
 Buyens - 4 Odd good pass but not a tackle in sight. Not up for the battle. Drop him.
 Cousins - 4 Tried but dropped us in it with his terrible passing. Centre midfielder? Not on this showing.
 Gudmundsson - 4 Weak. Has talent but where's the guts that allows the talent to shine?
 Harriott - 5.5 Ok with the ball. Almost useless without it. Tried to make things happen second half.
 Vetokele - 4 A victim of the 4-5-1 system but still a non event. Totally dominated by. Watford centre halves.
 Watt - 6 For effort alone.
 Church -6 For effort alone.
 Gomez n/a
 Management; thrust into the job but made a Mons of it by picking Wilson and not firing the team up for a pressing game against a team we'll known for hating a pressing opposition. Why wait until half time to make the sub?0
- 
            
 Not blaming him (the others were poor)....but he hasn't tried an ounce in the last three games. I've seen some wasters in my time (David Campbell...) and Wilson's last few showings are elevating him into that category. Shame, because I've liked his efforts up until recently. Lawrie...are you trying to play your way to the sack?floydroadfaithfull said:Lets all blame Wilson again 0
- 
            
 We played 5 in midfield and that's meant to help cover the full-backs. Their midfield won the ball and got it out wide or played into Deeney. Cousins and Buyens didn't win a tackle or second ball and Bikey/Ben Haim didn't get in first on their centre-forwards. Basically we sat back and allowed them to pass around or through us.Pedro45 said:Etheridge 6.5 (MoM) - Made three or four good saves, and waas without much protection all afternoon. Kicking is a massive problem as he always wants two touches... 
 Solly 6 - Early booking and chasing shadows most of game, but never gave up
 Wiggins 5.5 - No protection but did OK, though was done for their third goal
 Bikey 5.5 - Slow, tired, and second best most afternoon
 Ben Haim 6 - Tried hard but little protection or help from anyone else
 Wilson 2 - No skill, no movement, no craft - contribution was zero so 2 is for turning up!
 Buyens 5 - Went through motions
 Cousins 4 - Poor game in middle; no time equals no passing for Jordan
 Gudmundsson 5 - Had a couple of chances but wasted them
 Harriott 4.5 - An enigma waiting to happen (but don;t hold your breath!)
 Vetokele 6 - Some good hold up play and turns but no support
 Watt 4 - Flattered to deceive after coming on; wandered aimlessly after Church replaced Igor
 I actually thought Watford played pretty well, with some lovely passing and skills once the game was won (25 mins!). Our 4-2-3-1 set up afforded the full backs no protection, and Buyens and Cousins were over-ran, exposing Bikey and Ben Haim. Watford also exploited the height of our full backs and tried regularly to get balls to the back post. Set piece defending is still abhorrent!0
- 
            lancashire lad said:For those of you who watched the match, your marks please: 
 Etheridge. 2. His 'good' saves were generally for the cameras. Poor keeper, instills no confidence, we need Hendo back and quick.
 Solly. 5. Got done a number of times, not one of his better games but still one of the best.
 Wiggins. 4. Poor today but give him credit for keeping going.
 Bikey. 2 shambles
 Ben Haim. 1. Massive shambles and completely uninterested.
 Wilson. 3 Oh dear.
 Buyens. 1. A poor excuse of a man. Grow a pair of balls, you are pathetic.
 Cousins. 4. Kept going
 Gudmundsson. 4. Occasional good thing
 Harriott. 3. Three crosses, two of them were across our own box! I have never seen anything like it
 Vetokele. 4. Good start, we went 2 down and he lost all interest.
 Watt. 5. At least he tried. Must wonder what he has come to.
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a1
- 
            Etheridge 5
 Solly 5
 Wiggins 5
 Bikey 4
 Ben Haim 5
 Wilson 3
 Buyens 5
 Cousins 4
 Gudmundsson 4
 Harriott 2
 Vetokele 5
 Watt 5
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a0
- 
Sponsored links:
- 
            Etheridge 5 MOM - it could have been 6 or 7
 Solly 4.5 - up against it all afternoon. Gets an extra 0.5 for coming over to the fans at full time not dissapearing down the tunnell like others
 Wiggins - up against it all afternoon
 Bikey 4 - didn't look interested
 Ben Haim 4 - think he made an early goaline clearance at 0-0
 Wilson 2 - don't honestly remember him doing anything positive of note
 Buyens 3 - had no control of the game and no interest
 Cousins 3 - worst game i've seen him play
 Gudmundsson 4 - still managed to get a shot at goal at 0-0 and pinged a couple of decent balls, little else
 Harriott 2 - completely anonymous
 Vetokele 4 - decent start but once again no service and lost interest
 Watt 5 - looked our best outfield player in the 2nd half but the match was already lost when he came on
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a
 Jackson 7 - even though he was injured, still took it upon himself to order the players to us at full time. Wouldn't be a bad shout to make him player / manager for the rest of the season and drop Luzon with the 'no visa' excuse.0
- 
            Surprised Etheridge is getting such good marks. Yes he made some decent saves but wtf was he doing for the second goal? I'll have to see it again but I'm sure his failure to come out was what made it so easy for their scorer.1
- 
            Etheridge 4 couple of decent saves but positioning and kicking poor
 Solly 4 sorry but not a captain doesn't have enough presence on pitch
 Wiggins 3 takes too long to recover from injury
 Bikey 2 has had a shocking 3/4 games
 Ben Haim 3 losing initial enthusiasm, quality and drive rapidly
 Wilson 2 always been shite
 Buyens 3 same as THB but less grity
 Cousins 4 not the problem but not the solution either
 Gudmundsson 3 undoubted quality but a luxuary the team could not carry yesterday
 Harriott 2 criminal he got back into team after suspension. Jumped over the ball at the end to avoid a shot! Crap and no confidence-the worst combination
 Vetokele 3 extremely poor today. Hardly recognisable from september/october
 Watt 5 respected fans for our effort but marked highest because he gets the ball and runs towards the goal!0
- 
            Etheridge 4
 Solly 5
 Wiggins 5
 Bikey 3
 Ben Haim 5
 Wilson 3
 Buyens 3
 Cousins 4
 Gudmundsson 5
 Harriott 2.5
 Vetokele 5
 Watt 6 - just because he ran back to help Rhoys; won the ball then cleared it up the line - NOT into his own 6-yard box (are you listening Callum?)
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a
 1
- 
            How do you pick a man if the match out of that???0
- 
            
