I cant wait for some bilge to come out of the club along the lines of "we only tried to renege on the fixture, because of the increased journey distance and the impact it would have on our carbon footprint" Charlton saving the planet.
Can perfectly understand the Dulwich take on this (mind you we’re only hearing one side of the story here), but I hope that they realise we are being run by a bunch of leaderless unprofessional twats, many of whom we are thoroughly ashamed of. That is not the club we know and love......hopefully some day soon we can begin to rebuild that respect.
Can perfectly understand the Dulwich take on this (mind you we’re only hearing one side of the story here), but I hope that they realise we are being run by a bunch of leaderless unprofessional twats, many of whom we are thoroughly ashamed of. That is not the club we know and love......hopefully some day soon we can begin to rebuild that respect.
Didn't someone say that Roland's been charging non-league clubs expenses for the friendlies because he knows they make money from them? Although I believe the Hamlet game was part of the Mascoll deal.
Apparently Dulwich responded that they would accept it being an U23s fixture, as long as Charlton paid the £30k they would have had to pay Dulwich for Mascoll had they not agreed to the first XI friendly. The 'unnamed official' said he was very disappointed with their attitude and would send the first XI.
I cant wait for some bilge to come out of the club along the lines of "we only tried to renege on the fixture, because of the increased journey distance and the impact it would have on our carbon footprint" Charlton saving the planet.
I cant wait for some bilge to come out of the club along the lines of "we only tried to renege on the fixture, because of the increased journey distance and the impact it would have on our carbon footprint" Charlton saving the planet.
I cant wait for some bilge to come out of the club along the lines of "we only tried to renege on the fixture, because of the increased journey distance and the impact it would have on our carbon footprint" Charlton saving the planet.
I think this needs to be a thing after today's spin.
I cant wait for some bilge to come out of the club along the lines of "we only tried to renege on the fixture, because of the increased journey distance and the impact it would have on our carbon footprint" Charlton saving the planet.
I think this needs to be a thing after today's spin.
That's why Lyle Taylor was on the train back from Sunderland... good work Charlton.
Perhaps if Dulwich Hamlet paid rent once in a while they could have had a friendly in there own ground.
What, you mean the outstanding rent charge that has now been withdrawn as it had no basis legally?
You need to do some research before making statements like that.
If there rent was paid in full and on time, they would still play at champions hill. Probably.
It's a great feeling to stick up for your own team. Some of you should give it a go sometime.
Meadow Residential were responsible for the club’s finances for the period that was allegedly unpaid. So they effectively hadn’t paid themselves supposedly and then when they handed over control to the football committee, used that as the excuse they were looking for to evict the club as a result of not getting their planning application approved by Southwark Council.
In reality, there was no debt and the fact that it has been challenged successfully and the “debt” withdrawn proves this.
There was no rent to pay, the whole thing was spurious and the fact that we’re not playing at Champion Hill is more to do with the machinations of Meadow Residential and their ambition to build on the land rather than any supposed debts of DHFC. That was just an excuse - they expected us to roll over and die but didn’t expect people to rally round the club as has happened.
Perhaps if Dulwich Hamlet paid rent once in a while they could have had a friendly in there own ground.
What, you mean the outstanding rent charge that has now been withdrawn as it had no basis legally?
You need to do some research before making statements like that.
If there rent was paid in full and on time, they would still play at champions hill. Probably.
It's a great feeling to stick up for your own team. Some of you should give it a go sometime.
What happened with Dulwich Hamlet is like Duchatelet evicting charlton from the valley because the club had “failed” to pay rent to staprix. Despite the fact both are owned by the same company and there would clearly be no rent to pay.
Meadow have thrown their toys out of the pram because they can’t get planning permission and are using the ground and the football club as a hostage to the local council. In fact Southwark council have threatened a compulsory purchase order on champion hill to get the club back there it’s so daft and clearly malicious.
As for “supporting your own team” I do support the manager and the players. Not some dickhead in a poorly fitted suit that decides to be a cunt to a local club that’s fallen on hard times through no fault of their own.
Dulwich Hamlet have a great system in place getting players through that go on to be pro footballers. You can garuntee they won’t be selling us the next oztumer or in this case mascoll that they discover now. Other non league clubs may well do the same.
Perhaps if Dulwich Hamlet paid rent once in a while they could have had a friendly in there own ground.
What, you mean the outstanding rent charge that has now been withdrawn as it had no basis legally?
You need to do some research before making statements like that.
If there rent was paid in full and on time, they would still play at champions hill. Probably.
It's a great feeling to stick up for your own team. Some of you should give it a go sometime.
Meadow Residential were responsible for the club’s finances for the period that was allegedly unpaid. So they effectively hadn’t paid themselves supposedly and then when they handed over control to the football committee, used that as the excuse they were looking for to evict the club as a result of not getting their planning application approved by Southwark Council.
In reality, there was no debt and the fact that it has been challenged successfully and the “debt” withdrawn proves this.
There was no rent to pay, the whole thing was spurious and the fact that we’re not playing at Champion Hill is more to do with the machinations of Meadow Residential and their ambition to build on the land rather than any supposed debts of DHFC. That was just an excuse - they expected us to roll over and die but didn’t expect people to rally round the club as has happened.
Comments
Charlton saving the planet.
That is not the club we know and love......hopefully some day soon we can begin to rebuild that respect.
You need to do some research before making statements like that.
We support a pack of *****.
If there is no Charlton we won’t need a planet!
Charlton is life
In reality, there was no debt and the fact that it has been challenged successfully and the “debt” withdrawn proves this.
There was no rent to pay, the whole thing was spurious and the fact that we’re not playing at Champion Hill is more to do with the machinations of Meadow Residential and their ambition to build on the land rather than any supposed debts of DHFC. That was just an excuse - they expected us to roll over and die but didn’t expect people to rally round the club as has happened.
Meadow have thrown their toys out of the pram because they can’t get planning permission and are using the ground and the football club as a hostage to the local council. In fact Southwark council have threatened a compulsory purchase order on champion hill to get the club back there it’s so daft and clearly malicious.
It’s not very difficult to look this stuff up.
Dulwich Hamlet have a great system in place getting players through that go on to be pro footballers. You can garuntee they won’t be selling us the next oztumer or in this case mascoll that they discover now. Other non league clubs may well do the same.
Indeed.
Us?