Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Albert Einstein

lordromfordlordromford
in Fun, Jokes & Captions
Ok, he may have hit upon e=mc^2

I only have one problem...

He wasn't really that good at maths and didn't really dominate the public image of modern science.

Can anyone say that they are really happy with Einstein's contribution?

Dara O'Briain's quite good at maths and it will be interesting to see which other lifers would agree that he would be a good choice to come up with the next major advance in modern science?

Love from dippee
«1

Comments

  • Options
    McBobbinMcBobbin
    Rachel from countdown has been responsible for many major advancements...
  • Options
    TelMc32TelMc32
    And his hair...what was all that about?? Dara doesn't have that problem for starters and Rachel certainly has a number of outstanding points already to her credit!
  • Options
    Folev the redFolev the red
    Dara also isn't German.

    But problem is he's Irish...
  • Options
    StigStig
    You are absolutely correct Dippee. I think that Einstein is a bit like Leaburn; full of promise as a youngster, but thrown in deep too soon and couldn't handle it. He's done nothing for the past 60 years. There's no plan B, I don't think he could put out a new theory if he tried.

    He's not the only one though. Take Newton, he might have invented gravity, but he didn't have a clue about quantum mechanics. I mean, what's the point of coming up with something as usful a gravity if you don't understand the mysterious shimerings of sub-atomic particles - they're gonna get you every time. Embarrassing.

    The there's DaVinci. Calls himself a great artist and inventor. Have you seen his notebooks? My kids can produce neater looking reports.

    And that Hawking's useless. I bet he's not been near the training pitch in years. You can't build that reputation just on being a great dribbler and having nothing else to your game. And as for Archimedes, what a waste of space; I've never know a scientist screw up so much.

  • Options
    Henry IrvingHenry Irving
    Stig said:


    The there's DaVinci. Calls himself a great artist and inventor. Have you seen his notebooks? My kids can produce neater looking reports.

    I went to see his cartoons at the National Gallery.

    Didn't laugh once
  • Options
    DaveMehmetDaveMehmet
    Stig said:



    He's not the only one though. Take Newton, he might have invented gravity, but he didn't have a clue about quantum mechanics. I mean, what's the point of coming up with something as usful a gravity if you don't understand the mysterious shimerings of sub-atomic particles - they're gonna get you every time. Embarrassing.


    Scored a good goal against Ipswich in the play off semi though.
  • Options
    LocoLoco
    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.
  • Options
    JayajoshJayajosh
    Watched a progamme the other date about Issac Newton...now he was a real maths genius for his day which was well before Einstein.
  • Options
    Big WilliamBig William
    Ian Dury told you all

    Einstein can't be classed as witless
    He claimed atoms were the littlest
    When you do a little Splitterness
    Frighten everybody shitless



  • Options
    StigStig
    There ain't half some clever b'stards.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    legaladdicklegaladdick
    OK. Albert Einstein may have been clever but only half as clever as Albert Zweistein
  • Options
    maybe_babymaybe_baby
    I'm not even happy with my own contribution.
  • Options
    LoOkOuTLoOkOuT
    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Now if he'd been English, he'd have known that!
  • Options
    AddicktedAddickted
    Einstein was not a handsome fellow
    Nobody ever called him Al
    He had a long moustache to pull on, it was yellow
    I don't believe he ever had a girl
    One thing he missed out in his theory
    Of time and space and relativity
    Is something that makes it very clear
    He was never gonna score like you and me
  • Options
    Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

  • Options
    Charlton and onCharlton and on
    When did Charlton life turn into a Millwall forum?
  • Options
    soapy_jonessoapy_jones
    Just thinking that feesh. Discussions on Einstein, poetic tribute...

    Melts
  • Options
    cafcpolocafcpolo
    Friend Or Defoe said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
  • Options
    Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    cafcpolo said:

    Friend Or Defoe said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    Correct. All electromagnetic radiation travels at C in a vacuum.
  • Options
    DaveMehmetDaveMehmet
    cafcpolo said:

    Friend Or Defoe said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    Not when the bag's full.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    LocoLoco
    smudge7946 said:

    Has e+mc2 got any practical uses in day to day life?

    Atomic energy!
  • Options
    LocoLoco
    cafcpolo said:

    Friend Or Defoe said:

    Loco said:

    The problem I have with that equation is that he uses light as a constant and it isn't.

    Why do you think that?

    And what is the original question? I think it's a great equation and Dara won't be making any breakthroughs.

    Isn't it light in a vacuum though which is constant?
    No light get slowed down accelerated and bent by gravity and magnetism, the point of the equation works because it produces an unquantifiable number but in reality it's wrong.
  • Options
    fattmattfattmatt
    Does the equation mean that a small amount of mass has a shit load of energy??
  • Options
    guinnessaddickguinnessaddick
    fattmatt said:

    Does the equation mean that a small amount of mass has a shit load of energy??

    Solly
  • Options
    maybe_babymaybe_baby
    1.5 million HP can be produced with a baked bean can full of plutonium...the calculation to know this is like the hardest sums I've ever had to do.

  • Options
    SenseiSensei
    maybe_baby said:

    1.5 million HP can be produced with a baked bean can full of plutonium...the calculation to know this is like the hardest sums I've ever had to do.

    Horse Power!!! That unit has seldom been used for energy since the 1960's apart from motive energy. You're either a Yank, very old or your're getting confused with HP Baked Beans ;-)

  • Options
    creepyaddickcreepyaddick
    Yes I bought this!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZqUNEHYZgQ
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!