Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Marks: Watford v Charlton

lancashire lad
Posts: 15,633
For those of you who watched the match, your marks please:
Etheridge
Solly
Wiggins
Bikey
Ben Haim
Wilson
Buyens
Cousins
Gudmundsson
Harriott
Vetokele
Watt
Church n/a
Gomez n/a
Etheridge
Solly
Wiggins
Bikey
Ben Haim
Wilson
Buyens
Cousins
Gudmundsson
Harriott
Vetokele
Watt
Church n/a
Gomez n/a
0
Comments
-
I dread to think what will be posted here1
-
Should be interesting .0
-
Fucking dreadful.
0 -
Would be interesting if everyone refused to mark.0
-
4
-
Etheridge should get 8 he kept us from having double figures past us Tony watt 10 for being only the brave charlton player to come over at the end . All the rest won't even get a game in the conference.1
-
MARKS PLEASE, save your comments for the post match thread
Thank you2 -
2 for everybody and that's generous.0
-
I think that noone should give any marks for this. Would highlight what the fans think.
alanscoachdriver - please erase your comment.0 -
Etheridge 4 couple of great saves but at fault for at least 2 goals
Solly 5 not himself but one-off the better players
Wiggins 4 badly at fault for the 4th. Generally below what is expected
Bikey 3 slow and ponderous. Stop believing you are some kind of beast and start playing like earlier in the season
Ben Haim 4 worst I've seen him play for us
Wilson 2 lucky to get that. Worse than last week and that was inexcusable
Buyens 3 not involved and far too slow.
Cousins 4 lost his way this season.
Gudmundsson 4.5 worst game ice seen him have but better than most
Harriott 1 how he walked back into the team after a ban is beyond me. Awful decision making.
Vetokele 3 isolated and disinterested
Watt 4.5 ran a bit but zero service
Church n/a achieved the chief sum of fuck all apart from raising my blood pressure. I never want to see him in a red shirt again
Gomez n/a
2 -
Sponsored links:
-
Was at the ground.... P'ah!!! First time ever that I can't be arsed to mark us0
-
Etheridge 5
Solly 4
Wiggins 4
Bikey 3
Ben Haim 3
Wilson 3
Buyens 3
Cousins 4
Gudmundsson 4
Harriott 3
Vetokele 5
Watt 4
Church n/a
Gomez n/a
0 -
Etheridge 3 let in 5. One world class save but indecisive, reactive and slow. Poor
Solly 4 limited as he picked up a booking early on. One of our better players.
Wiggins 4 made a few good blocks but too easily beaten by their winger.
Bikey 2 Deeney ripped him to shreds. Diabolical. At fault for a couple. Very poor
Ben Haim 3 beaten too often. Very slow and by his standards was shit.
Wilson 2 decision making was awful. Why doesn't he use his pace more? He's got it.
Buyens 4 good passer but rarely got on the ball.
Cousins 3.5 passed to a yellow shirt too often. Probably showed the most desire but what can you do when everyone is poor?
Gudmundsson 3 had two perfect chances to score in the first half. Fluffed his lines
Harriott 3 first half he was non existent but second half he improved slightly. Needs to take his man on more often.
Vetokele 3.5 got through the injured CB a couple of times in the first 15 minutes but after their first goal everything fell apart. No service whatsoever.
Watt 4 a bit like Igor and the rest of our strikers, there's no service into them whatsoever.
Church n/a done nothing wrong
Gomez n/a strong
Might seem like a knee jerk reaction but there was no desire. No passion and no effort. All we ask for is the players to give 100%. They didn't give 100% today. That's what's most disappointing.1 -
Etheridge 4
Solly 4
Wiggins 4
Bikey 4
Ben Haim 5
Wilson 3
Buyens 4
Cousins 4
Gudmundsson 5
Harriott 3
Vetokele 5
Watt 5
Church n/a
Gomez n/a0 -
Etheridge 4
Solly 4
Wiggins 5
Bikey 3.5
Ben Haim 5
Wilson 4
Buyens 4
Cousins 4.5
Gudmundsson 4.5
Harriott 4
Vetokele 5
Watt 5
Edit; just seen the goals on SSN and didn't realise from the other end of the pitch Bikey was at fault for at least 2 in the first half so relegated to worst defender.0 -
Etheridge 4 - Couple of good saves but at fault for goals too.
Solly 5 - Captain didn't exactly lead by example. Tough winger to play against though.
