Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Luton Town v Charlton Athletic

At Kenilworth Road or on a stream your marks please:

Referee:

Steer:
Solly:
Pearce:
Sarr:
Page:
Reeves:
Cullen:
Aribo:
Fosu:
Taylor:
Vetokele:

Grant: n/a
Lapslie: n/a
Ajose: n/a
«1

Comments

  • Watched on ifollow

    Referee: 8

    Steer: 7.5
    Solly: 7.5
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 5.5
    Page: 7
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6.5
    Aribo: 8
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 6.5
    Vetokele: 6
  • edited September 29
    Steer 5.5 not sure what he was doing for that first goal
    Solly 8 didn't play brilliantly all things considered, but...yeah
    Pearce 6.5 beaten in the air for the first goal and a few slips, otherwise solid
    Sarr 7 thought he had a good game and denied them a few times, no blame for anything
    Page 6 an important outlet but wasn't quite at it
    Reeves 6 thought he looked lively and tigerish and very nearly scored a screamer that would have surely won it. but he also wasn't able to physically impose himself on a big luton side
    Cullen 6.5 thought he perhaps lacked presence today although his delivery from set-pieces was decent. a fine player regardless
    Aribo 6 one of the main reasons they got back in the game was because Aribo just isn't any good at defending or holding a shape. should be deployed further forward. won a penalty i guess
    Fosu 5 and that would be lower if he hadn't scored. an assortment of dives and blind alleys. can and should do far better
    Taylor 6 showed a poor touch and a wild shot. at least he ran all day
    Vetokele 5.5 again, very little from him aside from a couple of nice challenges to win it back
  • Steer: 6
    Solly: 7.5
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5
    Page: 5.5
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 5.5
    Aribo: 7
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 6.5
    Vetokele: 5.5
  • iFollow:

    Referee: 5

    Steer: 6.5
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5
    Page: 6.5
    Reeves: 5 (I've figured why he seems to be ubiquitous but without ever doing very much - it's his blonde hair and it makes him stand out! Ineffective and missed a great chance in the first half whilst taking 5 minutes to try and put it on his left foot!).
    Cullen: 5.5
    Aribo: 7
    Fosu: 7
    Taylor: 6.5
    Vetokele: 6

    Grant: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
    Ajose: n/a
  • Referee: 5.5

    Steer: 5
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 5.5
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 8 Mom
    Fosu: 6.5
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 5.5
  • iFollow

    Referee: 6

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 8
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Aribo: 8
    Fosu: 7
    Taylor: 6.5
    Vetokele: 6

  • Still on way back from game. Being an old got my IT skills don't let me copy and paste a whole team. However I can't believe some of the marks given so far. How anybody can give Sarr the same or anywhere near the same as Pearce baffles me. One is as good as anybody in this division whilst the other makes regular mistakes. His positional play is poor and marking variable!
  • iFollow

    Referee: 7

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 7.5
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 7
    Cullen: 6.5
    Aribo: 7.5
    Fosu: 8
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 7
  • Sponsored links:


  • Ifollow

    Referee: 6

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7,5
    Pearce: 6,5
    Sarr: 7
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6,5
    Aribo: 8
    Fosu: 7
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 6

    Grant: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
    Ajose: n/a
  • Referee: 7

    Steer: 7
    Solly: 7
    Pearce:6
    Sarr: 6
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 6
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 6
    Vetokele: 7
  • edited September 29
    Steer: 6.5
    Solly: 7.5 extra 0.5 for the goal
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5 0.5 off for fault at first goal
    Page: 7.5 thought he was excellent
    Reeves: 6.5
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 7.5 Mom
    Fosu: 7
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 6.5
  • edited September 29
    At match
    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 7
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 7.5
    Aribo: 6.5
    Fosu: 6.5
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 7
    Referee 4.5
  • Referee: 4

    Steer: 4 what possessed him to come out
    Solly: 5 (1) for the missed hit equaliser
    Pearce: 8
    Sarr: 7
    Page: 4 shocking
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Aribo: 6.5 wins the ball and then gives it back to them.
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 5

    Grant: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
    Ajose: n/a
  • Referee: 5 - missed a blatant pull back on Taylor

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6.5
    Cullen: 6.5
    Aribo: 6.5
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 7.5
    Vetokele: 6.5
  • edited September 29
    Leuth said:

    redman said:


    Still on way back from game. Being an old got my IT skills don't let me copy and paste a whole team. However I can't believe some of the marks given so far. How anybody can give Sarr the same or anywhere near the same as Pearce baffles me. One is as good as anybody in this division whilst the other makes regular mistakes. His positional play is poor and marking variable!

