Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

MATCH THREAD : Stoke City V Charlton Athletic : Tuesday 25th November 2025 : KO 19:45

eastterrace6168
eastterrace6168 Posts: 23,230
edited November 25 in General Charlton

Hi everyone, here we go with another Match Thread…

The team and travelling Addicks have a long trip on the road tonight and a visit to The Potteries and a match at The Bet 365 Stadium with Stoke City, not a great trip on a cold November evening after the debacle from Saturday, but we needed to get back on the pitch asap.

So, Stoke City sit in 3rd spot, four points above us, and in a comfortable position but suffered a weekend loss at The King Power Stadium when Leicester City were 2-1 winners, so they are on a losing streak…😉

HEAD-TO-HEAD…The two teams have locked horns on 64 previous occasions, with us winning 25, the Potters winning 27 and the remaining 12 encounters resulting in draws, so on paper at least, pretty evenly matched, the last meeting came at the bet365 Stadium in February 2020, when the hosts ran out 3-1 victors.

Team selection will be crucial, but probably enforced again due to the ongoing injury list, one person we missed Saturday, Bree is now available for selection after missing out against his parent club Saturday, and along with Bell and Edwards part of our depleted defence options.

The hosts will be without Lewis Baker (ankle) and Sam Gallagher (calf).

We'll be sporting our popular Reebok third kit tonight, now come on lads let's just put Saturday behind us, and get back to the Charlton we all know so well...🙌

Team news…

Luke Berry will make his first start of the season…

James Bree, who wasn’t eligible for Saturday’s game against his parent club Southampton, also returns to the starting XI as Nathan Jones makes two changes. 

There is also a place on the substitutes bench for Amari’i Bell, who is in the squad for the first time since limping off against Swansea City at The Valley earlier this month 

Kayne Ramsay, Lloyd Jones, Macaulay Gillesphey start in a back three in front of Thomas Kaminski.

Should the Addicks play in the five-box-one formation used against Wrexham then Bree and Tyreece Campbell would operate as wing-backs. Berry would likely join Conor Coventry, skipper Greg Docherty and Sonny Carey in a box midfield behind Miles Leaburn.

Bell is joined on the bench by Will Mannion, Keenan Gough, Karoy Anderson, Joe Rankin-Costello, Harvey Knibbs, Rob Apter, Ibrahim Fullah and Tanto Olaofe.

Charlton: Kaminski; Ramsay, Jones, Gillesphey; Bree, Coventry, Docherty (c), Campbell; Carey, Berry; Leaburn

Subs: Mannion, Gough, Bell, Anderson, Rankin-Costello, Knibbs, Apter, Fullah, Olaofe

«13456732

Comments

  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,022

    The very epitome of a cold Tuesday night away at Stoke. Especially after a 5-1 home humbling a few days earlier. Back to basics and a hard fought 0-0 would be the order of the day. COYRs

  • aso914
    aso914 Posts: 160
    Bell is back! 
  • 2121
    2121 Posts: 1,249
    0-3 cafc 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    image
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    image
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    Bell makes the bench. Lineup suggests box midfield with Campbell at LWB to me
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,097
    edited November 25
    4-4-2 diamond it is then

    Bell back on the bench is very good news
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    4-4-2 diamond it is then

    Bell back on the bench is very good news
    5-box-1 for me
  • Can’t tell if it’s a back four with Ramsay at LB and a diamond midfield or if Campbell is at LWB 
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,822
    Assuming that’s TC at LWB, Berry as a 10 behind Leaburn?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Docherty seriously and still no tanto 

    Another spanking incoming 
  • aso914
    aso914 Posts: 160
    Not sure how I feel about macca and jones as a cb pairing in a back four there’s a severe lack of pace but at least this proves NJ is willing to switch it up and I’m happy to see Berry starting. 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,097
    fenaddick said:
    4-4-2 diamond it is then

    Bell back on the bench is very good news
    5-box-1 for me
    I can see the box instead of diamond but 5 at the back plus two holding midfielders would be far too defensive IMO, we’d just get picked off.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    It's either

    TK
    Ramsay Jones Gillesphey
    Bree TC
    Cov Doc
    Berry Carey
    Leaburn

    Or 

    TK
    Bree Jones Gillesphey Ramsay
    Cov Doc
    Berry Carey
    Leaburn TC

  • Good to see Bree back, and Bell on the bench...
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,822
    aso914 said:
    Not sure how I feel about macca and jones as a cb pairing in a back four there’s a severe lack of pace but at least this proves NJ is willing to switch it up and I’m happy to see Berry starting. 
    Doubt it’s a back four. Bree and TC the wing backs I’d imagine.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,270
    fenaddick said:
    4-4-2 diamond it is then

    Bell back on the bench is very good news
    5-box-1 for me
    I can see the box instead of diamond but 5 at the back plus two holding midfielders would be far too defensive IMO, we’d just get picked off.
    Not when one of your 5 is TC and the other is Bree who has the ability to get forward (if fit)
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,023
    Has Nathan been on here & read my suggestion for a traditional 442 😀.




  • panther10 said:
    Docherty seriously and still no tanto 

    Another spanking incoming 
    Tanto is on the bench, and one of the gamechangers,,,don't give up hope just yet eh...
  • sammy391
    sammy391 Posts: 3,824
    Hernandez totally dropped, might that be the last we see of him!

    Great to have Bree back, and Bell on the bench- hopefully a positive result and we get through december with players coming back

    1-1 tonight please!

  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,822
    Has Nathan been on here & read my suggestion for a traditional 442 😀.




    No. It won’t be 4-4-2.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,023
    Hate that kit though. 
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 306
    Luke berry looked lively on Saturday when he came on, something I kept thinking to mention and didn’t.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,213
    sammy391 said:
    Hernandez totally dropped, might that be the last we see of him!

    Great to have Bree back, and Bell on the bench- hopefully a positive result and we get through december with players coming back

    1-1 tonight please!
    Yes, unless he has an injury, interesting that Apter makes the bench, but Hernandez doesn't.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,945
    2121 said:
    0-3 cafc 
    I will be more than happy with a point.
  • aso914
    aso914 Posts: 160
    edited November 25
    Sword65pf said:
    Luke berry looked lively on Saturday when he came on, something I kept thinking to mention and didn’t.
    He has great goalscoring instincts as well scored the late equaliser against hull, nearly scored a late equaliser against wrexham so I’m glad he’s getting a run out as a starter. 
  • MrBurns
    MrBurns Posts: 1,331
    Hopefully that's Hernandez gone. In Jones we trust!
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,339
    Berry played extremely high when he came on against Southampton. The team was a mess by the end but Tanto, Knibbs and Berry were basically a front three. I don't know if that informs what the shape is but I imagine Berry will be pressing beyond Leaburn and might play as a second striker. Good to see Bell on the bench
  • DDOUBLEE
    DDOUBLEE Posts: 1,579
    I really hope that Campbell and Leaburn can build on that colossal one League goal between them. Christ almighty.
  • swords_alive
    swords_alive Posts: 4,359
    edited November 25
    Stoke' s odds lengthening slightly with teams announced, moved out from 8/11 to 4/5 with William Hill (7% shift).

    On sky bet, Stoke out from 4/6 to 3/4 (8% move).

    Feeling 7.5% more confident of 0 here.
This discussion has been closed.