 In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is King.cantersaddick said:How do you pick a man if the match out of that??? 1
- 
            Etheridge 5.5
 Solly 5.5
 Wiggins 5.5
 Bikey 3.5
 Ben Haim 5
 Wilson 3.5
 Buyens 3.5
 Cousins 4.5
 Gudmundsson 6
 Harriott 3.5
 Vetokele 5
 Watt 6
 Church 4.5
 Gomez 5.50
- 
            Etheridge 5
 Solly 4
 Wiggins 3.5
 Bikey 3
 Ben Haim 3.5
 Wilson 2.5
 Buyens 2
 Cousins 2
 Gudmundsson 3
 Harriott 2
 Vetokele 5
 Watt 40
- 
            Etheridge - 5
 Solly - 3
 Wiggins - 2
 Bikey - 3
 Ben Haim - 2
 Wilson - 2
 Buyens - 2
 Cousins - 3
 Gudmundsson - 2
 Harriott-2
 Vetokele- 2
 Watt - 4
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a0
- 
            I gave it a day to do this, but can't give more than these
 Etheridge-5.5
 Solly-4
 Wiggins-3.5
 Bikey-1.5 Clown. People still yell 'Beeaaast' - makes my skin crawl.
 Ben Haim-1 Truly dreadful
 Wilson-1.5
 Buyens-1 Never want to see him in a CAFC shirt again
 Cousins-3.5
 Gudmundsson-1.5 Lazy and abject
 Harriott-4 Purely cos no matter how bad the things he tried were, he never hid
 Vetokele-1.5
 Watt-6 Only player that looked up for it. No service of course.0
- 
Sponsored links:
- 
            Etheridge - 6.5 At least three fantastic saves but shouldn't be beaten at that post from a free-kick. Was academic anyway.
 Solly - 4 Tried but a rare off day.
 Wiggins - 3.5 Was given a torrid time but with little cover.
 Bikey - 2.5 He's not better than Morrison; end of story.
 Ben Haim - 4 Worst he's played all season
 Wilson -1.5 He used to be shite, but now he's... shite again.
 Buyens -1.5 Dreadful. His decline is effectively a microcosm of how our season's gone. Started well....
 Cousins - 4 At least jumped for headers and tried to cover some ground.
 Gudmundsson - 2 Piss-poor free-kicks and deliveries again. Nowhere near as good as some make out.
 Harriott - 1 Pure shite (again). Should be in League Two.
 Vetokele -4 Didn't do much but dreadful service. Can't really be blamed.
 Watt-6 Almost feel bad for the guy. What has he walked into here?0
- 
            Etheridge 5
 Solly 4
 Wiggins 3
 Bikey 3.5
 Ben Haim 4
 Wilson 3
 Buyens 3
 Cousins 3
 Gudmundsson 4
 Harriott 2
 Vetokele 3
 Watt 5.5
 0
- 
            Etheridge 6 for some of the saves he made were very good
 Solly 5
 Wiggins5
 Bikey5
 Ben Haim5
 Wilson2
 Buyens3
 Cousins4
 Gudmundsson4
 Harriott3 jumped when he should have fought
 Vetokele4 absent
 Watt5
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a0
- 
            Etheridge - 3 couple of flashy saves for the cameras but the worst performance I've seen by a Charlton keeper for many a year. Is he really better than Pope?
 Solly - 4 very poor by his standards. Think the early booking didn't help
 Wiggins - 5 at fault for the third goal but not our worst by a long way
 Bikey - 4 off the pace
 Ben Haim - 5 some nice touches but at the heart of a defence which conceded five
 Wilson - 2 embarrassing
 Buyens 2 invisible
 Cousins - 4 very disappointing playing in his preferred position. Must do much better
 Harriott - 5 better than most
 Gudmundsson - 5 some decent thrusts but poor first touch on more than one occasion when played into a decent position
 Vetokele - 6 our best player. Tried hard and looked sharp on his own against three big centre backs0
- 
            Etheridge 5 Made 4 excellent saves but in my view was at fault for 2 goals . Like Pope he needs a loan in the lower Division to get games. Keeping him in our first team is going to cost us further.
 Solly 5 Never really got going
 Wiggins 6 An extra mark for his early goal line clearances
 Bikey 5 Beginning to show the negative side of his game
 Ben Haim 6 Would benefit from Gomez partnering him.
 Wilson 5 Disappointing . I had heard Peeters didn't rate him . I hoped he might have seen this as an opportunity.
 Buyens 5 Not the presence he was earlier in the season .
 Cousins 5 He played in his natural position today . No spark.
 Gudmundsson 5 Was our only creative outlet recently . Disappointing.
 Harriott 5 Had high hopes for him after the way he played under Riga . Another one I had hoped that would see the change in manager as an opportunity.
 Vetokele 5 is he carrying an injury ?
 Watt 5 At least he looked interested0
- 
            
