Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton Away Kit 2013/14

123457

Comments

  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    They had rather smart looking white keepers tops in the club shot, as well as the green.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,348
    Heat for Hire ,,, what a great slogan
  • WSA
    WSA Posts: 1,913
    Yann does it for me - sorry Jacko.
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,348
    they really should tuck in their shirts
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    Bloody love that white shirt. . . . What's wrong with you people?! Cheer up and get a bit more positive. Jezebel!
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,560
    No moaning from me, like them both
  • falconwood_1
    falconwood_1 Posts: 7,368

    No moaning from me, like them both

    *collapses*

  • Nug
    Nug Posts: 4,623
    Less is more from Nike at the moment, look at their tennis clothing couldn't be more basic. Few years go their was some trim or stripes or something, now it's an orange tick. They've all gone down the minimalist apple route.

    In response to some on here I do get excited about kits, haven't bought one for myself since the age of about 12 but think it's an important part of any club.
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,978
    Looks like Ill be getting a TOFFS Charlton shirt this season then....
  • addickson
    addickson Posts: 891
  • Sponsored links:



  • Dave2l
    Dave2l Posts: 8,866
    We can call this kit- The Chef
  • I like them both.

    If it were not for the the sponsor (yes, I know it's unpopular to criticise a local business supporting the club) I would have bought them both.

    Great shirts, with an embarrassing company logo on the front.
  • BlackForestReds
    BlackForestReds Posts: 17,952

    I like them both.

    If it were not for the the sponsor (yes, I know it's unpopular to criticise a local business supporting the club) I would have bought them both.

    Great shirts, with an embarrassing company logo on the front.


    What is embarrassing about the sponsor?

  • If palace had that sponsor people would be taking the piss out of it. FACT.
  • BlackForestReds
    BlackForestReds Posts: 17,952

    If palace had that sponsor people would be taking the piss out of it. FACT.

    Whatever.

  • There would probably be a thread on it.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,221
    That "embarrasing" sponsor paid around 70% more than Palace's shirt sponsor did last season and over three times what Millwall's did.

    What I find strange KHA is you said that you don't care if the clothes you wear are made by child labour or if football club owners are crooks but a logo, that embarrasses you.





  • chazza
    chazza Posts: 243
    edited July 2013

    That "embarrasing" sponsor paid around 70% more than Palace's shirt sponsor did last season and over three times what Millwall's did.

    What I find strange KHA is you said that you don't care if the clothes you wear are made by child labour or if football club owners are crooks but a logo, that embarrasses you.







    100% this.
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,051
    chazza said:

    That "embarrasing" sponsor paid around 70% more than Palace's shirt sponsor did last season and over three times what Millwall's did.

    What I find strange KHA is you said that you don't care if the clothes you wear are made by child labour or if football club owners are crooks but a logo, that embarrasses you.







    100% this.
    And again! Like both shirts, by the way, as well.
  • EpsomAddick
    EpsomAddick Posts: 2,557
    To a small extent I understand KHA's point - from a style point of view, Andrews Sykes Group would look a bit better than Andrews Air Conditioning or Andrews Heat for Hire

    However, what's more important is that we have a sponsor who has put a lot of their money into the club. They need to advertise what their company does, as many people will not know what Andrews Sykes group does.

    And I know I'd rather have this on the shirts than wonga.com, for example.
  • Sponsored links:



  • BlackForestReds
    BlackForestReds Posts: 17,952

    To a small extent I understand KHA's point - from a style point of view, Andrews Sykes Group would look a bit better than Andrews Air Conditioning or Andrews Heat for Hire

    However, what's more important is that we have a sponsor who has put a lot of their money into the club. They need to advertise what their company does, as many people will not know what Andrews Sykes group does.

    And I know I'd rather have this on the shirts than wonga.com, for example.

    One of the golden rules of marketing is that if people don't know your company or brand you need to tell people what you do - this is no time to be subtle.

    This must be a first though - now some of our fans are Charltonising the sponsors.
  • That "embarrasing" sponsor paid around 70% more than Palace's shirt sponsor did last season and over three times what Millwall's did.

    What I find strange KHA is you said that you don't care if the clothes you wear are made by child labour or if football club owners are crooks but a logo, that embarrasses you.

    I think I said cheap labour not child labour.

    I think I said I would have been happy with Chelsea's successes. I'm not sure I said Abramovich was a crook. Dubious practices are not always the same as breaking the law.

    I said that the logo was embarrassing, not the company, and I do think it is not very stylish. I'm more than happy that the club is associated with Andrews, a local business, I just think the logo makes the shirts something I would choose not to wear.

    However, I don't, personally, see why there should be a link between my ethical beliefs and my choice of leisure wear so I'm not sure why you find it strange, to be honest.
  • Splodge
    Splodge Posts: 514
    Andrews Air Conditioning on both shirts would have been nice. Heat for Hire sounds a bit ridiculous to wear on a garment. AAC does what it says on the tin.
  • Absurdistan
    Absurdistan Posts: 8,024

    I like them both.

    If it were not for the the sponsor (yes, I know it's unpopular to criticise a local business supporting the club) I would have bought them both.

    Great shirts, with an embarrassing company logo on the front.

    Too working class for you KHA?
  • I like them both.

    If it were not for the the sponsor (yes, I know it's unpopular to criticise a local business supporting the club) I would have bought them both.

    Great shirts, with an embarrassing company logo on the front.

    Too working class for you KHA?
    Nope!
  • cafc4life
    cafc4life Posts: 4,632
    edited July 2013
    i was right with my preciction of whom would be unveiling the shirt on friday.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    edited July 2013
    I'm glad we have a sponsor who isn't a an internet betting or payday loan company. If people want to take the 'P' out of that, is says more about them than anything else. If I was in the market for air conditioning, I know where I would go for it!
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,811
    think the away kit looks superb, best set of kits we've had for years.
  • Don't think i've actually had a Charlton shirt since i was about 13, but i think the 2 new kits are miles better than anything we've had for a long time
  • Jarman
    Jarman Posts: 1,851
    These kit's are so good that even our team couldn't get a set of them for the game at welling last sat!