Wiggins 5 - One off the line, but skinned way too often.
Bikey 3 - Dire
Ben Haim 5 - Few decent challenges but beat far too often
Wilson 2 - No effort
Buyens 2 - No effort
Cousins 4 - Headless chicken and always 2 yards behind the play
Gudmundsson 5 - Awful first 30 but then improved
Harriott 3 - Effort, but was dire
Vetokele 3 - No effort
Watt 5 - No service but looked like he wanted the ball.
Church n/a
Gomez n/a0 -
Etheridge 6.5 (MoM) - Made three or four good saves, and waas without much protection all afternoon. Kicking is a massive problem as he always wants two touches...
Solly 6 - Early booking and chasing shadows most of game, but never gave up
Wiggins 5.5 - No protection but did OK, though was done for their third goal
Bikey 5.5 - Slow, tired, and second best most afternoon
Ben Haim 6 - Tried hard but little protection or help from anyone else
Wilson 2 - No skill, no movement, no craft - contribution was zero so 2 is for turning up!
Buyens 5 - Went through motions
Cousins 4 - Poor game in middle; no time equals no passing for Jordan
Gudmundsson 5 - Had a couple of chances but wasted them
Harriott 4.5 - An enigma waiting to happen (but don;t hold your breath!)
Vetokele 6 - Some good hold up play and turns but no support
Watt 4 - Flattered to deceive after coming on; wandered aimlessly after Church replaced Igor
I actually thought Watford played pretty well, with some lovely passing and skills once the game was won (25 mins!). Our 4-2-3-1 set up afforded the full backs no protection, and Buyens and Cousins were over-ran, exposing Bikey and Ben Haim. Watford also exploited the height of our full backs and tried regularly to get balls to the back post. Set piece defending is still abhorrent!0 -
Lets all blame Wilson again0
-
I thought Harriott was worse in the first half, surprised he stayed on. lazy and stupid today.floydroadfaithfull said:Lets all blame Wilson again
2 -
Etheridge 5
Solly 6
Wiggins 5
Bikey 5
Ben Haim 5
Wilson 4
Buyens 5
Cousins 4
Gudmundsson 4
Harriott 4
Vetokele 5
Watt 5
Church n/a
Gomez n/a
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Etheridge 5
Solly 4
Wiggins 4
Bikey 3
Ben Haim 3
Wilson 2
Buyens 3
Cousins 3
Gudmundsson 4
Harriott 2
Vetokele 3
Watt 40 -
Etheridge 5
Solly 4
Wiggins 3
Bikey 2 Morrison should be in this team now not him useless
Ben Haim 4
Wilson 1 dog shit of a player get rid.
Buyens 3
Cousins 3
Gudmundsson 3
Harriott 3
Vetokele 4
Watt 40 -
Etheridge 3
Solly 4
Wiggins 4
Bikey 4
Ben Haim 4
Wilson 2
Buyens
Cousins 3
Gudmundsson 3
Harriott 2
Vetokele 4
Watt 5
Church n/a
Gomez n/a0 -
0 to the lot of em. No fight no spirit. Disgrace1
-
Etheridge 4
Solly 4
Wiggins 4
Bikey 4
Ben Haim 4
Wilson 3
Buyens 3
Cousins 4
Gudmundsson 3
Harriott 3
Vetokele 5
Watt 50 -
idlehans said lets blame wilson again thats because he two bob0
-
Etheridge 2
Solly 2
Wiggins 1
Bikey 1
Ben Haim 1
Wilson 1
Buyens 1
Cousins 1
Gudmundsson 1
Harriott 1
Vetokele 1
Watt 2
Church 1
Gomez n/a kid looks class.
Support 9
Watford Town centre 8 - good pubs.
Cheers0 -
Etheridge was by far our best player.
can't be bothered to rate the rest of the shower of shite.1 -
lancashire lad said:
For those of you who watched the match, your marks please:
Etheridge - 5.5; Looked dodgy at times it's true, but a couple of very good saves and probably shell-shocked from the rubbish in front of him
Solly - 3
Wiggins - 3
Bikey - 3
Ben Haim - 3
Wilson - 2
Buyens - 2
Cousins - 3
Gudmundsson - 3
Harriott - 3
Vetokele - 4
Watt - 5; Tried hard to make a good impression with the fans in all he did today.
Church n/a
Gomez n/a0