 Yet he scored a brace against this opposition last season, to keep us up, and has a Championship hat-trick. Definitely League Two. Plus the lads only 20I_Saw_Semedo_Score said:
 Harriott - 1 Pure shite (again). Should be in League Two.1
- 
            
 he who hath the highest average will be deemed the most sacred MoM, even the lowest may be the highest in the land of Duchâteletcantersaddick said:How do you pick a man if the match out of that??? 0
- 
            Etheridge 4
 Solly 4
 Wiggins 3
 Bikey 2
 Ben Haim 3
 Wilson 1
 Buyens 3
 Cousins 3
 Gudmundsson 4
 Harriott 1
 Vetokele 3
 Watt 4
 Man that started the chlamydia chant 10 (MOM)0
- 
            Etheridge 5
 Solly 4
 Wiggins 3
 Bikey 2
 Ben Haim 5
 Wilson 1
 Buyens 2
 Cousins 3
 Gudmundsson 5
 Harriott 1 always been shit, complete waste of space, absolute clown
 Vetokele 4
 0
- 
            Etheridge - 5
 Solly - 4
 Wiggins - 4
 Bikey - 3
 Ben Haim - 4
 Wilson - 3
 Buyens - 4
 Cousins - 4
 Gudmundsson - 3
 Harriott - 2
 Vetokele - 4
 Watt - 4
 Church n/a
 Gomez n/a
 0