    Which one missed his header for their first goal?
    There was also a moment in the first half where Pearce completely misjudged the flight of the ball and allowed the striker to run clear through towards goal. Luckily the bloke wasn’t too pacy and was caught.

    Bottom line for me is that Pearce looked shaky on a couple of occasions today whereas I don’t remember Sarr putting a foot wrong.

    Sorry to do this on the player marks thread but wanted to justify my marks.
  • Referee: 6

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7 (+1 for the goal)
    Pearce: 6.5
    Sarr: 6
    Page: 5 had one of those days, his crossing was poor as well
    Reeves: 5.5
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 6.5
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 6.5
    Vetokele 5.5 worked hard, but no attacking threat.
  • edited September 29
    iFollow

    Steer: 6, blunder for the first, good passing
    Solly: 8, pretty solid, +1 for the goal
    Sarr: 5, bit clumsy, lacked confidence
    Pearce: 6, had a few clumsy moments too
    Page: 6.5, ok game, sent in some peaches
    Cullen: 6, didn't really notice him
    Aribo: 7.5, was winning the ball back
    Fosu: 8 (MotM) best dribbler in the league
    Reeves: 6, a lot of chasing, nothing too bad
    Taylor: 7.5, good hold up, very good in spells
    Igor: 6, weren't up to much first half, better 2nd


  • Sponsored links:



  • Referee: 6

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 6.5
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6.5
    Cullen: 7.5
    Aribo: 7
    Fosu: 7
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 6.5

    Grant: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
    Ajose: n/a
  • Watched on ifollow


    Referee: 5. Loves whistling

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 6.5
    Sarr: 7
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 7.5 MOM
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 7
    Vetokele: 6

    Grant: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
    Ajose: n/a
  • Referee: 5

    Steer: 6
    Solly: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Sarr: 7
    Page: 6
    Reeves: 6
    Cullen: 6
    Aribo: 6
    Fosu: 6
    Taylor: 7.5
    Vetokele: 6.5
  • I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.
  • clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
  • mendonca said:

    clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
    Usually you see more of the game on ifollow and aren't as swayed by the passion of the live crowd, so I'd argue the marks from ifollow will be more accurate on the overall performance of individuals
  • Steer 5.5 His fault for the first
    Solly 7 Good and bad but involved and got the goal
    Pearce 6 OK
    Sarr 7 A bit casual but was a positive influence on the game
    Page 6 Delivery wasn't his best
    Reeves 6.5 Busy
    Cullen 6 Was a bit quiet
    Aribo 7 Was very good with the ball. If he game improve his defensive game he will become one hell of a player
    Fosu 6.5 We have to remember it was his first start. Goes past opponents at will. We just have to find a way of maximising that.
    Taylor 6 Battled hard but too many poor touches and passes. Have sen him do much better
    Vetokele 6 Again battled, but not yet the Vetokele I remember. We missed Grant's forward runs today.

    Couldn't really pick a man of the match. A draw there is a decent result.
  • sam3110 said:

    mendonca said:

    clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
    Usually you see more of the game on ifollow and aren't as swayed by the passion of the live crowd, so I'd argue the marks from ifollow will be more accurate on the overall performance of individuals
    so you reckon that watching on a screen where what the eye can see is dictated by a cameraman/director usually following the ball, is better than being at a game where you can choose to watch any part of the stadium and/or game, or to watch (e.g.) how a particular player finds space or how quickly a defender can cover or recover to tackle an opponent ? .. well each to their own choice .. I love watching sport on the telly, BUT I'd far sooner be at the game choosing how and what I want to see
  • sam3110 said:

    mendonca said:

    clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
    Usually you see more of the game on ifollow and aren't as swayed by the passion of the live crowd, so I'd argue the marks from ifollow will be more accurate on the overall performance of individuals
    Watching a game on TV you see individual incidents better, but miss the off the ball movement etc It's swings and roundabouts
  • mendonca said:

    clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
    mendonca said:

    clb74 said:

    I'd like to object to people watching on I follow being able to mark on the game please.
    Of course if they are boycotting I will allow.

    It does strike me that there is quite a difference between watching the game on a phone screen and physically travelling to the away game.
    Watching a game on a phone screen? There's some people on CL who have 75 inch TV screens, you know.

    Anyway, people are sober watching on ifollow - and at an away game after a days hard drinking, some can have trouble remembering anything at all. :smile:

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out!