Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

chelsea penalty

gotta feel for steve clarke and west brom.we had one shit ref yesterday but the penalty awarded to chelsea yesterday was bollox.ramerez one the deck without even looking to get to the ball.another ref conned ,last minute of stoppage time footballs becoming a joke.
«1

Comments

  • boggzy
    boggzy Posts: 3,627
    Got to wonder if these kind of refs are bent. Being at The Valley yesterday it was so ridiculous, it really seemed like it
  • 1StevieG
    1StevieG Posts: 10,972
    Typical comments from Mourinho saying it was a pen. Well we know it was a Penalty because the ref gave it. Defender stands his ground and Ramires barges into him and then chucks himself on the floor. Some of the simulation seen these days is a joke and we should be seeing a lot more penalties going on that swandive.
  • Never a penalty, ref was swayed by the cult of Mourinho.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,108
    Language!
  • smiffyboy
    smiffyboy Posts: 4,314
    If you watch it again ramires feet are off the floor as he hits the defender, so he was clearly jumping into him to try and con the ref which he succeeded in.
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    As if life isn't easy enough for the big teams, they get refs who give them soft pens when they're at home.
  • Mundell Fleming
    Mundell Fleming Posts: 854
    edited November 2013
    Ramires is a terrific player, but he's a cheat unfortunately. In one game last season (I can't remember which match) his simulation for a penalty was the most sophisticated I've ever seen. Mourinho is no better of course. He knows Ramires dived.

    Its great that both Alex Ferguson and David Moyes have publically stated that Ashley Young cheats. More of that kind of integrity from Managers would help, but the real answer is to review incidents like this and to suspend the guilty players for, say, 3-5 matches. Mind you, that's been obvious for years and there's still no sign of it happening.

    FIFA still don't seem to understand that retrospective punishments based on video evidence (or even the use of video evidence during matches) would help referees not undermine them.

    Steve Clarke is wrong to blame Andre Marriner. The job of referees is hard enough as it is without having to worry about whether somebody has simulated. Every time the referee is blamed in a situation like this it absolves the cheats of responsibility.

  • Disgusting. Typically classless behaviour from mourinho. He's getting found out now.
  • Maintained his record of never being beaten at home didn't it?
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,965



    The job of referees is hard enough as it is without having to worry about whether somebody has simulated. Every time the referee is blamed in a situation like this it absolves the cheats of responsibility.

    Absolutely. 100% correct.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Huskaris
    Huskaris Posts: 9,896
    Can't remember who it was think it was Holloway who said this, but anyone who brings a player down in a goalscoring position gets red carded, so anyone who simulates to create a goalscoring opportunity (penalty) should themselves be sent off, something that could maybe be imposed after the game too.

    It should not be a part of the game. I come to watch football, not acting.
  • Saga Lout said:

    As if life isn't easy enough for the big teams, they get refs who give them soft pens when they're at home.

    Lampard's little tumble outside the area in the last game of 2005 springs to mind...

  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,999

    Saga Lout said:

    As if life isn't easy enough for the big teams, they get refs who give them soft pens when they're at home.

    Lampard's little tumble outside the area in the last game of 2005 springs to mind...

    Or Gordon Durie going down yards outside the box and rolling in at the Battle of the Bridge.

    Mind you, Humphrey would've been off for doing that now.
  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,326
    edited November 2013
    And two of my mates on facebook are bemoaning the decisions that go for Chelsea. One is Liverpool the other Manchester Utd... needless to say I could not refrain from commenting.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,475
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^nothing new .. Liverpool and Manchester United in days gone by never conceded and were always seemingly granted dubious looking penalties .. referees DEFINITELY are swayed by a) home crowds b) vociferous players c) clubs 'at the top'
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456

    Maintained his record of never being beaten at home didn't it?

    Apart from Barcelona, Basle and Charlton.

    A bit like Huddersfield unbeaten record (of course the play offs don't count)

  • Saga Lout said:

    As if life isn't easy enough for the big teams, they get refs who give them soft pens when they're at home.

    Lampard's little tumble outside the area in the last game of 2005 springs to mind...

    Yes I also remember that one! The game was live on TV and I was hoping for a top ten finish.Felt absolutely robbed in the end.

    I agree that referees have a tough job to do.But in a situation which is not black-and-white,decisions ALWAYS go against the smaller clubs.
    Remember this one as well cos I was fuming at the commentators who were ignoring the fact it was outside the box saying that "the day wasnt about Charlton" anyway and it felt like we were just there to make up the numbers...

    FFS we could have finished top half and got more prize money had we bloody drawn!!
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,178

    Disgusting. Typically classless behaviour from mourinho. He's getting found out now.

    Getting found out how exactly?

    Those Champions league and domestic league titles didnt win themselves.
  • Dave2l
    Dave2l Posts: 8,880
    Mourinho's home record is too good he won't be able to accept any kind of what would be known as a cheap defeat to west brom. His pride and ego will tell him that Chelsea still deserved something out of the game and that it was a plausible penalty decision.

    That kind of behaviour is not a good sign for Chelsea fans. He is a character and does that a lot but obviously everything isn't all Rosey at Chelsea which might not even get sorted out properly. I have always disliked the club for many reasons. It's funny.
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,213
    It reminded me of JFH's tumble during the battle of the beach. The dive was bad enough, that he conned a 'foul' out of SCP was annoying, but the nod of approval as he lay on the floor really wound me up.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Super_horns
    Super_horns Posts: 1,299
    1StevieG said:

    Typical comments from Mourinho saying it was a pen. Well we know it was a Penalty because the ref gave it. .

    You can bet you bottom dollar he would have been raging like a bull if that "penalty" had been given against Chelsea.

    Its why I don't bother with manager interview post game as you know they are just going to be full of excuses and biased comments.

    Trouble is managers dare not suggest their own player dived for fear of getting a phone call from said players agent demanding a transfer...

  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Compared with the penalty Stoke got in the last minute of injury time today - then this one was a dead cert!
  • Super_horns
    Super_horns Posts: 1,299
    Addickted said:

    Compared with the penalty Stoke got in the last minute of injury time today - then this one was a dead cert!

    True - how could the ref be certain that was a handball!
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,462
    People are blaming the ref, but it is really the system.

    Referees are trained to act a certain way by the way the referee reviewing system works. It's a gross simplification, but referees are punished more severely for not awarding fouls or making bookings than they are for erroneously giving fouls and bookings, especially if there's any sort of tenuous argument in support
    of the foul or booking.

    A referee will always suffer being marked down far more for missing a potential foul than they ever will for giving a soft one.

    Therefore the referees at the top of the game are the ones who have progressed up the leagues by getting good reviews and that means not missing fouls/bookings.

    Hence you get referees trained by the FA to blow up if there's even the hint of a foul.

    Until the system is changed it won't matter if individual refs are demoted, suspended or even fired, their replacements come from the same flawed system and will continue to make the same poor decisions.

  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,965
    I'm bored of Mourinho.

    His record speaks for itself, but personally, I was never a fan of his media style. However, at least when he first arrived he was fresh and new and entertaining (if you like that sort of thing).

    Now he's back, he's no different and it's just got old. Same old bullshit excuses, pathetic posturing and pretentious soundbites. He's like a parody of himself and I just wish the press would wake up to it, stop laughing at his, ahem, "jokes" and, frankly, stop giving him a chewie every time he opens his mouth.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    today's sun pointed out that the referee is in fact an aston villa fan, i wonder if westbrom really pushed it if they could get it replayed?

    i'm not suggesting they would/should but the rules state that he should not be in charge of west brom games.
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,213

    People are blaming the ref, but it is really the system.

    Referees are trained to act a certain way by the way the referee reviewing system works. It's a gross simplification, but referees are punished more severely for not awarding fouls or making bookings than they are for erroneously giving fouls and bookings, especially if there's any sort of tenuous argument in support
    of the foul or booking.

    A referee will always suffer being marked down far more for missing a potential foul than they ever will for giving a soft one.

    Therefore the referees at the top of the game are the ones who have progressed up the leagues by getting good reviews and that means not missing fouls/bookings.

    Hence you get referees trained by the FA to blow up if there's even the hint of a foul.

    Until the system is changed it won't matter if individual refs are demoted, suspended or even fired, their replacements come from the same flawed system and will continue to make the same poor decisions.

    Is it really the system that's at fault? Or is it the 22 bare-faced liars doing all they can to fool the poor human being doing his best to help them get through a fair, 90-minute game?
  • People are blaming the ref, but it is really the system.

    Referees are trained to act a certain way by the way the referee reviewing system works. It's a gross simplification, but referees are punished more severely for not awarding fouls or making bookings than they are for erroneously giving fouls and bookings, especially if there's any sort of tenuous argument in support
    of the foul or booking.

    A referee will always suffer being marked down far more for missing a potential foul than they ever will for giving a soft one.

    Therefore the referees at the top of the game are the ones who have progressed up the leagues by getting good reviews and that means not missing fouls/bookings.

    Hence you get referees trained by the FA to blow up if there's even the hint of a foul.

    Until the system is changed it won't matter if individual refs are demoted, suspended or even fired, their replacements come from the same flawed system and will continue to make the same poor decisions.

    It's odd that this system doesn't seem to encourage them to award last minute ghost penalties to smaller teams.
  • I'm bored of Mourinho.

    His record speaks for itself, but personally, I was never a fan of his media style. However, at least when he first arrived he was fresh and new and entertaining (if you like that sort of thing).

    Now he's back, he's no different and it's just got old. Same old bullshit excuses, pathetic posturing and pretentious soundbites. He's like a parody of himself and I just wish the press would wake up to it, stop laughing at his, ahem, "jokes" and, frankly, stop giving him a chewie every time he opens his mouth.

    The article where Henry Winter was talking about taking him a present of custard creams or something when he was managing abroad was one of the most pathetic bits of sports journalism I've ever seen. Quite the achievement in such a sea of sludge.
  • Super_horns
    Super_horns Posts: 1,299
    West Brom asking for video replays over penalties - offsides and handballs next?

    [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24937668[/url]

    Game would never end!